Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T07CM02349
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2007 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 06/11/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide site drawing showing the size, material, route, and slope of the building sewer. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 2. Provide site drawing showing the size, material, and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 3. Provide the listing for the two-way cleanout fitting called out on sheet MP1. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 707.6, UPC 2003. 4. Show that the designs for the openings of the sleeved gas pipe vent are capable of preventing the entrance of water or insects. Reference Section 1211.1.6, UPC 2003. 5. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans (including the design of the scuppers, collection boxes, and downspouts). Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference Section 1106.0, UPC 2003. |
| 06/11/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the shell building envelope. Reference Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2003. 2. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference Section 104.2, IECC 2003. |
| 06/11/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1" water meter will be allowed for this project (a demand of 45 GPM creates an excessive pressure drop with a 1" water meter) |
| 06/12/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/12/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: T07CM02349 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 12, 2007 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. The development plan will need to be reviewed as a site plan. This review can be done over the counter. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\grading\t07cm02349.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 06/27/2007 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Architectural and Structural drawings do not provide for design and buildout of 2-hour firewall, as shown on Electrical drawings. The issue is with NEC 230.2, Number of Services (to a building). Please coordinate among disciplines and clarify. 2. Provide cut sheets for all outdoor lighting fixtures. 3. There is an un-accounted fixture mounted just west of Service A. Account for on Lighting Fixture Schedule and on Outdoor Lighting Code Compliance Calculations. 4. This is in Lighting Area E3a, not E3. See Page 15: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/Tucson_Lighting_Code.pdf. It does not appear that the fixtures proposed will comply. 5. Electrical Plans Sheet E2 refer to Building W as West and Building E as East. On Sheets DP1.1 and DP1.2. Building E is on the west and Building W is on the east. Please coordinate among disciplines and clarify. 6. There is lighting on A-2 on the Electrical Plan. This is a spare on the panel schedule. 7. Some of the fixtures on the circuit referenced in Comment #6 above appear to be powered from A-4. This is also a spare. Please clarify. 8. There is a receptacle on A-6 on the Electrical Plan. This is a spare on the panel schedule. 9. AC unit is designated as "FUTURE" on Sheet MP1. No such future designation on Electrical. Please coordinate among disciplines and clarify. 10. Please fill in the electrical load information for the Sign powered from Panel A in the column for electrical loads. 11. Circuits indicated on Panel A schedule do not correspond to Electrical Plan. 12. Regarding Comments 6-11 above, check the circuitry on Panels B, C, and D for proper electrical loads and correspondence between panel schedules and Electrical Plans. 13. For Service B, 6.2 A does not appear to be a reasonable load. Please note that the tallys on the panel schedules will be used to determine Code compliance, as the separate Load Calculations are not in a format that reflects the requirements of Article 220 of the NEC. 14. Demonstrate compliance with the 2003 IECC. 15. Size the Grounding Electrode Conductor per NEC Table 250.66, #4, not #6. 16. If as Note 2 on Sheet E2 indicates, all electrical equipment is to be series rated, this implies a 3-tiered system, which is not available commercially. Please specify line side and load side overcurrent protection for each combination such that it is clear what is intended for the higher rating and the lower rating. 17. Have the Permit Clerks provide designations for Services A and B, or Services C and D, on their respective Activity Numbers. This shall show up under Location in Permits Plus. |
| 07/09/2007 | LEERAY HANLY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Please add applicable codes to plan set. Note that we are currently under the 2006 IBC, IMC, IECC, and IFC; the 2005 NEC; and the 2003 UPC and 2003 ANSI accessibility code. 2) Modify Code Review to show Bldg "W" as 3000 sq.ft with 6000 sq.ft allowable and Bldg "E" as 4000 sq.ft with 9000 sq.ft allowable. 3) Electrical pages are showing 2 hr demising walls whereas your architectural and strucural pages correctly indicate that there are no demising wall in a shell building. Please coordinate the references. 4) PP A1 references the 1999 ADAAG. The reference should be to the 2003 ANSI 117.1. 5) Structual GSN's and details to be min 1/8" font. 6) Structural calculations for shear wall on line 'b' at building "E" call for #5 reinforcement 8" oc with 2#6 at corners. Please add keynote 5 from pp S2.3 to keynotes on pp S2.1 and add additional keynote on pp S2.1 indicating location of additional 8" oc vertical reinforcement at indicated shear wall. 7) Please add proprietary information to joist schedule pp S1.3 (ie..TJI/L65) per structural submittal. 8) Keynotes 7,8 pp S2.2 and keynote 7 pp S2.3 call for joists with an additional axial load. These additional joists do not appear to be addressed in the submittal. Questions? Contact: LeeRay Hanly Senior Building Inspector 520-837-4908 office 520-909-5154 cell LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/12/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | needs addressing review |
| 07/27/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The building plan cannot be approved until the site plan is approved. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/17/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 08/17/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/17/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |