Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07CM02433
Parcel: 135020260

Address:
6504 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T07CM02433
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/13/2007 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/14/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2003.
06/25/2007 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall
Senior Planner

PROJECT: T07CM02433
6504 E. 22nd Street, New Whataburger (rebuild from demo)
Commercial Site Plan

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 06/26/2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS), American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and International Building Codes 2003 (IBC). Specifically, this plan was reviewed for compliance with requirements listed in DS 2-02.

2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.2, please provide the legal description of the property. It appears that two parcels are involved in this project. Please provide a copy of a lot combination form that is recorded, and the lot combination covenant that is recorded - with recordation receipt.

3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.4, please provide the adjacent township, range and sections on the location map. Due to small print possibly effecting the microfilming of records, please remove the various parcels and all streets other than 22nd, Wilmot and Avenida Polar.

4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.5, please provide the lot dimensions on sheet C-2 (I see them on sheet C-1)

5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.6, with regards to the building:
A) dimension footprint
B) call out building height and roof type (from grade to flat roof plus the parapet wall height or grade to midpoint pitch)
C) dimension any roof overhangs, pop-out entrances and/or awnings with dashed line & give vertical clearances
D) keynote pick up window location
E) call out a 1' setback from the PAAL drive thru lane to the building and menu board
F) for records, declare provided setback from future curb of 22nd to face of building

6. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7, please list required building setbacks per code. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7, please list required building setbacks per code.

7. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, with regards to parking:
A) please provide distance of wheel stop to front of space (fully contained within 2'6")
B) please revise handicapped parking detail on sheet 4 to show min. width of smaller access aisle at 5' per ANSI 502.4.2.
C) please provide a note on handicapped sign detail on sheet 4 that illegal parking is a $518.00 fine
D) please provide a van accessible sign on the handicapped sign detail on sheet 4 for those parking spaces that are van accessible
E) please keynote the handicapped sign location on the site plan (they appear to be by the ramps, in front of the space?)
F) please keynote (what appear to be ) bollards near the handicapped access aisle

8. Per DS 2-02.2.1.9, with regards to bicycle parking:
A) please dimension that the bike parking is within 50' of entrance (I scaled it, it's fine)

9. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, with regards to the drive thru lane and adjacent "break away lane"
A) per DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.a - provide a separation between the lanes - rolled curbing, etc.
B) per DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 - a one way PAAL is a minimum of 12' wide
C) per DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 - a minimum 2' separation is required from the one way PAAL to south property line
D) provide arrows and indicate one way PAAL only for break away lane
E) provide "drive through lane only" signage (painted asphalt sign okay)

10. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12, with regards to pedestrian and handicapped access;
A) please dimension widths of all sidewalks and crosswalks - also around bicycle parking
B) per DS 2-08.3.1, provide sidewalk to dumpster - cannot cross loading zone
C) please call out the location of any other entries/exits on the building, even for employee use only. Appropriate pedestrian access must be provided to those entries.
D) Please call out that all sidewalks are physically separated from the PAAL - either raised or with a curb separation - please keynote or provide symbol sidewalk elevated

11. Per DS 2-02.2.1.13, please provide height and dimensions of menu board sign and location of any directional signs.

12. Per DS 2-02.2.1.14, provide maneuvering diagram for loading zone.

13. Per DS 2-02.2.1.19, please dimension distance from Center line of 22nd to future Curb location, from future curb to property line.

14. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20, please show all easements with type and recordation.

15. Per DS 2-02.2.1.25, please show any free-standing lighting location, with base width and vertical clearances of at least 15'.

16. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.2, provide floor area ratio of building to site (lot coverage is generally for residential uses)

17. Please note that depending upon the responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. Should you have any questions on this review, please contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951 (520).



HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T07CM02433 6504 e 22nd whataburger.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
06/28/2007 HEATHER THRALL ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied Please see zoning review comments.
06/29/2007 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. A 6' wall is required to screen loading zone from 22nd St. per LUC Table 3.7.2-I.

2. Note: The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

3. Additional comments may apply.
06/29/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved Exception
07/30/2007 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Kimmerly-Horn and Assoc., Inc. DATE: August 7, 2007
Darren M. Watson
2210 E. Fort Lowell Road
Tucson, Arizona 85719

SUBJECT: Whatabuger, 6504 E. 22nd Street
Site plan T07CM02433 and Grading plan T07BU01296 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 19

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Grading Plan.

The Site Plan (SP) and Grading plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. If you are proposing combining the Site plan and the Grading plan in one set, then the set must be clearly labeled "Site - Grading plan". Also for this round of Site and Grading comments, the revisions or changes noted, may be made on the proposed "Site - Grading plan" set. Address as required.
3. Edit note 21 to read "…….City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 Excavation and Grading"
4. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
5. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
6. Provide COT standard vertical curbs in the public right-of-way. See comment no. 18.
7. Show all material indications in the legend i.e.: concrete paving.
8. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6.
9. Proposed sidewalks on Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan shall be 6' in width per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
10. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
11. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. The refuse vehicle can only reverse a max. forty feet in a straight line to exit from the enclosure. Revise as required.
12. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Label as the future as well as the existing right-of-way.
13. Sidewalks, curbs and wheelchair ramps are required where applicable per D.S. 3-01.3.0 and installed with "Detectable Warnings" per ADAAG.
14. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
15. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. The Bench Mark description shall also note where the bench mark is located.
16. Show Site plan number (T07CM02433) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
17. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The refuse container enclosure requires side bollards, the min. width of the enclosure is 10'x10' from front to back and from side to side, bollard to bollard. See comment no. 8.
18. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
19. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.

Grading Plan:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP.
2. Provide COT standard vertical curbs in the public right-of-way. See comment no. 11.
3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
4. Add the following notes to the grading plan notes:
· "The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work."

· "The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of the detention/retention basin and scarify the basin bottom once the construction activities are completed in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation."

· "Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it."

5. List Grading plan (T07BU01296) number on the plans.
6. Show all symbols in the legend (concrete paving areas).
7. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, add a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed.
8. Call out surface paving material.
9. Curb and Gutter elevation include drainage flow with percent slope.
10. Show details of all surface materials.
11. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
12. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line.
13. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site.

Drainage Statement:
1. The DS has been accepted by engineering.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/6504 E. 22nd St. Site-Grading

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/08/2007 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/08/2007 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed