Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T07CM02015
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Per C.O.T. amendments to the 2003 IFC (Section 508), an additional on site fire hydrant is required. Fire sprinklers may be considered as an option. |
| 05/25/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Designing the site plumbing constitutes the practice of engineering. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2003. 3. Show the location and size of the public sanitary sewer. Reference City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0 and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 4. Tucson Water limits the application of 5/8" water meters to demands of 10 gpm or less. Increase the size of the water meters accordingly. 5. Provide the listing information for the proposed 2-way cleanouts. Reference Sections 311.7, 707.4, and 707.6, UPC 2003. 6. Show the inverts of the building sewer on the drawing. The slope of the building sewer shall be at least ¼" per foot unless it is shown to be impractical due to the depth of the public sewer or structural conditions. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 718.1, UPC 2003. |
| 05/25/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T07CM02015 240 E. Grant Rd. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL: 06/01/07 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.2 The legal description provided is not correct. Provide corrected legal. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.7 Provide the setback dimension from the future curb to the building at the closest point from building to curb. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.8 The access aisle for both of the indicated handicap parking spaces must meet ANSI 117.1-2003 Sec. 502.4.2 and 502.4.3. The access aisle must be the full width for the entire length of the parking spaces they serve. The indicated curb cannot block the end of the access aisle. On detail 4 of D-1 clearly indicate the maximum slope of the parking space and access aisle. Per ANSI 117.1-2003 Sec. 502.5 the maximum slope is 1:48. On detail 4 of D-1 is a note indicating the at the pedestrian circulation handicap accessibility will have a minimum slope of 1:10. The correct maximum slope is 1:12 per ANSI 117.1-2003 Sec. 405.2. Revise note. Per City of Tucson Standards the minimum distance from grade to the bottom the main handicap sign is seven (7) feet. Revise detail 3 of D-1. In the parking calculations for the future right of way taking clearly indicate the number of required and provided parking spaces. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Detail 11 of D-1indicates class two bicycle parking parallel to a wall, on the site plan the spaces are perpendicular to the wall. Clearly indicate the required 36" space from the rack to the wall at the front of the rack. FYI: the indicated 10" from the bicycle to the wall is incorrect, minimum distance is 30" from the rack to a wall parallel to the rack. See DS 2-09 figure 9. FYI: When less than 50 vehicle parking spaces are provided it is allowed to substitute class two bicycle parking spaces for the required class one spaces. See LUC 3.3.7.8.A The location of the class two bicycle parking spaces must be within 50' of the main building entrance(s). Provide for both buildings. See DS 2-09.4.1. Directional signage must be provided if the class two bicycle parking spaces are not visible from the adjacent street. See DS 2-09.4.4 5. DS 2-02.2.1.11 Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 a minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and a wall or screen. This will be required along the entire east property line. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.13 If applicable, provide location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage including any billboards. 7. DS 2-02.2.1.25 If applicable, provide existing and proposed lighting layout and type. 8. DS 2-02.2.2.A.3 In the zoning information portion of the site plan is a note stating "located on nonresidential zones (30)" , remove this note. The indicated required Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is incorrect. The correct FAR for this project is 0.90. Provide the proposed FAR in the zoning information portion of the site plan. There is a set of notes located to the left of the parking calculations, floor area required, building, site, and X, these are incorrect or not required because of duplication. Remove notes. The bicycle parking calculations provided in the parking calculation portion of the site plan indicate that all bicycle parking spaces are to be class two. The plans and details indicate that class one bicycle parking spaces are being provided. Clarify. In the bicycle parking calculations it is indicated that 41 vehicle parking spaces are being used for the calculation. Revise to the provided 48 spaces. 9. Depending on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments, additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 |
| 06/01/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
| 06/08/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 9, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM02015 PROJECT NAME: Konner Plaza Retail Stores PROJECT ADDRESS: 240 East Grant Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Provide a north arrow with the scale. DS 2-02.2.1.A.1. 2. Provide the minimum 2' setback between the PAAL and the chain link fence. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11., DS 3-05.2.2.B.3. 3. Provide the general direction of drainage throughout the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 4. Provide the finished floor elevation of the structures. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 5. Provide finish grades throughout the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 6. Provide the estimated cut and fill quantities, if the quantities are zero indicate on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 7. Clearly indicate the future curb location by dimensioning from the street centerline of Grant Road to the face of future curb. Remove keynote 2, it appears the curb is being proposed on this plan. Label the dimension future curb and provide the length. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19. 8. Show the location of the drainage easement depicted in keynote 16. In the response letter indicate the general location of the easement. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20. 9. Indicate on the plan view if Grant Road has sidewalks. If Grant Road does not have existing sidewalk, this project must provide new 6' sidewalks. Revise and label accordingly. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 10. Provide existing contours and/or spot elevations with the Bench Mark and datum. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. 11. Indicate within the solid waste enclosure detail an inside clear dimension of 10'. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32. |
| 06/11/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide North arrow on landscape plan. 2. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4. Existing landscape must meet minimum requirements 3. Planting Plan. The planting plan and layout calculations will include the following information: § Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material. § Locations, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place. § Identify screening elements. 4. An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City. 5. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1. Additional tree is required within vehicle use area. 6. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. Graphically show irrigation on landscape plan. 7. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 8. Additional comments may apply. |
| 06/12/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Under review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/13/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/13/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |