Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T07CM02857
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/19/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/19/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL AS REQUESTED ON TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS. 2. WHEEL STOPS ARE PARK OF A PARKING SPACE, NOT PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE. PROVIDE SEPARTION OF THE PEDESTRIAN WAY FROM THE PARKING AREAS AS PER DS 2-08.4.1. 3. PLAN DETAIL OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ACCESS TO TRAILER IS NOT CLEAR. REDRAW THIS AREA AT A LARGER SCALE AND SHOW ALL DETAILS OF THE RAMP ACCESS AS PER 2006 IBC/1CC 117.1, SECTION 405. SHAOW ALL DIMENSIONS REQUIRED FOR ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE. |
| 06/23/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Based on the label on the site plan which points to the street landscape border area, it appears that Board of Adjustment Variances are being sought for relief from landscaping, screening and other requirements. A landscape plan must be submitted as part of the submittal in order for variance comments to be provided. Submit a copy of the approved BOA Variance letter with the next submittal. Add the variance case number, date of approval, what variances were approved for and any conditions imposed to the site/landscape plan. 2. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4.A of the LUC, is required. Provide a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for point of ingress-egress. 3. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 4. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g 5. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 6. A 5-foot high continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 7. Show existing future sight visibility triangles on the plan per DS 2-02.2.2.1.A.10 8. The planting plan and layout calculations will include the following Information: Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material must be listed. Locations, size, and name of all existing vegetation to remain in place. Material and areas of inert ground cover. All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Indicate treatment for landscaped areas. 9. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a 10. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 11. Further comments may apply once a landscape and irrigation plan is submitted. |
| 06/23/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | From aerial photographs it is apparent that the site has been graded in recent years (sometime well after the Native Plant Preservation Ordinance effective date of July 1, 1997). This site is subject to NPPO requirements. Provide a copy of any documents or any approved grading plans for the site. LUC 3.8.3 |
| 06/25/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 25, 2008 SUBJECT: Site Plan TO: NJB Consulting (Norma) LOCATION: 5255 E Canada St, T15S, R14E, Section 2, Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T07CM02857 (Second Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan. Site Plan: 1. Show sight visibility triangles for the parking areas and for the main entry into the site. Since Canada Street is not paved, indicate the edge of the usual travel lane as the base of the SVT. If the parking arrangement that is shown on the plan is approved through the variance process, show how the customer service trailer will not block the vision of drivers backing into the street. 2. Explain by note or in a response letter how solid waste will be removed from the property. If roll cans are used, show their storage location on the plan. 3. Explain if additional paving is required or proposed for this site. Keep in mind if there is, then a revised drainage statement or drainage report will be required 4. None of the comments appears to have been addressed on site plan. Unable to determine any modifications. In addition, no comment letter was provided. Be sure to verify that response letter is submitted with next submittal. 5. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 06/30/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/18/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall. Senior Planner PROJECT: T07CM02857, 5255 E. Canada Street Tow in Yard, Commercial Storage A & B Towing Commercial Site Plan, 2nd Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: JULY 18, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. NOTE, A RESPONSE LETTER WAS NOT FOUND FOR THIS PACKAGE. 1. (last/current review) Per DS 2-02.2.1.2 provide the legal description for the property. 2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, with regards to parking: A) Per Zoning Administrator, provide a parking ratio of 1 parking space per 5000 gross floor area, and declare the GFA of the building. B) Per DS 3-05.2.1.b.3, provide a 10' wide parking space where abutting fences. C) Per DS 3-05.2.1.c.1, dimension PAAL behind parking spaces. D) I see general parking detail, thank you. Wheel stop allowed to be at 3' if the parking space is 20' long. Please correlate the detail to the drawing using a keynote. Note, if parking is only 18' long, wheel stop needs to be fully within 2.6" of top of parking space and detail would have to be revised. E) Sufficient room to back up out of parking space is needed, all maneuvering required on site. Setback gates accessing storage areas to allow for "back up spur" area dimensioned to DS 3-05.2.2.D 3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.9 and DS 2-09, with regards to bicycle parking: A) Note in the bicycle parking calculations for the required number of bike spaces is 8% of the total number of vehicle spaces provided, 90% class 1 10% class 2, note that under 50 vehicles spaces can allow for all bike parking to be class 2. B) Per LUC 3.3.3.5, provide a minimum of two class 2 bike racks. C) Provide detail of bike parking spaces. 4. (Per last/current review) Per DS 2-02.2.1.10, provide sight visibility triangles. 5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, with regards to PAALs: A) Please call out surfacing of all PAALs to be asphalt B) Please dimension PAAL width behind parking spaces C) Please declare the width of the entry PAAL to the site D) Declare surfacing of vehicle storage areas adjacent to PAALs 6. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12 with regards to pedestrian/disabled circulation - NOTE, SOME COMMENTS HAVE CHANGED TO REDESIGN OF SITE FROM LAST SUBMITTAL. A) Per DS 2-08.4.1.A, provide 4' wide sidewalk from street to building, note where along PAAL, provide physical separation per DS 2-08.4.1 between asphalt and pedestrian route. B) Provide a 4' wide concrete sidewalk between building and parking per DS 2-08.4.1.C C) physical separation required between a parking space and sidewalk (see side of pkg) D) Clarify if pedestrian area by parking is raised or in flush with the asphalt, per DS 2-08 E) Declare any pedestrian gates and provide a 4' wide opening for them per DS 2-08 F) Clarify pedestrian/disabled access to office (ramp?/stairs?) G) Per ANSI Ch. 4, At raised crossed markings, provide ramps with truncated domes where transitioning from vehicular use area to pedestrian refuge area. Provide dimensioned details of ramps with truncated domes. 7. (per last/current review) Per DS 2-02.1.20, please ensure any easements are shown graphically, with type and recordation information listed. Please provide a response letter advising if there are no easements. 8. Per DS 2-02.2.1.32, please see Engineering comments regarding the location and servicing of waste receptacles. 9. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.2, please provide the floor area ratio (FAR) calculation for the office building. Provide as a note, Per LUC 2.8.5.9.B, sound attenuation required for the structure, as it is within the NCD 70 of the Airport Environmental Zone near the Davis Monthan Base. 10. Please note, depending upon responses received in the resubmittal, further review comments may be forthcoming. Should there be any questions on this review, please contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T07CM02857 5255 e Canada 2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/25/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/25/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |