Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T07CM01642
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/2007 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/08/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: T07CM01642, 1538 W. Prince Road New Parking Garage Commercial Site plan - 1st review TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 22, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), The Development Standards (DS), American National Standard Institute (ANSI) and the International Building Code 2003 (IBC). This project was reviewed for compliance with the site plan standards of DS 2-02. 2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.2, revise the legal description in the title block to show the Section as 27, rather than 13. 3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.6, with regards to the building: A) dimension footprint B) clarify how height is measured - from grade to top of wall, flat roof, parapet, pitch? C) Show any overhangs with a dashed line D) Vertical clearance is required at 15' minimum for all vehicular use areas with PAAL access per DS 3-05.2.1.C.4.a - the building must be redesigned to be taller to meet this standard. 4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7, with regards to setbacks A) the correct Development Designator for this project is "31", please revise, listing the required building setbacks as 0 against surrounding C-2 zoned sites - then provide actual building setbacks (for records and inspections). 5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, with regards to parking: A) Please provide a parking layout within the building - and outside the building if applicable. All parking must meet the design guidelines of DS 3-05 and LUC 3.3.4. Show the spaces, wheel stops, dimensioned and all PAAL widths for maneuvering. 6. Per DS 2-02.2.1.10, please show sight visibility triangles on the site plan (I see them on the civil grading plan). 7. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, please show all points of ingress/egress and PAALs dimensioned. 8. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, and DS 3-05 2.2.B.3, provide a two foot separation between the PAAL and the west property line. 8. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12, with regards to handicapped, pedestrian and vehicular circulation: A) provide curbing to separate the PAAL use areas from landscaped and unimproved areas. B) Provide arrows at west PAAL and throughout parking garage to show traffic circulation C) Provide sidewalk physically separated (raised or with curbing) between the building and the PAAL at the west side D) Provide pedestrian floor plan of garage to show any pedestrian or handicapped access through the structure E) Point out any handicapped ramps with slope and truncated domes F) Clarify if any handicapped parking will be provided with access aisles in the garage 9. Per DS 2-02.1.13, please clarify if there will be any free-standing signage with specs. 10. Per DS 2-02.2.1.19, Prince Road is listed as having a future right of way maximum of 120'. Please show the future right of way and the future curb on the site plan. Note that if the site will be altered significantly by the taking of the future right of way, a future site plan is required to be included with the current site plan drawing. 11. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20, please show any easements with recordation data. 12. Per DS 2-02.2.1.25, please show any proposed free-standing lighting with vertical clearances of 15' minimum noted. 13. Per DS 2-02.2.1.31, list the existing use and clarify that demolition will occur. 14. Per DS 2-02.2.1.32, please see Engineering for waste pick up requirements. 15. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.2. Per 3.2.11, a parking garage does not have a Floor Area Ratio - however - any area of the building that is not a parking garage use will count towards a Floor Area Ratio calculation. Staff noted that note 10 expresses that there will be wastewater fixtures. Please explain this note and provide a floor plan of the garage - labeling any offices, etc. 16. Please note, staff feels this project may have a different intention than a parking garage - perhaps commercial storage. Please note that if a different use is proposed, a new review will be done to the development designator requirements for that use. 17. Please note that depending upon the responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T07CM01642 1538 w prince.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 05/11/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception determined |
| 05/11/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten (10) foot requirement, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the fifty (50) percent vegetative coverage requirement, Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line. Revise landscape plan to incorporate Detention/retention facilities into the street landscape borders. 2. Plants located in the bottom one-third (1/3) of the detention/retention basin must be adaptable to periods of submersion. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. 3. Revise square footage of street landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 4. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Provide screen for entire street frontage. 5. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 6. Additional comments may apply. |
| 05/16/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2298.31') is higher than the first floor elevation (2286.33', assuming the FFE of 2386.33' shown on the plans is a typographical error) Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2003. |
| 05/23/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 24, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM01642 PROJECT NAME: Parking Project PROJECT ADDRESS: 1538 East Prince Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT 1. Provide future near and far side sight visibility triangles (SVT). If the existing and future ROW are coincident, label the SVT, "existing and future." DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. 2. Dimension the backup spurs in the PAAL area. See Zoning comment number 7 and redlines. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11. 3. Dimension the space between the west property line and the PAAL. A two foot separation is required. DS 3-05.2.2.B. 4. Provide a sidewalk that is physically separated between the structure and the PAAL. DS 2-08.4.1. 5. Provide a vertical barrier between the PAAL and the unimproved landscape area. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1. 6. Provide cut and fill quantities in cubic yards on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 7. Prince Road is an arterial road that has a future ROW width of 120'. Dimension from the centerline of Prince Road the future ½ ROW width, future curb and sidewalk location. A 9' sidewalk area is for a future ROW width of 120'. Revise the plan to show the future ROW designation, label appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19. 8. When the future ROW is taken the site will be significantly changed. That said a future ROW plan is required to show how the site will function and meet minimum requirements. One area of concern is the basins. The requirements for a development within a critical basin must still be met. Provide the future ROW plan and a revise drainage report showing the future locations of the basins. 9. Indicate the width of the existing sidewalk within the ROW. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 10. If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan with docket and page. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20. 11. The datum provided on the plan is NAVD 1988. When comparing the contours on the plan to the Department of Transportation's Map Site, the elevations of the contours are significantly different. Please verify the accuracy of the contours and revise appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. 12. Provide an on site solid waste container and if required enclosure. Provide a detail of the enclosure. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32. 13. The Finish Floor Elevations of basin 1 and 2 are different in details provided on sheet 3. Revise the details to match. 14. Call out the 7' chain link fence on the west side of the property. DS 2-02.2.1.A.22. 15. Provide the required 25' curb returns for the entrance/exit drive from Prince Road. Transportation Access Management Guidelines. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. The drainage report is acceptable. However due to the fact Prince Road will be subject to a future ROW taking the basins will have to be relocated in the future when the ROW is developed to the future conditions. Revise the drainage report to provide a drainage solution for future comments. |
| 05/23/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Please see zoning review comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/05/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |