Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07CM02181
Parcel: 12504079A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T07CM02181
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/29/2007 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied The architectural site plan (AS101) appears to be incomplete. Revise the plan to show the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
06/01/2007 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide legible drawings. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
2. Provide energy code compliance calculations (envelope, mechanical, and lighting). Reference Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code
3. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference Section 401.2, IMC 2003.2003.
4. Provide information to show that the ventilation for the enclosed parking garage complies with Section 404, IMC 2003 for controls, minimum ventilation, and for air pressure control of occupied spaces accessory to the parking garage.
5. Terminate condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2003, as amended by the City of Tucson. (see HVAC General Specification #26, M-001 and detail 4/MP-401)
6. At a minimum, provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections, for all air distribution systems with a capacity greater than 2,000 CFM (see HVAC General Specification #8, M-001). Coordinate with note #7 in the Packaged Roof Top Unit Schedule, sheet M-400. Reference Section 606.1, IMC 2003.
7. The minimum insulation for ducts located in unconditioned spaces within the building envelope is R-5 (installed). Reference Section 803.2.8, IECC 2003. (see HVAC General Specification #21, M-001)
8. Exhaust fan EX-1 is scheduled for a maximum air flow of 5,000 CFM but is connected to three dryers, each exhausting 2800 CFM. Clarify how this is to be balanced. Coordinate detail 5/M-304 with the proposed design. Reference Sections 106.3.1 and 504.7, IMC 2003.
9. Provide a minimum of 6" clearance from the commercial dryer exhaust duct to combustibles. Reference Section 504.7, IMC 2003.
10. Revise the design of the terminations for the 22" and 7" dryer exhaust ducts to comply with Section 504.4, IMC 2003.
11. Show the location of the dryer that is to be attached to the 4" dryer exhaust duct on the second floor. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2003.
12. Show that the termination of the vents for the gas-fired water heaters, GWH-1 and GWH-2, comply with Section 503.6.6, IFGC 2003.
13. Show the size, route, and termination of the pool water heater vent. Reference Section 106.3.1, IFGC 2003.
14. Provide information to show that sufficient combustion air has been provided for the boilers and the pool water heater. Reference Sections 106.3.1 and 304, IFGC 2003.
06/01/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide legible drawings. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
2. A permanently legible imprint of the registrant's seal and signature shall appear on either the cover, title, index page, or first sheet of each set of project specifications. Reference Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.
3. This project is under the jurisdiction of the City of Tucson, not the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (detail 1/MP-406).
4. Provide sheet P2.2, referenced in detail 6/MP406. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
5. Provide Division 11, Equipment, in the project manual; it appears to be missing. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
6. Provide the listing and manufacturer's installation information for the commercial clotheswashers. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
7. Clarify the plumbing design and provide equipment data for room 105, Guest Clean. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
8. The use of a single stack DWV system with unvented branch lines is not allowed per Section 311.4, UPC 2003. Provide documentation to justify the equivalency of this DWV system in an appeal to the building official. Reference Section 301.2, UPC 2003.
9. The use of an air admittance valve for use with an ejector pump and sump assembly does not meet the listing requirements of the either the sump assembly or the air admittance valve. A vent to atmosphere shall be used. Reference Sections 310.4 and 710.7, UPC 2003.
10. Revise the design of ejector pump EJP-1 per the requirements of Section 710.3.3, UPC 2003.
11. Provide access and a maintenance platform for the reduced pressure zone backflow preventer located above the ceiling in room 121. Reference Section 603.3.4, UPC 2003.
12. Clarify the proposed use for the galvanized pans located in the "Refresh" rooms on floors 2 - 7. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
13. Revise (complete) the water, storm, and sanitary riser diagrams (sheets MP-300, MP-301, and MP-302) to indicate their locations in the building. Provide the condensate riser diagrams noted on sheet MP-302. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
14. Indicate the sizes of all of the sanitary waste and vent piping on the sanitary riser diagrams. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
15. The primary roof drains shall not discharge over any barrier-free pedestrian access (e.g. sidewalks). Reference Sections 2.8 and 4.4 F, City of Tucson Development Standard No. 3-01.0. http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/DevStd301.pdf
16. Show how secondary roof drainage is being provided. Reference Section 1101.11.2, UPC 2003.
17. Include the developed pipe lengths for the natural gas piping on the plans. Reference Section 1217.0, UPC 2003.
18. Clarify the design of the grease waste piping as shown on sheet MP-100. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
19. The maximum approved rate of flow for a grease trap is 55 GPM. Provide documentation to justify the installation of the proposed grease trap in an appeal to the building official. Reference Section 1014.2, UPC 2003.
20. Not more than 4 separate fixtures shall be connected to a single grease trap. Reference Section 1014.4, UPC 2003.
21. The design of the water heater piping, as shown on sheet MP-400, with a valve located between the hot water storage tank and the expansion tank, makes it impossible for the expansion tank to accommodate the thermal expansion of the water in the water heater, as intended by Section 608.3, UPC 2003. Reference Section 505.6, UPC 2003.
22. Provide (and show on the drawing) temperature and pressure relief for the hot water storage tanks. Show the size, route, and termination point of the relief piping. Reference Sections 505.6 and 608.3, UPC 2003.
23. Provide water pressure relief valves for the water heaters, GWH-1 and GWH-2. Show the size, route, and termination point of the relief piping. Reference Section 608.6, UPC 2003.
24. Show the location of the dishwasher and its booster heater (detail 4/MP-406) on the plumbing plans. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
06/04/2007 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/12/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: T07CM02181
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 12, 2007

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\grading\t07cm02181.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
06/13/2007 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Mechanical Engineer shall clarify circuit requirements MCA and MOCP, for AC units, before Code review. Which slash rating is applicable to the unit specified. Reference Sheet M-400, AC Unit System Schedule.
2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
3. Please clear up the "overwrites" on the plans, where letters overwrite other letters on the plotted drawings.
4. Sheets E-101L and E-101LA not yet reviewed. Provide panel and circuit number for all electrical loads. All lettering minimum font size 1/8". Eliminate overwrites.
5. It appears that Ckt MECH-B (39,41) powers SAC-2, not a spare.
6. Each elevator car shall have a separate branch circuit to supply its lights and receptacles. It appears that LP-A (15) supplies the car for one elevator on Sheet E-100P and the pit for the other. Comply with all requirements of NEC 620.22, 620.24, and 620.53, and distinguish elevator car from elevator pit on the panel schedule. Applicable to all elevators, this project.
7. A separate branch circuit shall supply the elevator machine room lighting and receptacle. Comply with all requirements of NEC 620.23.
8. Clarify the intent of the junction boxes in the Elevator Machine Room.
9. Please relocate any receptacles less than 10' from the inside wall of the pool. Reference NEC 680.22 (A) (2).
10. Clarify the intent of the junction boxes on Ckts RP-B (28) and (29). Reference Sheet E-101P.
11. Specify the bonding required by NEC 680.26.
12. Ckt RP-A (29) has 3 quads on Sheet E-101P. Could not be .9VA, as stated on panel schedule. Please correct in this case and all which may apply.
13. SAC-1 requires a 15A circuit breaker, max. However, 3-RP-A1 is a 20A circuit.
14. Show the disconnecting means for RTU-3 on the plans. Specify fusing not to exceed 35A. Reference NEC 439 Part IX, and schedule for mechanical equipment. Typical for all RTUs for which this applies.
15. Provide feeder sizes for RTUs.
16. The RTUs are rated at 230V according to the mechanical schedule. Electrical provides 208V. Coordinate with Mechanical and clarify.
17. Clarify Provide panel and circuit number for the electrical loads on Sheets E-201 and E-202.
18. Washer/Extractor specified on Sheet E-203 is 208/3/7.5 HP. This should draw aprox. 24A. Please reconsider the 20A Circuit, and the 3.23 VA on the panel schedule.
19. Air Compressor specified on Sheet E-203 is 115/1/2 HP. This should draw aprox. 24A. Please reconsider the 15A specified, and true size of this motor.
20. Provide a disconnecting means for the Ice Machine and Remote Compressor (Walk-in Cooler). Reference NEC 422.31, 430 Part IX.
21. Provide electrical circuits for the bakery case, Equipment E-17A..
22. Provide electrical loads on panel schedule, for Ckts EM-B 21,23, EM-B 25,27,29, and KP-11.
23. Please reconcile the power requirements on the Electrical Connection Schedule, Sheet E-204 with those on the panel schedule for Ckt KP-8,10,12. If this 3-phase Convection Oven is indeed 5 KW, then its current draw would be 13.9A; the 30A circuit breaker would be oversized per NEC 240.6 (A) and 422.11 (E) (3).
24. Please reconcile the power requirements on the Electrical Connection Schedule, Sheet E-204 with those on the panel schedule for Ckt KP-7.
25. Electrical Connection Schedule, Sheet E-204 specifies a Soda Machine as Equipment E-2.
26. Provide listing information on the generator.
27. Submit catalogue cut sheets for all exterior lighting, including cold cathode. Special attention will be given to the lumen count per linear foot for the cold cathode lighting.
28. The sign on the first floor level on the North Elevation Sheet E-700 is to have an illuminated face. Please show the lighting fixtures.
29. Please add Fixture JD-2 to the lumen calculations on Sheet STLG-100. Reference Sheet E-101LA.
30. Could not find fixtures BH and JD-1 on the plans, but they are included in the lumen calculations.
31. Note that JD-1 can not be counted as a shielded fixture for the purpose of the lumen calculations, since it is an "uplight." Reference fixture schedule Sheet STLG-100.
32. In the lumen calculation, please note that (4) (14000) = 56000, not 34,560. Could be over the total allowed lumens for this site. However, this site is zoned for Commercial, not Residential, and this will help when you rework these calculations.
33. Provide a detail for the pole and foundation for Fixture GG. If the pole is greater than 20' in height, such details, and calculations for both pole and foundation, shall be sealed by a Registered Structural Engineer.
34. Panel RP-A appears to draw 244A total for both sections, overloading the 200A panel.
35. According to the Electrical Riser Diagram, the following panels are shown to be connected to MDP: MDP-3, EM, EM-B, TELE, OLP. Not consistent with panel schedules.
36. Panel TELE is powered from Panel EM according to the Electrical Riser Diagram. However, it is on Panel EM-MDPs schedule. Please clarify.
37. Panel OLP is powered from Panel EM-B according to the Electrical Riser Diagram. However, it is on Panel EM-MDPs schedule. Please clarify.
38. One Elevator is powered from Panel EM according to the Electrical Riser Diagram, and another is powered from MDP. If this is the case, show this on the panel schedules.
39. It appears that Panel EM-MDP is overloaded, even at 366.48KVA, or 1018A, which exceeds its 1000A rating. This does not even include an additional 25% for continuous loading. However, the ATS circuits for Panels EM and EM-B appear to be redundant, if not confusing because they contain different loads from those on the panels themselves. Please clarify all loading and switching arrangements.
40. Panel EM-MDP does not have any normal power, if the switching arrangements on the Electrical Riser Diagram are followed out. Please clarify intent. Are the two elevators on this panel, GF-1 and GF-2 only to operate on generator power?
41. Switchgear Specification Tags are not used on Electrical Riser Diagram. Please do so.
42. Conduit 1200 shall have no smaller than 2/0 EGC in each parallel set. Reference NEC Table 250.66.
43. The 250 KW Generator does not appear to be large enough for the 1000+ ampere load on Panel EM-MDP.
44. Not known why Panel EM would be on Conduit 400 for normal power and Conduit 600 for emergency power, or why the Fire Pump would be on Conduit 1600 for normal power and Conduit 400 for emergency power.
45. Provide sizing for the service disconnecting means for both the Fire Pump side and the other side.
46. If Conduit 4000 is intended to include a 4/0 GMD in each conduit, this would consist of a redundant path to ground and should be removed. The fourth 600 MCM conductor will serve as a path back to the source in the line side of the service disconnects.
47. Panels have mains on the Electrical Riser Diagram, but are Main Lugs Only according to their panel schedules. Please clarify intent.
48. Please provide the sizing for the Main Bonding Jumper for this service. (10) (600) (0.125) = 750 MCM. Reference NEC 250.28 (D).
49. Provide location of utility transformer on Electrical Site Plan.
50. Provide utility available fault current and fault calculations.
51. Provide location for Fire Pump on plans. Fire Pump review incomplete.
52. Mark the ATSs in the Main Electrical Room, Sheet E-200.
53. Fire Pump CT Cabinet as depicted in Main Electrical Room layout does not correspond to Electrical Riser Diagram. Show location for all Fire Pump related equipment.
54. Indicate nature of UPS, rectifier, and battery circuits. Voltage, current, and power. Address UPS as a derived system.
06/19/2007 WILDAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied June 18, 2007

