Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T07CM01666
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/06/2007 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 07/12/2007 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | ELECTRICAL COMMENTS. THE RESUBMITTAL ON ELECTRICAL REMAINS INCOMPLETE. THE SERVICE RISER DIAGRAM INDICATES A SERVICE WHICH DOES NOT STATE ITS SIZE OR AMPACITY, FEEDING A GUTTER WHICH IN TURN FEEDS TWO ONE 100 AMP DISCONNECTS, ONE DISCONNECT FEEDS A PANEL WHICH APPEARS TO BE LOADED TO 124 AMPS. THE OTHER DISCONNECT DOES NOT SHOW WHAT IT FEEDS, COULD IT FEED THE OTHER TWO EXISTING PANELS, IF SO WHAT ARE THERE TOTAL AMPERAGE LOADS ? I AM WANTING TO SEE TOTAL LOAD ON THE SERVICE. PLEASE SHOW THIS. |
| 07/16/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Mountain Coffee Roasters T07CM01666 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 16, 2007 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\grading\t07cm01666.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 07/26/2007 | LEERAY HANLY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify location of building and setbacks from property line. (previous correction note 2) 2. Show all adjacent buildings and justify construction per tables 602 and 704.8 of the 2003 IBC (previous correction note 2) |
| 08/02/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Keynote 7.2 (sheet A-3) calls out a new gas-fired water heater for this project but an electric water heater is specified on sheets P-1 and E-1. Please coordinate the project. 2. Provide material standards for all plumbing fixtures being provided by others. Reference Section 401.1, UPC 2003. 3. The maximum flow rates for plumbing fixtures shall be consistent with ARS Title 45, Chapter 1, Article 12. See text at: (http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp). Reference Section 402.1, UPC 2003, as amended by the State of Arizona. 4. If the specified water heater is not supplied with integral heat traps, provide 0.5" of insulation with a maximum conductivity of 0.27 btu per inch/h °F on the first 8 feet of supply and discharge piping. Reference Section 804.5, IECC 2003. 5. Revise the provided water pressure calculations to include the pressure drop due to the reduced pressure backflow preventer and justify the use of a minimum pressure requirement of 8 PSI. Reference Sections 402.6, 608.1, and 610.1, UPC 2003. 6. Calculate the water demand using the fixture units shown in Tables 6-4 or A-2. Reference Section 610.3, UPC 2003. 7. Provide the listing for the two-way cleanout fitting called out on the plumbing plan, sheet P-1. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 707.6, UPC 2003. 8. Provide a schedule of waste fixture units for all plumbing fixtures using the values shown in table 7-3, UPC 2003. Reference Section 703.1, UPC 2003. 9. Revise the size of the cleanout shown for P-06 per Section 707.11, UPC 2003. 10. Revise the size of the vents per Section 904.1, UPC 2003. 11. Tucson Water does not include ¾" water meters in their inventory; only 5/8" and 1" are available for your demand range. |
| 08/02/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly on the drawings, specify the reduced pressure backflow assembly being installed, and indicate the size of the assembly. Reference COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf |
| 08/02/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2003 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments is the relevant code for this project (not the UMC). 2. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference Section 803.2.8, IECC 2003. 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference Section 803.2.1, IECC 2003. 4. Show how the fan coil unit is to be supported from the structure. Reference Section 302.1, IMC 2003. 5. The location of the access panel appears to be blocked by the ductwork. Provide maintenance access and lighting for the fan coil unit in accordance with Sections 306.1 and 306.3, IMC 2003. 6. Show that the termination of the condensate drain will not result in surface flow of the condensate. Reference Section 307.2, IMC 2003 and Section 807.2, UPC 2003. 7. Provide auxiliary drain pans or secondary drain systems for the fan coil unit. Reference Section 307.2.3 IMC 2003. 8. Correct the provided ventilation calculations per Section 403.3 and 403.3.2, IMC 2003. Reference Section 401.2, IMC 2003. 9. Provide information to show how the ductwork has been sized (i.e. provide calculations). Reference Section 603.2, IMC 2003. |
| 08/03/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. TUCSON MOUNTAIN COFFEE ROASTERS 2. CONNECTION TO EXISTING ON SITE PRIVATE SEWER 3. NEEDS WASTEWATER 8TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION - 740-6500 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/09/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/09/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |