Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07CM01774
Parcel: 11108178A

Address:
2460 N DODGE BL

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T07CM01774
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/30/2007 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
05/15/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: May 20, 2007
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM01774
PROJECT NAME: Community Behavioral Health
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2460 North Dodge Blvd.
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate

The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT

SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

1. Site plan will not be approved until Lot Combination recordation is complete with Pima County. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2. See Zoning's Comment No. 2.

2. It is acknowledged that this project could be a full code compliance review. That said if it is determined the project will undergo a full code compliance review, the site plan must meet the standards found in DS 2-02 Site Plan Content and Specifications.

3. Once the Lot Combination is complete be sure to provide the new lot dimension and bearings on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5.

4. It appears keynote 29 is not being used. The keynote calls out sight visibility triangles (SVT) however on the plan view the keynote is not shown. The lengths of the SVTs are also not shown. Provide the through side length and utilized the keynote or remove the keynote from the plan.

5. Provide an accessible ramp with detectable warnings (truncated domes) where the sidewalks are flush with the asphalt between the two landscape islands and handi cap parking spaces. See Zoning's Redlines. Also provide accessible ramps with detectable warnings (truncated domes) where pedestrian circulation meets the asphalt. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13, DS 2-02.2.1.A.12.

6. Provide on the plan in a general note the estimated cut and fill quantities. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17.

7. It is probable that a grading permit and plan will be required. If this is the case it is recommended to submit for a grading view with the second submittal of the site plan.

8. Provide the recordation data (docket and page) for Dodge Blvd. and indicate Dodge Blvd. is a public street. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18.

9. Dodge Blvd. is not designated an arterial or collector road per the MS&R Plan. The notation/call out for the future curb is misleading. Is the notation to indicate Dodge Blvd has no curbs and a ROW plan indicates new curb in that location? Please clarify in detail in the response letter and clarify if Dodge Blvd. currently has no curb.

10. Provide a dimension from centerline to the existing sidewalk location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21.

11. All new development must provide continuous pedestrian circulation. Provide pedestrian circulation with a 4' sidewalk from Dodge Blvd. to the parking area to the existing structures. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12.

12. Show all easements of record graphically on the plan with the docket and page. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20.

13. Provide the datum used for the shown contours. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23.

14. Please be aware that if this project will be reviewed for full code compliance the solid waste must be shown and must reflect current standards. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32.

15. Provide a detail of both retention systems. At minimum provide the top and bottom elevation, water surface elevation and the size and type of inflow structure(s) to be employed with the proposed retention systems. Include dimensions and elevations of critical portions of those structures. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A.4.a.

16. A light pole is located in the retention basin. How will this effect the integrity of the structure? Provide discussion to support this location, or relocate the light pole.

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS

1. Provide the address of the project on the drainage report. Retention/Detention Manual 5.2

2. Provide the submittal number on the drainage report. Retention/Detention Manual 5.2

3. All commercial developments larger then 1 acre in size must provide 5-year threshold retention; the volumetric difference between the developed and the existing 5 year peak discharge. It is acknowledged the report provided discussion on the 10, 25 and 100 year event, however 5 year threshold retention must be addressed in the report. Provide discussion and appropriate calculations for 5 year threshold retention. Retention/Detention Manual 1.4, 3.2

4. The hydrologic data sheet for concentration point 1, shows the percentage of impervious surface is only 5%. This office acknowledges the watershed area is to be undeveloped. However it is highly recommended to change the percent of impervious surface for future development. Is future development proposed for this project? Provide a detailed response and consider the recommendation.

5. It is not clear how the water will enter the large water harvesting area. Provide discussion.

6. Provide a detail of both retention systems. Provide the top and bottom elevation, water surface elevation and the size and type of inflow structure(s) to be employed with the proposed retention basin. Include dimensions and elevations of critical portions of those structures. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A.4.a.

7. A light pole is located in the retention basin. How will this effect the integrity of the structure? Provide discussion to support this location, or relocate the light pole.

8. Provide a more detail inspection and maintenance discussion in the drainage report. Review attached document with project paperwork for an example.

9. A soils report is required in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility that utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. Percolation test must show a maximum disposal time of 12 hours. At minimum, provide a soil's report that addresses the required disposal time for a storage facility that utilizes infiltration as a method of drainage. SDRM 3.5.1.5. and SMDDFM 14.2.6.
05/18/2007 HEATHER THRALL ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied Please see the zoning review comments for this project.
05/18/2007 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall
Senior Planner

PROJECT: T07CM01774
2460 N. Dodge Blvd. - new parking lot on lot added to site for Community
Behavioral Health Properties at 2502 N. Dodge Blvd.
Commercial Site plan, 1st review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 16, 2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project was reviewed for full code compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), International Building Code (IBC 2003) and American National Standard Institute. Specifically, this project was reviewed for site plan content of DS 2-02.

This project was NOT reviewed for full code compliance, just for the parking lot and storage room use on the subject lot. Please note, percentage of expansion calculations are required for both the storage building in relation to the existing square footage of building area for the care facility, and for the lot area being added versus the existing lot area. Note that if the expansion is over 25% for either calculation, full code compliance would be required and further extensive review comments may follow.

Please provide a master drawing for the overall site, dimensioned with parking and buildings - and provide note indicating to see the current sheet SP-1 as the sheet for the subject development with development details.

2. Per discussion with the applicant April 27, 2007, this project may only proceed if the site the proposed parking lot is on is combined with 2502 N. Dodge, the existing behavioral health care facility, as the 0-3 zone does not allow a parking lot use on an independent lot. See the lot combination and lot combination covenant form attached for the owner to proceed with recording. Please return a copy of the recordation receipt on the next review. Please include parcel 313C in this combination - and clarify if any cross parking access for the apartments is provided.

3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.2, provide exact legal for subject lot.

4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.5, show the lot line between the north boundary of subject site and south boundary of care facility in a dashed manner with notation that combination will be done.

5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.6, with regards to the existing building on the subject lot:
A) clarify the use of the existing building addressed 3751 E. Grant.
B) Provide setback from posts of porch to east lot line
C) Provide vertical clearance of porch to ground
D) Provide distance between building wall and post of porch
E) Provide height of building
F) Clarify any overhangs
G) Provide building dimensions and square footage

6. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7., with regards to the parking:
A) wheel stops shall be contained entirely within the top 2'6" of the top of the parking space, please modify the detail drawing. Per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2
B) provide an overall parking calculation for the entire site on the resubmittal.

7. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, note that bicycle parking calculations and details for the overall site would be needed if it is determined that this project must be re-reviewed for full code compliance due to the lot or s.f. expansion.

7. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12, with regards to pedestrian and handicapped access;
A) a pedestrian path from street to buildings must be provided; if on existing behavioral development site to north-clearly call out. If no sidewalk is provided from Dodge to existing behavioral development site, provide sidewalk connection from Dodge through new parking lot area to connect to existing behavioral development site.
B) Provide a sidewalk from existing buildings to north to the building on the parking lot site - connect to entrance.
C) Provide crosswalk connection across PAAL at north part of new parking lot area
D) Clarify if concrete in flush at ends where crosswalk will be installed, if not in flush, provide ramp
E) Provide truncated domes at all points where pedestrian connection meets vehicular use area. See my notes on plan.
F) Provide truncated domes on sidewalk where transitioning to handicapped access aisle.
G) Vertical curb is required to separate the sidewalk from the PAAL - please check east side of PAAL area that leads into the northern developed site
H) The new sidewalk leading to the entrance of the building to the north is interrupted by a post at the entry from what I can see. Please check and ensure the sidewalk will not be impeded.

9. Per DS 2-02.2.1.13 - please call out any new signage.

10. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20 - with regards to easements
A) please ensure all easements on the property are shown with recordation info on the plan.
B) The easement to the south, labeled as 28 on the plan, is not wide enough for commercial access, which this parcel is now required to have with a commercial use. In addition, vehicular access is not permitted to occur to undeveloped portions of the site. The access easement should be abandoned and a 1' no vehicular access easement should be recorded across the former point of access. Please provide recordation data on the resubmittal.

11. Per DS 2-02.1.25, show light poles vertical clearance of 15' minimum.

12. Per DS 2-02.2.1.38, please list the LDO for the site to the north (see site plans I copied for you with the reference).

13. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.1, please provide the gross and net lot areas for the overall site with the lot combination.

14. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.2, please provide the Floor Area Ratio for the existing building on the subject site vs. the subject lot size and in relation to the overall site - then provide a revised FAR for the whole site inclusive of the small building on the subject parking site.

15. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.3, provide a percentage of expansion calculation for the new lot area being added to the 2502 N. Dodge site. Provide a percentage of expansion for the storage building on the subject site in relation to the 2502 site buildings. NOTE, if either percentage of expansion calculation is greater than 25%, full code compliance for the entire site is required and further review comments will be forthcoming.

16. Further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. Please contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4951 if you have any questions on this review.


HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T07CM01774 2460 N Dodge parking lot.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
05/18/2007 HTHRALL1 ADA REVIEW Passed
05/21/2007 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).
Revise the landscape plan so that the parking spaces along the south side of the parking lot are within 40 feet from the trunk of a canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3.A

2) Revise the 5-foot vegetative screen just to the south of the entrance drive to be located entirely outside the sight visibility triangle . DS 3-01.5.1.A
05/23/2007 PETER MCLAUGHLIN NPPO REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the names listed under the "Botanic Name" heading for the two Blue Palo Verdes to read "Parkinsonia floridums".

2) Show the proposed location for the velvet mesquite to be transplanted on site.
05/23/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. the location and size of the water meter
b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants
c. the location and size of the sanitary sewer and
d. the location, invert, and rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts.
Reference City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0 and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/25/2007 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
05/25/2007 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed