Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T07CM02835
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/2007 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 10/03/2007 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/18/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the water and waste piping sizes for the urinal, P-3. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 610.1, UPC 2006. 2. Confirm that the water cooler, P-6, complies with the requirements of Section 1109.5.1, IBC 2006. 3. Provide accessible water closets in the wheelchair-accessible restrooms. Reference Section 1109.2, IBC 2006. |
| 10/18/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Confirm the size of the existing water meter; Tucson Water claims not to be using ¾" meters. |
| 10/18/2007 | RBROOKS1 | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. AT RESTROOMS 111 AND 110 IT IS UNCLEAR IF THE DOORS TO THE WATERCLOSET ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN THE NEW OPENING OR IF THEY ARE TO BE DEMOLISHED. IF THE DOORS ARE TO BE INSTALLED THEY MUST SWING OUT. WITH THIS, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FRONT SIDE PULL SIDE CLEARANCE. REFERENCE ANSI A117.1 SECTION 404.2.3.1 2. PROVIDE A HIGH LOW ACCESSIBLE DRINKING FOUNTAIN. THE ILLUSTRATED FOUNTAIN DOES NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY. ADDITIONALLY PROVIDE A BARRIER AT THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ANSI A117.1 307.5. 3. AT DOOR 6, PROVIDE THE REQUIRE ACCESS FOR THE PULL SIDE LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR. 4. THE URINAL IS REQUIRD TO BE AN ACCESSIBLE ELONGATED UNIT INSTALLED PER ANSI 117.1 SECTION 605. 5. AT DOOT 7, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED CLEARANCES AS SPECIFIED IN ANSI A117.1 SECTION 404.2.3 FOR A LATCH APPROACH PULL SIDE OPERATION. 6. PROVIDE SIDE ELEVATIONS FOR THE ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS SHOWN ON SHEET A-4. THIS IS NECESSARY TO ILLUSTRATE THE MINIMUM CLEARANCES AND DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED. 7. PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FRONT ENTRY. |
| 10/19/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | October 19, 2007 FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT # T07OT02194 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2420 N Treat Ave APPLICANT'S NAME: Douglas Treat PROPERTY OWNER: Doug's Treat LLC The applicant is authorized to use a portion of the flood hazard area in the City of Tucson, Arizona, on the property described as: 2420 N Treat Ave, Tucson, AZ 85716, N60' S259.6' E123' W153' OF SE4 SE4 .20 AC SEC 32-13-14. In a portion of Township 13 South, Range 14 East, Section 32, for remodeling interior and exterior of existing building. The applicant agrees to comply with City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard, and Watercourse Amenities, Safety and Habitat regulations, and are particularly bound by the conditions stated below. Violation of any of the conditions stated or referred to below, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be grounds for revocation of this permit. Responsibility for renewal of this permit, if necessary, is with the applicant. Issuance of this permit does not constitute a waiver of other requirements contained in the Tucson City Code, Land Use Code, or any other Federal, State, County, or local regulation. No use other than as permitted herein is allowed. Additional uses allowed under City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Regulations and Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat regulations require the issuance of an additional Floodplain Use Permit. The following 13 conditions apply to this permit: 1) This permit becomes invalid and is subject to additional floodplain review, if any required development permit changes the configuration of the improvement, or, if there is any further disturbance within the floodplain other than that outlined in this application. This floodplain use permit may be subject to conditions or restrictions designed to reduce or mitigate the potential damage or hazard to life or property resulting from development within the regulatory floodplain, floodway or erosion hazard areas as determined by the project engineer and accepted by the City of Tucson. 2) This parcel lies in a City of Tucson identified 100-year floodplain. Therefore, the proposed development is subject to substantial improvement requirements. Substantial Improvement means any reconstruction, repair, rehabilitation, addition or other improvements of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty (50) percent of the market value of the structure before the "start of construction" of the improvements. This term includes structures, which have incurred "substantial damage" regardless of the actual repair work performed. Per Sec. 26-4.1 Nonconforming development. (a) Improvements to, or Reconstruction of, Existing Nonconforming Development: (1) Any structure which is substantially improved at a cost equal to or exceeding fifty (50) percent of the full cash value of the structure as shown on that latest assessment rolls of the county assessor wither (a) before the improvement or repair is started, or (b) if the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred, shall conform to these regulations. At the time of improvement or reconstructing the structure or development, floodproofing (non-residential structures only) may be considered as one of the means if bringing it in compliance with this chapter. The proposed improvement is considered a substantial improvement since the house is located within a City of Tucson regulated floodplain and does not a have an elevation certificate on file. The cost of the improvements is estimated at $125,172.00. The current assessed value of the structure is $252,345.00. The assessed value of the structure, calculated to be $252,345, was based on a calculation using the percentage of the Pima County's assessor's valuation for the improvements against the land value, (63%) and the affidavit of property value from March 2007, of $400,000. Any cumulative improvements would need to be under a total 50% substantial improvement amount of $126,173. The current proposed improvement is 49.6% of the structure value, so any further improvements would result in other floodplain use permit review, flood proofing design, and/or other substantial improvement requirements. 3) Within 5 (five) days of issuance of this permit, and through completion of the project, notification must be posted and maintained in a conspicuous place on the job site stating "CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDING UNDER REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF TUCSON FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT # T07OT02194 FOR INFORMATION PLEASE CALL 791-5550." 4) This Floodplain Use Permit and plans shall be kept in a readily accessible location on site at all times. 5) Any additional future disturbance of the floodplain shall have separate floodplain use permit applications submitted to this office for review and approval. 6) See the associated activity T07CM02835. This Floodplain Use Permit will be automatically revoked and becomes invalid for non-compliance to conditions set forth in this permit. Also, this permit will expire one year from its date of issue. Renewal of this permit will require a new application, review and approval of that application by the City of Tucson, Development Services Department, Engineering Division. (EXPIRATION DATE) Month: 10 Day: 19 Year: 2008 APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR: Cimarron Circle Construction Company ADDRESS: 4325 E Grant, Tucson, Arizona 85712 PHONE: (520) 881-2777 OWNER: Douglas Staples ADDRESS: 4325 E Grant, Tucson, Arizona 85712 PHONE: (520) 881-2777 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE The applicant is authorized by the City Engineer to receive a floodplain use permit subject to the above referenced conditions and restrictions. |
| 10/19/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Coordinate with the Architect and show how the fan coils are being connected to the building structure. Provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 2. Provide guards for equipment located within 10 feet of a roof edge or of a walking surface that is elevated more than 30 inches above the adjoining grade. Reference Section 304.10, IMC 2006. 3. Provide calculations to show that the common ventilation systems for HP-1 and FC-1 are sized in accordance with Section 403.3.2, IMC 2003. 4. Clarify the tag numbers for FCU-4 and FC-3: are they the same piece of equipment? Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 5. Provide balancing data for FC-3 and FCU-4. Reference Section 403.3.4, IMC 2006. 6. Revise the duct insulation specification (2.09) to comply with Sections 501.2 and 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/22/2007 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/29/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEEDS 8TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/05/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/05/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |