Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T07CM02740
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2008 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. ALL DEFFERED SUBMITTALS, "I" JOISTS, NEED LETTER OF APPROVAL SIGNED BY BUILDING OFFICAL. 2. NEED TO GET LETTER OF APPEAL APPROVED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR USE OF 3/32" HIGH FONTS FOR ALL DRAWINGS 3. WHAT IS BEING WELDED AT DETAIL 202/S-4 4. INSURE 2006 IBC CODE COMPLIANCE |
| 02/06/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | needs addressing review |
| 02/07/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/07/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/07/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2564.81) is less than 12" below the first floor elevation for tenant 3 (2565.3). Provide a backwater valve per Sections 710.1 and 904.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. The scupper width appears to be too short to accommodate the design rainfall without exceeding a 2" depth of flow. Provide calculations to support the scupper design or provide structural calculations to show that the roof is capable of supporting the additional rain load. Reference Sections 1101.11.1 and 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006. 3. The minimum height of a scupper is 4 inches. If the overflow is to use the same opening as the primary roof drain, then the minimum height of the scupper opening shall be 6 inches. Reference Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. |
| 02/12/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: T07CM02349 & T07CM02740 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 12, 2008 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\grading\t07cm02349-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 02/15/2008 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Since it has been determined that, with the firewall, there will be two services to both Building W and Building E, provide the placards required by NEC 230.2 (E). Specify the exact wording on the plans. 2. Since it has been determined that, with the firewall, there will be two services to both Building W and Building E, bond the services together at each building, and to the foundation steel. 3. If as Note 2 on Sheet E2 indicates, all electrical equipment is to be series rated, this implies a 3-tiered system, which is not available commercially. Please specify line side and load side overcurrent protection for each combination such that it is clear what is intended for the higher rating and the lower rating. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE FIRST SUBMITTAL. SERIES RATING 22/10 IS A 2-TIERED SYSTEM, NOT 3-TIERED. IN ANY CASE, THIS IS UNNECESSARY SINCE THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT IS LESS THAN THE FULL RATING OF THE PANELS. FAULT CURRENT NOTE IS CROPPED FROM PLOT. 4. N/A 5. Sign and date seal on new Sheet MPS. Please note that this effects Structural sheets as well. 6. Provide conductor size for HP circuits. |
| 02/29/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Development plan must be approved before the building plans can be approved. |