Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T07CM01961
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: ABC Insurance T07CM01961 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 08, 2007 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\grading\t07cm01961.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/17/2007 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. ALL NOTES FOR ALL PLANS AND DETAILS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1/8" IN HEIGHT FOR ALL DRAWINGS. 2. CONCRETE PATIO ACCESS TO FRONT DOOR IS LESS THAN 1:20 SLOPE AND IS NOT CONSIDERED A RAMP. THEREFORE, IT DOES NOT REQUIRE A DETECTABLE WARNING TEXTURE. HOWEVER, THE ELEVATION TRANSITION TO THE ENTRANCE DOOR SILL MUST BE A SMOOTH, 180 DEGREE CHANGE. |
| 10/19/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Second request. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. 2. Second request. Provide plumbing plans for the new work, including water isometrics. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 3. Second request. Coordinate the plumbing plans and riser diagrams (e.g. show the existing service sink on the waste & vent diagram). Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 4. Second request. Show the size of the trap and trap arm for the existing service sink. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 5. Second request, provide a cut sheet for the specified water closet. Show that the relocated water closet complies with Section 409.0, UPC 2003. 6. Second request. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2003. |
| 10/19/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/29/2007 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | If 25% of the AC #1, to account for the largest motor on that service and feeder, is added to the panel total, it would be overloaded. |
| 11/01/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEEDS 8TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/14/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/14/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |