Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07CM02466
Parcel: 11103181E

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T07CM02466
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/14/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2003.
06/15/2007 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Automatic sprinkler system is required. Please refer to 2003 International Fire Code, Section 903.2.9.
06/15/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Hazen Office Building
T07CM02466
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 18, 2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance.

2. It appears that this project is comprised of three (3) different parcels. There are two (2) options in regards to utilizing the three (3) parcels as one site. Prior to approval of the site plan provide; 1) A Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property, or 2) Provide a site plan for each parcel that shows how the parcels can stand alone and meet the requirements of the LUC if sold separately along with a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property.

3. Add a note to the plan stating "THIS SITE PLAN IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OVERLAY ZONES CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE.

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Provide a property description on the site plan.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide overall dimensions for the proposed building.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The typical handicapped parking space detail shows a pole mounted handicapped sign. Clearly delineate on the plan that this pole mounted sign will not encroach into the minimum sidewalk width of 4'-0".

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide length and width dimensions for the proposed parallel vehicle parking spaces.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Provide a dimension for the northeast entrance PAAL.

9. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Per D.S. 3-05 Table 1 - Motor Vehicle Area Dimensions and LUC Table 3.3.7.I - Motor Vehicle Area Dimensions the minimum width of a parking area access lane (PAAL), when ninety (90) degree parking is proposed, is twenty-four (24) feet. This said, both proposed PAALs do not meet the minimum width.

10. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Demonstrate on the plan how the handicapped parking access aisle gains access to the sidewalk. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13

11. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 A pedestrian access easement will be required for the proposed five (5) foot sidewalk which runs along Cardi Blvd as it jogs on to the property at the north entrance PAAL.

12. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Provide clear heights from finished grade to the bottom of proposed balconies so that zoning can verify that the minimum heights are met.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards.

14. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.14 Fully dimension the proposed loading zone and provide maneuvering areas on the plan. Additional comments maybe forth coming.

15. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.18 Label County Club Road as an MS&R Route.

16. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.19 The existing and future right-of-way (ROW) dimensions do not add up to the fifty (50) foot half shown on the MS&R Map, please clarify.

17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting.

18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.38 Based on the note under "PARKING REQUIRE" it appears that a DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OPTION (DDO) for a reduction in parking has been applied for. Provide the DDO number in the lower right hand corner of the plan near the title block.

19. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 Under the LAND USE: ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, show the square footage for the 1st and 2nd floor along with the total.

20. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

21. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t07cm02466.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
06/18/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied See Zoning Comments
06/18/2007 SSHIELD1 ADA REVIEW Passed
07/02/2007 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. The street landscape border minimum width is ten 10 feet. It is to be located on site and measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line. For information on the location of the MS&R right-of-way line, refer to Sec. 2.8.3.4 of the LUC.

2. There are situations where the LUC allows up to five (5) feet of the required ten 10 feet of landscaping to be located within the right-of-way. The required landscaping may be located within the right-of-way only if there are no utilities within the same area, the required landscaping area is extended only to the back of sidewalk, and the City Engineer's Office approves such use in the right-of-way.

3. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4. (See comment # 6)

4. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. (See comment # 6)

5. The screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirements. The use of vegetation to satisfy the screen requirement is allowed only to provide for alternative treatment and is not in any way meant to imply that the vegetative screen can also be used to meet the landscape requirement. Hedges and other vegetative screens shall not extend more than three (3) feet into the street landscape border

6. A 6' wall is required to screen loading zone from Country Club per LUC Table 3.7.2-I.

7. Indicate the on the landscape plan the type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

8. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.

9. Submit an Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants.

10. All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting.

11. Note: The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

12. Additional comments may apply.
07/02/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied
07/09/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 10, 2007
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM02466
PROJECT NAME: Hazen Office Building
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3314 North Country Club Road
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate

The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN

1. Provide on the plan the general direction of drainage. Provide the symbol used in the legend. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16.

2. Provide flow arrows and locations for all roof down spouts on the site plan. The 10-year flow must be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all down spout locations. Provide scupper at appropriate locations. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16

3. Provide the finish floor elevation of the structure. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16.

4. Provide the estimated cut and fill quantities on the plan. If the quantities are zero, indicate on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17.

5. Country Club Road is designated an arterial road with a full future ROW widening of 100'. It appears the provided future ½ ROW is not correct. A 49' dimension has been provided, which is short by 1'. Please clarify and/or provide a 50' future ½ ROW width for Country Club Road. Revise the future curb, sidewalk and SVT locations appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19., 10.

6. Provide a pedestrian easement for the sidewalk along Cardi Blvd. that enters into the property. Provide docket and page on the plan and indicate the easement will be public. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11.

7. It appears the sidewalk that connects the structure to the sidewalk within the ROW along Country Club Road does not continue to the entrance of the structure. The site plan must clearly show pedestrian access from the structure to the sidewalk within the ROW. Revise appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11.

8. Provide pedestrian circulation with a 4' sidewalk to Cardi Blvd. DS 2-08.3.0.

9. Provide a description for each easement on the easement table. Also indicate if the easement is public or private. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20.

10. Show the loading vehicle maneuverability for the required loading space. The minimum requirements for a 30' single unit vehicle is an outside radius of 42' and inside radius of 28'. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/16/2007 THAUSER1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/16/2007 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed