Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T07CM02433
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/2007 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: December 11, 2007 SUBJECT: Whataburger Site Plan (T07CM02433) and Grading (T07BU01296) TO: Kimley Horne and Associates - Darren Watson LOCATION: 6504 E 22nd Street T14S, R15E, Section 19 REVIEWER: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM02433 and T07BU01296 (Third Review) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Site Plan and Grading Plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division recommends conditional approval of the Site Plan or Grading Plan at this time. The Site Plan and Grading plan can be approved one revided copy of plans have been submitted with revisions including water harvesting openings, curb returns (25'), wider entrance and recordation information for road. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 12/12/2007 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | NEED SHEETS K2.1 AND K3.1 WITH 1/8" LETTERING |
| 12/12/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/13/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Fan note 10/M4.2 calls out, "See electrical drawings for fan interlocking and control" for the restroom fans. The electrical drawings in turn call for the fans to be controlled by an occupancy sensor. Unless the restroom is continuously occupied, when no one is occupying the rooms, the air supplied to the restrooms will be recirculated. The recirculation of ventilation air from toilet rooms is prohibited. Reference Section 403.2.1 (3), IMC 2003. 2. Comment not addressed. The shop drawings for KH-2 indicate a wall bracket (Detail B/H2.3) and a note that "all ventilators are equipped with hanging brackets" (Note 8/H2.2). No connection to the fryer assembly is indicated on the shop drawings. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood, KH-2, is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2003. |
| 12/17/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The approved version of the site plan shows the location of a backwater valve adjacent to the street. Coordinate the plumbing plans and provide the additional venting required by Section 904.1, UPC 2003. |
| 12/18/2007 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Provide cut sheets for all exterior lighting fixtures. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE REVIEWS OF 7/9/07 AND 11/6/07. Include flag pole light, roof-mounted flood lights (Fixture N), and rooftop compact fluorescent (Fixture K) cut sheets in the next submittal. RESPONSE LETTER OF 12/10/07 INDICATES THAT NO FLAG POLE LIGHT NOR ROOF MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN. TWO FLAG POLE LIGHTS ARE ON SHEET MPE.1. SHEET E3.1 ELECTRICAL ROOF PLAN STILL HAS ROOF MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHTS. PLEASE CLARIFY. 2. Demonstrate compliance with the Tucson Lighting Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/Tucson_Lighting_Code.pdf. Please note that the information required by Section 8 shall be ON THE PLANS. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE REVIEWS OF 7/9/07 AND 11/6/07. PLEASE MODIFY/ELIMINATE THE NOTE ON SHEET MPE1.2 WHICH REFERENCES THE 2006 LIGHTING CODE. 3. Please add flag pole lights, roof-mounted flood lights (Fixture N) and rooftop compact fluorescent (Fixture K) to total lumen count. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE REVIEWS OF 7/9/07 AND 11/6/07. RESPONSE LETTER OF 12/10/07 INDICATES THAT NO FLAG POLE LIGHT NOR ROOF MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN. TWO FLAG POLE LIGHTS ARE ON SHEET MPE.1. SHEET E3.1 ELECTRICAL ROOF PLAN STILL HAS ROOF MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHTS. PLEASE CLARIFY. 4. Please provide manufacturer documentation that the 400W metal halide fixtures have 20500 mean lumens, and that the 175W metal halide wall packs have 9300 mean lumens. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE REVIEW OF 11/6/07. CUT SHEETS FOR FIXTURES W AND V INDICATE MEAN (hor) LUMENS OF 7400 AND 22100, RESPECTIVELY. SCHEDULE ON SHEET MPE1.2 INDICATES 9300 AND 20500 LUMENS RESPECTIVELY. PLEASE CLARIFY, AND NOTE THAT USING THE CUT SHEET MEAN LUMENS GIVES A TOTAL OF 213,700, WHICH EXCEEDS THE ALLOWABLE 210,000. 5. Please add the following note on the plans: "Special Inspection required per the Tucson Lighting Code, Section 16." Provide Interior Lighting Power Allowances calculations per the 2003 IECC. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. 6. Equipment 64, a single phase multiplex pump, is new on the Electrical Kitchen Equipment Schedule, but does not appear to have an electrical circuit. 7. Equipment 95, as depicted in Rev Triangle 2 of the current submittal, has been changed from 3-phase to single phase. However, it is still 3-phase according to Panel A. 8. Specify the grounding of the telephone system. Reference NEC 800.100. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. 9. Ckt L3-4 is used twice, once on the Office Power/Data Detail, and once on the Electrical Power Plan. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. 10. Emergency lighting appears to violate NEC 700.12 (F), which requires such equipment to be fed from the same branch circuits as feed normal lighting in the respective area. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. |
| 12/24/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1:WHATABURGER:ISSUED W/GREASE INTERCEPTOR 2: 1 CPT SINK & 3 CPT SINKS ARE INDIRECT TO FLOOR SINKS 3: NO WWM PLBG FIXTURE CREDIT GIVEN-NO DEMO DRAWINGS SUBMITTED- NEEDS WWM 8TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION IF APPLICABLE-740-6500. 4:NEED WASTEWATER IWC REVIEW OF 1-4" EXTERIOR DUMPSTER DRAIN: TOM TOMCHAK 579-5771 5025 W INA RD |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2008 | VFLORES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/02/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |