Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07CM01155
Parcel: 11613211D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM

Permit Number - T07CM01155
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/10/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied 1) The site contains regulatory floodplain areas that may contain riparian habitat. This habitat may not unnecessarily altered per TCC Sec. 26-5.2. Refer to DS 2-13 for the preparation, submittal, and review procedures for development within areas that have environmental habitat in conformance with Article 1, Division 1, Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Area Regulations.

2) Submit an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) per DS 2-13.2.5.B.1. The report will document (1) the areas that contain riparian and wildlife habitat that is to be preserved and (2) those areas without such habitat within the regulatory floodplain.

3) All site plans, plot plans or other plans providing for approval of development within property that includes any Regulated Area as defined in Development Standard 2-13.2.2.A shall identify and delineate the Regulated Areas and the Protected Riparian Area. Verify that floodplain is correctly delineated.

4) All development within the Protected Riparian Area shall be reviewed to insure that there is no unnecessary disturbance of the riparian resources. Refer to DS 2-13.2.5.B.2 for Development Restrictions.

5) Where any development encroaches within the Protected Riparian Areas, mitigation will be required. A mitigation report shall be submitted with the Environmental Resource Report per DS 2-13.2.5.C

6) Submit a Landscape plan. A summary of mitigation and preservation requirements shall be included. The plans shall show the location of mitigation areas; methods used for mitigation of preserved natural areas, restoration and re-vegetation of disturbed areas.

7) Encroachments into Protected Riparian Area shall be located and constructed to minimize disturbance of the habitat and wildlife movement per DS 2-13.2.5.B.2

8) Any Protected Riparian Area on the property shall be protected through a conservation or public easement or other legal restriction. DS 2-13.2.6.D

9) Additional comments may apply.
04/23/2007 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
T07CM01155
1833 West Speedway Boulevard
SFR 1st review (116-13-211D)


TRANSMITTAL:


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.


1. This review is for a single family residential (SFR) in the R-1 zone (LUC Section 2.3.4.2.A.1). The Development Designator is "G" (LUC Section 3.2.3.1.B) and the Perimeter Yard Indicator is AA (LUC Section 3.2.6.4).

2. This property is located on West Speedway Boulevard, which is on the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone (LUC Section 2.8.3). Please demonstrate compliance with the MS&R requirements by providing the existing and future right-of-ways (ROWs) and the existing and future curb locations (DS 2-02.2.1.A.19).

3. This particular portion of Speedway Boulevard is also located in the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) (LUC Section 2.8.2). Please contact Patricia Gehlen concerning the Full Notice Procedure and Overlay application (Patricia.Gehlen@tucsonaz.gov or 791-5608 x 74919).

4. A thirty (30) foot landscaping buffer is required along the SCZ measured from the edge of the future ROW (LUC Section 2.8.2.4).

5. The maximum building height is twenty-four (24) feet for a residential structure in the SCZ (LUC Section 2.8.2.5.A.3) and the building setback is three (3) times the building's height (LUC Section 2.8.2.5.B).

6. All building heights must be stated on the plan (see site plan model). Do not simply refer to another sheet. Also provide fully dimensioned elevations.

7. Please be aware that there shall be additional comments relative to the Overlay procedure and submittals, changes in the plans submitted and/or additional information provided.
05/01/2007 CLAYTON TREVILLYAN BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
Activity # T07CM01155
Date: 5/02/07

Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken.

SCOPE OF REVIEW:
The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2003 International Residential Code, 2003 International Energy Conservation Code, and Arizona State amendments to the 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
All corrections and revisions shall be made on original tracings or finished reproducible set. Return this set and a copy along with a set of the first submission. Pen or pencil corrections on final prints will not be acceptable. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets.

GENERAL REQUIRMENTS:
1. Provide complete set of drawings for review
2. Missing documents:
-Foundation plan
-Wood framing plan
-Roof framing plan
-Specs
-Plumbing plan
-Mechanical plan
-Electrical plan

If you have any questions please contact:
City of Tucson Residential Plan Review
Clayton Trevillyan
(520) 837-4913
05/16/2007 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied May 17, 2007
Engineering Review for T07CM01155 and T07OT00791
1833 W Speedway

The application for a floodplain use permit cannot be approved at this time. The encroachment analysis for the project must be revised and additional hydraulic information must be provided.

1. Indicate the basis of elevation for the water surface elevation determined in the report. Provide a benchmark location that can be used for the elevation certificate required for the proposed house. Indicate the source of the contours that were used for the analysis.
2. Revise the Mannings analysis to use a roughness coefficient in the range of 0.060 to 0.80 as shown in table 8.1 of the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson Arizona.
3. Provide an exhibit or exhibits showing water surface contours in at least two locations. The water surface contours must be provided for both existing and proposed conditions.
4. Provide a discussion of the erosion hazard setback from the Mosaic Wash. If the proposed structure is within the EHS, suitable erosion protection must be provided.


The Site Plan must revised to provide the following information:

5. Provide a delineation of the area subject to flooding in a 100-year event. This must be in addition to the plotted FEMA flood zone delineation. The area inside the delineated floodprone area must be labeled as "Protected Riparian Area" and must remain undisturbed by development unless approval is received through the overlay review process.
6. Provide a delineation of the erosion hazard setback on the site plan.
7. Provide a note indicating the basis of elevation for the base flood elevation and describing a benchmark for the basis of elevation.
8. Provide a description of the existing easement shown on the site plan. Provide recordation data for the easement.
9. The site plan shows proposed water and sewer connections that may be within the protected riparian area. Utility installation may be allowed within the protected riparian area but will require the overlay review process.

Please revise the site plan and provide a new report addressing these comments. Include a detailed response letter indicating how each comment has been addressed.

If you have any questions or to set up a meeting, contact me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.837.4927.

Loren Makus, E.I.T
Senior Engineering Associate

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/18/2007 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
05/18/2007 DELMA ROBEY REJECT SHELF Completed