Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T07CM01436
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/06/2007 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | No Parking - Fire Lane signs required on ingress/egress road |
| 04/10/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: A-Atlas Discount Storage - Broadway @ Stoner T07CM01436 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 12, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D. Remove the references to the subdivisions and show the Este and Hidden Hills wash on the location map. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide heights for all buildings so that setbacks can be verified. Depending on how this comment is addressed, additional comments maybe forth coming. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Based on a perimeter yard indicator of "BB" and LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 Perimeter Yard Width Matrix, the required setback to a C1 zone is (H) or the height of the proposed building wall, measured from design grade. It does not appear that Buildings 2, 3 & 14 meet the required setback. Until building heights are provided zoning is unable to verify these setbacks. A Design Development Option (DDO) may be required. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Based on a perimeter yard indicator of "BB" and LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 Perimeter Yard Width Matrix, the required setback to the R1 zone is 10' or ¾ the height of the proposed building wall, which ever is greatest, measured from design grade. Until the heights of the buildings are provided and the setback zoning cannot verify that the required setback to the R1 zone is met. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B, Table 3.2.6.I and an ADT of 1,000 or greater the required setback to Stoner Avenue is 21' measured from the back of existing/future curb. Zoning acknowledges that Building 15 appears to meet this setback, provide a dimension from the curb to the building. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Show the wheel stops on the handicapped parking space detail along with a dimension as shown in D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 and D.S. 3-05 Figure 5. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The handicapped sign detail, does not meet the minimum requirements, see attached. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 The detail called out for the bicycle parking on sheet 2 of 4, Detail "D", does not match what is called out on sheet 4 of 4 "J". Detail "J" sheet 4 of 4, bicycle detail does not meet the layout requirements of D.S. 2-09.5.0 and Figure 9. Also provide all required information listed in D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9. 10. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 The proposed sidewalk which runs parallel to the entrance parking area access lane (PAAL) appears to end at the proposed handicapped vehicle parking space. It is unclear how this sidewalk provides the pedestrian circulation/accessible route from Broadway Blvd. to the proposed office building, D.S. 2-08.3.0 & D.S. 2-08.4.1.A. Demonstrate how this sidewalk provides the required pedestrian circulation/accessible route. 11. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13, show on the plan. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 Zoning acknowledges the location of the proposed monument sign for this project. Provide the size and height of proposed sign. This proposed sign is located within the future SVT as currently shown on the plan. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 13. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.19 Zoning acknowledges that the current right-of-way (ROW) for Broadway Blvd. is 150'. There are currently improvements in progress for this area of Broadway, ensure that these improvements are reflected on this plan. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 There is a "10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY JOINT USE AGREEMENT" called out on the plan. Per Development Plan D06-0053 this easement is called out as a drainage easement but not shared. Provide documentation that supports the shared drainage easement. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 Provide the zoning for the parcel to the west. 17. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.31 The "PROPOSED USE" should be listed as "PERSONAL STORAGE '38', SUBJECT TO SEC. 3.5.10.3. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Lot coverage is not applicable to this site plan, remove all references from this plan. 19. Clearly indicate on the plan the extent of perimeter wall/fence on the plan. Addition comments maybe forth coming. 20. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 21. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t07cm01436.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 04/12/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
| 04/18/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the native plant preservation plan to include all proposed off site improvements, such as the ingress/egress easement and bank protection. 2) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading (include off site areas). DS 2-15.3.4.A 3) The proposed 30' ingress/egress easement conflicts with the plans approved for case number D06-0053. The proposed access drive is located where the approved NPP plans show preserved-in-place protected native plants. 4) Floodplain comments. A) All open channels shall include an appropriate degree of visual-impact mitigation, such as landscaping, adding color and texture to bank-protection materials according to the C.O.T. Drainage Design Manual. Revise the plans to provide the required visual impact mitigation. DDM Introduction (Chapter VIII). B) The proposed bank protection in the floodplain constitutes development in a Regulated Area per DS 2-13.2.2.B.2. The wash is identified as "TSMS-WASH(Under Review)". C) Encroachments in regulated areas require submittal of an Environmental Resource Report. Provide a table of contents and all pertinent information. The Table of Contents is to include all items listed in DS 2-13.2.5.B. If items are available in another document provide a specific reference, if a waiver to specific item is desired request it, if an item is not applicable explain why. 5) Refer to the Sign Code regarding the proposed off-site sign. |
| 04/30/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the native plant preservation plan to include all proposed off site improvements, such as the ingress/egress easement and bank protection. Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading (include off site areas). DS 2-15.3.4.A The proposed 30' ingress/egress easement conflicts with the plans approved for case number D06-0053. The proposed access drive is located where the approved NPP plans show preserved-in-place protected native plants. |
| 05/01/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/12/2007 | CAGUILA1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/12/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |