Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T07CM01386
Parcel: 14041129A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T07CM01386
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/05/2007 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
04/12/2007 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall
Senior Planner

PROJECT: T07CM01386
7000 S. Palo Verde Road, Industrial Park for Offices and Industrial Uses
Commercial Site plan, 1st review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 04/18/2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project was reviewed in compliance with requirements of the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS), American National Standard Institute (ANSI) and International Building Code 2003 (IBC). This project was reviewed for compliance with the site plan criteria outlined in DS 2-02 and per the I-1 zoning regulations of the LUC, Section 2.7.2. - including general restrictions and subject to sections applicable to certain uses proposed.

2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.2, the legal description and lot history for the property indicates lot split processes have occurred to create this parcel as currently configured. Please provide documentation that the city has reviewed and approved the present lot configuration. Please note that further review comments may be forthcoming on this issue.

3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.4, on the location map - please add Elvira & Valencia Roads.

4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.5, please clarify the lot line locations on sheet 2, and show the lot dimensions and bearings on sheets 1-3 please.

5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.6, with regards to buildings:
A) show any roof overhangs with a dashed line/dimension, provide vertical clearance
B) clarify roof style - parapet or ridge?
C) Clarify where roof height is measured from - top of roof, parapet?
D) Provide heights for both parapet, flat roof or top of ridge and ridge midpoint
E) Clarify whether there are second floors on these buildings, or any mezzanines
F) Provide floor plans and elevations when available
G) Clarify that due to subject to sections and annexation restrictions that only certain industrial uses are permitted - general manufacturing, craftwork, precision manufacturing and processing.
H) Please show doors/entries
I) Please show any garage door entries with widths

6. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7, with regards to setbacks:
A) Per the Major Streets and Routes Map of the COT, Palo Verde and Corona Roads are not Major Streets and Routes. The setback from both Palo Verde and Corona Roads are "the greater of 21' or the height of the exterior building wall from the travel lane". Please list this on the plan.

7. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, re:parking:
A) please consider moving the HC parking near building one to be more centered along the full length of the building.
B) Please dimension all back up spurs per DS 3-05 criteria/depth
C) Please clarify what's going on with the "striped parking spaces" next to the back up spurs?
D) Please note that per ANSI Chapter 4, angled handicapped accessible parking spaces can only have access aisles on the passenger side of the space. Please revise the handicapped parking area at the far west side of the site.

8. Per DS 2-02.2.1.9, re: bike parking:
A) Please disperse the bicycle parking more evenly across the length of each building
B) Please clarify whether keynote 11 covers both class 1 and class 2 bike parking
C) Please clarify what type of bike post is provided - elevation view please - and note that DS 2-09 has recently changed to revise types of allowed bike posts
D) Please clarify how many bikes are held in each class 1 and class 2 container
E) Please clarify the entrances on the building, demonstrating class 2 bike racks are within 50' of entrances
F) Clarify surfacing leading up to bike racks
G) It appears the bike parking near building 2 is impeding the sidewalk, please move

9. Per DS 2-02.2.1.10, please show sight visibility triangles.

10. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, please dimension all PAALs/entries - clarify if large concrete circle at SW corner of site is an open, level PAAL circle or if there is a raised concrete island in it.

11. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12, regarding handicapped/pedestrian access:
A) it appears that the bike parking is impeding the sidewalk near building 2
B) please provide a sidewalk and cross walk to building 1 from Palo Verde
C) please clarify if the area leading behind the buildings to the loading zones is public
D) if not public, please provide note and provide 5' wide striped pedestrian refuge along full length of each building up to loading zones
E) clarify what the area is just south of the large loading dock at the NW side of site and show pedestrian connection situation here

12. Per DS 2-02.2.1.13, advise of any free-standing signage with heights, specs.

13. Per DS 2-02.2.1.14, regarding loading zones:
A) please demonstrate how maneuvering will work for the loading zone between buildings 1 and 2.

14. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20, please ensure all easements are on the plan, with recordation data and type. Keynotes would be helpful.

15. Per DS 2-02.2.1.25, please ensure all lighting is shown on the plan with vertical clearances. Or provide a note that lighting to be provided by others if it is uncertain at this time. Note that a separate lighting plan would then be required at permitting.

16. Per DS 2-02.2.1.32, I see the refuse locations - please see engineering for further comments with regards to size and location.

17. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.2, please clarify if the FAR provided is inclusive of all buildings. Please provide a separate FAR for each building as well.

18. Per DS 2-02.2.2.B, please advise if the project as shown shall be in phases. Provide separate phasing calcs for development if applicable.

19. Please explain why the stock piles are going to be on the site, and if they are temporary. Also, where is the dirt coming from - adjacent site or from elsewhere?

20. Please note that further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608.
04/19/2007 HEATHER THRALL ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied Please see zoning review comments.
04/19/2007 HTHRALL1 ADA REVIEW Passed
04/25/2007 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Include inside dimensions of strip planter within vehicle use area on the landscape, site and grading plans. A minimum of 4' in width must be provided for each canopy tree. The measurement is always within the planter area and does not include any material which defines the outer edge of the unpaved area per DS 2-06.3.3.C.

2. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Identify plant material used for screening element.

3. Show required sight visibility triangles on the landscape and site plan per LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06.

4. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation.

5. All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting.

6. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape & grading plan.

7. Show the total number PIP, TOS, required mitigation for each species on the Native Plant Summary included on Sheet NP-1 per DS 2-15.3.4.B.

8. Additional comments may apply.
04/26/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Show the total number PIP, TOS, required mitigation for each species on the Native Plant Summary included on Sheet NP-1 per DS 2-15.3.4.B.
04/30/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is higher than the first floor elevation for buildings 1 and 2. Provide backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2003.
2. The presence of manholes in a private sewer collection system will require review of the sewer design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Submit the design to PDEQ at 150 W Congress St, 1st Floor (740-3340).
06/07/2007 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: June 11, 2007
SUBJECT: 7000 S Palo Verde Road Site Plan- Engineering Review
TO: Rick Engineering Company
LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec16, Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T07CM01386 (Site Plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T07CM01386) and Drainage Report (Rick Engineering Company, 03APR07) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan application at this time. The drainage report was reviewed for site plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the location map on Sheet 1 of 6 to provide for conditions within the square mile area shown on the project location map located on Sheet 1, such as major streets (Valencia and Elvira).

2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to show the minimum unobstructed radius of 5-feet that is required at all PAAL intersection and 18-feet where the PAALs are being used as access for fire lanes. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.1.3.b for PAAL requirements.

3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to provide dimensions for all proposed back-up spur with a minimum of 3 feet in depth, a 3-foot radius, and a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced area.

4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Provide (label and dimension) the existing and future (if applicable) sight visibility triangles (SVTs) in plan view for all PAAL access points. Refer to DS Sec3-01.5.1 for SVT procedures and criteria.

5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Label and dimension all points of egress and ingress for the subject parcel. Refer to the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for all driveway width requirements.

6) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label and show the dimensions and curve radius for the proposed "turn-about" on Sheet 2 and 3 of 6. The "turn-about" must show maneuverability for fire and refuse collection vehicles, show the minimum width required for the PAAL access, and must meet the minimum radius requirements for the inside and outside curvatures. Verify if the area is a raised island or if all areas are flush with the adjacent roadway.

7) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.12: Provide the required 5-foot wide sidewalk along the street frontage of Palo Verde Road. All new development shall provide 5-foot wide sidewalks along the entire length of street frontage. Refer to DS Sec.3-01 for all curb and sidewalk requirements. If a sidewalk already exist along the frontage of Palo Verde Road provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 5-foot sidewalk will be required.

8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required pedestrian circulation path that is required from all proposed buildings to the required pedestrian circulation path located along Palo Verde Road.

9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Provide the required maneuvering area for all loading zones that are shown on the site plan. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii.

10) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the retention/detention volumes on the site plan to match the proposed drainage report. The volume shown on the site plan is lower than the required volume within the drainage report. All basin side slopes must meet the recommendations within the required geotechnical report.

11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Provide the dimensioned right-of-way width for Corona Road. Label the existing right-of-way dimensions.

12) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all easements of record are graphically shown on the proposed site plan along with the recordation information.

13) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the site plan to show the maneuverability for all refuse containers located on the subject property.

14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Provide a detail with dimensions for refuse container, show or label gates or doors for trash enclosures. The enclosure must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between steel pipes that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 for refuse container requirements.

15) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.C: Revise the landscape plan to reflect the SVTs that are shown on the revised site plan. Provide a note on the landscape plan to state no structures and vegetation is allowed within 30" to 72" in height and will not be placed within the sight visibility triangles. Remove any proposed vegetation within the sight visibility triangle areas that obstructs sight visibility.

16) Ds Sec.10-02.14.3.3: Revise the site plan to provide for the required maintenance access ramp into the proposed basin. A minimum 15-foot wide vehicular access ramp is required into the basin, verify that the landscape plans do not interfere with the required 15-foot access ramp.

17) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the site plan to provide the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, detention/retention basins, and associated erosion protection. Provide cross-sections on the site plan for the proposed basin that shows the limits of grading and the required 2-feet setback from property line.

18) Per Division Directive and the proposed drainage report a bleeder pipe is required at the basin outlet to ensure positive drainage. Provide the location and dimensions of the bleeder pipe in the detail for the basin. All Basins must be designed to eliminate standing water and mosquito infestation. Infiltration test will be required prior to site plan approval to ensure that the Basin drains within the 12-hour requirement.

19) DS Sec.2-02.2.2.B: Clearly indicate on the site plan which portions will be constructed in phases, in conjunction with other major activities. Show Phase numbers and clearly delineate. Each phase must function independent of future phases, provide development calculations for each phase.

20) DS Sec.2-02.1.2: A base plan is required for all development projects. Stockpiles are not an exception. Stockpiling where the project disturbance area is 1 acre or larger the intent of the use of the stockpile shall be shown on a base plan and the grading permit should be pending base plan approval or in review.

21) DS Sec.11-01.2.3.A: A bond shall be posted for native seeding. If grading construction does not commence within 60 days after grubbing, the disturbed area shall be native seeded within 30 days following the expiration of the 60 day period.

a) Acceptable temporary controls during grading construction and up to the 60 +30 day period of non-activity:
- interim erosion and sediment controls as indicated by standard accepted BMP's
- spray-ons
- unestablished vegetation
- water truck for dust abatement
- daily sweeping of the streets

b) For stockpiles that expect to last longer than a couple of months, the accepted permanent erosion protection shall be in the form of:
- established revegetation
- gravel or rock

22) Per DS Sec.11-01.11.1: "The faces of cut and fill slopes shall be prepared and maintained to control against erosion. This control may consist of effective planting. The protection for the slopes shall be installed per the geotechnical recommendations and as soon as practicable and prior to calling for final approval. Where cut slopes are not subject to erosion due to the erosion-resistant character of the materials, such protection may be omitted."

23) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan, drainage report and geotechnical report.


DRAINAGE REPORT:

24) Revise the drainage report and any necessary changes to the site plan to show all curb openings with hydraulic calculations for design. Specifically Keynote #28 references a 24-foot curb opening that is not referenced in the drainage report. Verify that all curb openings that are within the drainage report show up on the revised site plan.

25) DS Sec.10-01.2.2: Provide a geotechnical report with building setbacks from the proposed interim channel and basin, infiltration rates for retention basin, and slope stability recommendations for basin/channel design, slope stability, and proposed riprap splash pad. Clarify if the drainage report and site plan match the geotechnical report.

26) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: Revise the hydraulic calculation sheets and the details for the channel slopes to meet the minimum recommendations within the required geotechnical engineering report.

27) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. Any scupper proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow.


GEOTECHNICAL REPORT:

28) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a geotechnical report evaluation that addresses the following:

a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for basin, and provide a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to proposed retention/detention basins, water harvesting basins and constructed interim channel.

b) Provide slope stability recommendations for all proposed constructed slopes.

c) Provide pavement structure design recommendations.

d) Provide percolation rates for retention/detention basins for 5-year threshold retention.


GRADING PLAN:

29) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit will be required for this project due to the cut and fill quantities provided on the site plan. Fill quantities shown exceed the 50 cubic yards so a grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after site plan approval and prior to any construction activity.

30) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the site plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf

31) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide a General Note stating that all CMU walls and retaining walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments.

32) Provide a general note on the grading plan to state the following; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html "

33) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan, drainage report, and geotechnical engineering report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan, drainage report, and geotechnical report reviews.

If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Development Services