City of Tucson Development Services
201 N. Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ 85701

RE: ALOFT – 1ST REVIEW
CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T07CM02181
WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-7053

The initial review for the above project has been completed. This letter contains comments which need to be addressed by written responses to each which indicate any actions taken. In order to facilitate a shorter second review, all corrections and revisions must be made on the original plans and two complete new sets of prints, along with one complete redlined set, must be returned to our office. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets, and that all changes have been highlighted with appropriate revision numbers, revision dates, and “cloud bubbles.” Pen or pencil corrections on final prints are not acceptable.

This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2003 IRC, 1997 UAC, 2003 IMC, 2003 IECC, 2002 NEC codes with local modifications, and the 2003 UPC with State of Arizona Amendments. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner Chris Kiel.

Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms
R1/A2/S2 ? 1B ? Yes Yes

Special Inspection is required for the following items:
Concrete Construction
Tendon Stressing
Masonry
Epoxy and Grouted Embeds
Field Welding
High Strength Bolting
Seismic Resistance

The following items are acceptable for deferred submittals:
Tendon Elongation and Layout Plans
Steel Connections
Steel Roof Deck
Composite Steel Deck

GENERAL COMMENTS:
Revise all plan sheets to conform to the City of Tucson policy requiring 1/8” text capitalized.

All food service and black dog studio sheets to be sealed by a registrant licensed in the State of Arizona for compliance of finishes, materials, and accessibility requirements of the IBC for these occupancies and building type.

ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
Sheet A000
Indicate on plans the required fire separations between occupancies and identify locations on all applicable plans sheets. Reference section 302.3 IBC

Specify the number of accessible units with roll-in showers per Table 1101.6.1.1 IBC. Note: all ADA units are to be accessible units as defined by the IBC and ANSI A117.1 2003 edition.

Provide calculations for mixed uses including accessory uses in basement. Reference section 302.3 IBC.

Revise building area table to include the porte coche area.

Provide a plumbing fixture schedule showing compliance with Table 2902.1 IBC

Include occupant load calculations and exit width requirements for exits and stairs. Reference section 106.1 IBC.

Sheet AS101
Clearly identify proximity of buildings to property lines for the proposed hotel for purposes of determining exterior wall protection. Reference Table 602 IBC.

Provide accessible parking ratio approved by the city to include the underground parking garage. Reference section 1106 IBC.

Show accessible rout to the public way from all exit discharges. Reference section 1023.6 IBC.

General all LS Sheets
Plans do not reflect the type of fire separations i.e.. fire barrier, partition etc. Reference section 106.1 IBC. Revise plans.

Show on plans the required occupancy separations from the A2/ B/R1/S2 occupancies. Reference section 302.3 IBC.

Sheet LS100
What is the proposed use adjacent to the electrical room? If storage please identify. Reference section 106.1.1 IBC.

Show on plans the travel distances and common path of travel distances to the stairway enclosures. Reference sections 1013 and 1015 IBC.

Provide exit access and required exit widths to the exit enclosures. Reference sections 1005, 1007, 1013 IBC.

Sheet A108
The floor plan does not reflect the stairs to the roof. Please show and detail on plans. Reference section 106.1 IBC.

Sheet A300
The porte coche as detailed on sheet A505 is to be constructed as a Type 1B structure per Table 601 IBC. Revise all building elements as required by this table to the specific fire resistive construction.

The structural elements for the WXYZ Roof structure is not shown to be protected as required by Table 601 IBC as detailed on Sheet A505. Revise plans.

Sheet A400
Sheet to be sealed by an Arizona registrant licensed to practice in Arizona as specified in Arizona board of technical registration rules.

Sheet A401A
Show protection of openings for the fire barrier between the A and R occupancies as required by section 302.3 IBC. Note see sidelight and door opening at corridor 100.

Sheet A420
The pool toilet does not comply with the required maneuvering clearances for the water closet per section 604.3.2 A117.1 ANSI. Revise plan. Note: the lavatory may not encroach into the required space.

Sheet A432
Specify on plans or within the specifications construction of the view ports shall comply with section 715.3.3 Exception 1 IBC.

Revise toilet paper dispenser location per section 604.7 A117.1 ANSI. Revise all applicable sheets. This applies to all accessible facilities.

Provide a vertical grab bar at he sidewall of the water closet as specified in section 604.7 A117.1 ANSI. Revise all applicable sheets. Note: this applies to all accessible water closets.

Show control wall location on floor plan, detail 1. Revise all sheets applicable. Reference section 607.5 IBC.

Detail the grab bar location on plans or provide appropriate reference to accessible detail sheets. Reference section 608 A117.1 ANSI. Revise all applicable sheets.

Provide lavatory reach and clearance elevations for the proposed accessible units. Reference section 608 A117.1 ANSI.

Provide a hand shower with hose per section 608.6 A117.1 ANSI.

Specify on plans and coordinate with plumbing plans that a maximum of 120-degree temperature shall be provide to the showers. Reference section 608.9 A117.1 ANSI.

Sheet A433
See comments for Sheet A432

Sheet A505
See previous comment for sheet A300.
Sheet A506
Plans do not reflect the required fire protection of structural members required for Type 1 B construction. Revise plans. Reference Table 601 IBC. See detail 3

All exterior wood sheathing and blocking to be fire retardant wood per section 603.1 IBC. Revise all applicable plan sheets to reflect the required fire retardant wood.

Sheet A507
Plans do not reflect the required fire protection of structural members required for Type 1 B construction. Revise plans. Reference Table 601 IBC. See details 1 and 2

Sheet A606
Details conflict with ADA room floor plans. Please clarify. Reference section 106.1 IBC.

Sheet A620
Provide a complete door schedule indicating door location, type, hardware, fire resistance, and u rating. Reference section 106.1 IBC.

Sheet A700
Clarify dimensions of the roof access is in compliance section 1009.12.1 IBC.

Detail required barrier and signage required for the stairway that continues below the exit discharge. Reference section 1019.1.6 IBC.

Detail on plans the required signage for the stairways as required by section 1019.1.7 IBC.

Please clarify how the ventilation for the stairway enclosures is in compliance with section 3004 IBC.

Sheet A702
Provide details and sizing of hoist way vents per section 3004 IBC.

STRUCTURAL COMMENTS:
General
Currently, there are no section cuts for the slab bearing conditions at the elevator walls. Is detail 2/S701 the intended typical detail for these areas? Please clarify. Reference IBC 106.1

Please indicate the requirements for special inspection of grout-embedded rebar into the existing structure. Reference IBC 106.1

It appeared that we did not receive the soils report for this project. Please provide two complete copies of the soils report upon the second submittal. Ref IBC 106.1

Sheet S101B
The beam along gridline F.5 east of x.2 appears to not be labeled. Is this to be B12 or B10? Please clarify. Reference IBC 106.1

Sheet S102
Please clarify the connection of the masonry wall along gridline G.4 to the slab or concrete beam below as occurs. Reference IBC 106.1

Sheet S104
Detail 3/S801 cut at gridlines G.4/3.6 does not appear to accommodate differing beam depths where the bottom flanges are not aligned. Please clarify or revise the detail to account for all framing conditions. Reference IBC 106.1

Sheet S501
Detail 4 and Detail 7/S503: Please clarify the embedment depth of the grouted rebar into the existing wall. Reference IBC 106.1

Sheet S502
This detail appears to be missing information. Please review the detail and revise accordingly. Reference IBC 106.1

Sheet S601
Detail 2: Please clarify, in elevation B, if the top and bottom bars of the supported beam are to be hooked where the beam terminates at the supporting beam. Reference IBC 106.1

Detail 6: This detail applies to that condition in which the slab depression falls on the edge of the beam; however, there appear to be multiple locations where the slab depression falls within the beam edges such as along gridline F.5 between X.2 and X.4. Please revise accordingly. Reference IBC 106.1

Structural Calculations
Footing Designs F7 through CF6: It appears that the load derivations and applied combinations used in the design of these footings have not been included with the calculation package. Please clarify the loads to these footings and verify that all shear wall footings have accounted for those load combinations in which wind and seismic effects are included. Reference IBC 1604.4

Shear Wall Designs: Many of the included shear wall design outputs by ETABS indicate controlling load combinations that do not include lateral loading and, in some cases, wind appears to control. For example, SW1 indicates combination LC3A for the flexural reinforcement and SW2 indicates LC2, neither of which contain lateral loads. Please clarify the shearwall design outputs where the load combinations are indicated and verify that the lateral loads have been considered for the shearwall reinforcement. Reference IBC 1604.4

ENERGY CODE COMMENTS:
See city comments for submittal requirements of building envelope analysis.

Plans to reflect requirements of an approved building envelope compliance certificate

ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS:
See Architectural comments



Sincerely,

WILLDAN




Chris Kiel, C.B.O., M.C.P.
Building Official

CK/jk
06/20/2007 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Needs Review 1:ALOFT TUCSON
2:NEEDS WASTEWATER 8TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION-YVONNE @740-6500
3:NEEDS WASTEWATER/IWC REVIEW (GREASE INTERCEPTOR/GARAGE DRAINS, ETC) TOM TOMCHAK @ 579-5771
4:NEEDS WASTEWATER DESIGN REVIEW OF EJECTOR SYSTEMS- TERRY CURLEY 740-8207
06/21/2007 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Needs Review
06/25/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied An approved site plan by all reviewing sections is required prior to building plan approval.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/19/2007 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/24/2007 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed