Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T07CM02345
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/08/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/08/2007 | CHRIS KIEL (WILDAN) | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THE TYPE OF USE FOR THE PREVIOUS CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IN ORDER TO DETERMINE IF THE CURRENT USE IS NOT A CHANGE OF USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 106.1.1 OF THE 2003 IBC. IF IT IS A CHANGE OF USE, PLEASE COMPLY WITH SECTION 3406 OF THE 2003 IBC. 2) PLEASE PROVIDE A MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE SIDE EXITS TO THE PUBLIC WAY PER SECTION 1003.6 OF THE 2003 IBC. IF THIS IS A CHANGE OF USE, ENSURE THAT IT IS ALSO ACCESSIBLE. 3) IF THIS IS A CHANGE OF USE, PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TOILET ROOMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 29 OF THE 2003 IBC. 4) PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE HALLWAY OUTSIDE THE TOILET ROOM IS A MINIMUM OF 36" PER SECTION 1005 OF THE 2003 IBC AND SECTION 403.5 OF ANSI 117.1-2003. |
| 06/08/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/08/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/08/2007 | ANY | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/12/2007 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T07CM02345 6/8/07 1. See Building Comment #1 and coordinate regarding occupancy. It remains to be determined whether this is a change of use/occupancy. The 2003 IECC may apply. 2. Demonstrate that this location does not need to be classified according to the requirements of NEC 500. Otherwise, design per NEC 502. 3. If this is to be a manufacturing facility, it may be conceivable that the demand factors used for Panel B are too liberal. However, if in the judgement of the Electrical Engineer the anticipated use would render such factors appropriate, the Plans Examiner will accept such judgement. Please revisit as necessary. |
| 06/12/2007 | GBONILL1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 06/12/2007 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 06/12/2007 | GBONILL1 | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |