Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T07CM00998
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/23/2007 | BETSY COTTLE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 03/30/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/10/2007 | LINHART PETERSEN POERS ASSOC. | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | April 9, 2007 CITY OF TUCSON - FIRST CHECK Tucson Appl. No. T07CM00998 Bureau Veritas Job No. 01007-161001.031 Bill Gansline 7311 Timble View Way Tucson, Az 85750 Re: Plan Review: Grant Road Professional Plaza Shell Bld A Address: 5975 E Gant Road Dear Mr. Gansline, Bureau Veritas North America has completed a first review of the following documents on behalf of the City of Tucson: Plans: Two (2) sets of building plans (60 sheets, A0.1 through S13) sealed by William R Gansline dated March 11, 2007. Structural Calculations: Two (2) sets. These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Codes (i.e., State of Arizona and Tucson amended 2003 IRC, 2003 IMC, 2002 NEC and 2003 IPC). Please submit an itemized response letter and required number of complete and revised documents with all revisions clouded. Sincerely, Bureau Veritas North America Shelley Knuffke ICC Plans Examiner Sk:tm s:\Tucson\01007-161001.031pc1 enclosures Re: Stories: One Occupancy/Const.: B/ VB Building Area (sq. ft.): 8220 A. The following plan review comments are based on the City of Tucson Building Regulations and referred to the 2003 International Building Code. B. Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter. Indicate which detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Your complete and clear responses will expedite the re-check and hopefully, approval of this project. Thank you for your assistance. C. These plan review comments are based on building code items only. If site-related comments are applicable to this project, they will be generated by others (e.g., County Engineering, Public Works, Health, etc.). GENERAL COMMENTS: The City of Tucson has not yet adopted the 2006 IBC. All code references must be to the 2003 IBC. Sheets A3.2 states details 71 and 72 are not used, however they are referenced on elevation drawing. Clarify. Provide shop drawings for all steel stairs. Include details. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Shelley Knuffke at (520) 576-8400 between 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., M-F. |
| 04/11/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1: shell building 2: no TI's until sewer fees are paid 3: no wastewater plumbing fixture stubouts 4: needs to permit on-site private sewer-needs DEQ review & approval if over 3000 gal/day- needs to construct HCS(ww 5th floor records couldn't locate any exsisting 8" public HCS)-needs copy of on-site private sewer for base map update. |
| 04/16/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a site plan showing the location of the water meter and the backflow assembly. 2. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1" water meter will be allowed for this project (250 fixture units equates to a demand of 100 GPM (flush valve)). |
| 04/18/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Grant Road Professional Plaza T07CM00998, T07CM00999, T07CM01000 & T07CM01001 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 18, 2007 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved Development/Tentative Plat. 3. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the building plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved site/development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the building plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped approved development/tentative plat, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the site plans packet processed together for site approval. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\grading\t07cm00998.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 05/05/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/30/2007. Site Plan has not been submitted. Review can not be carried out. |
| 05/05/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Provide two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans with the approved building plan set. A site application card (yellow card) with the CDRC approved development plan must be stamped with signatures for DSD site approval by the following reviewing sections; Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, Plumbing and Landscape/NPPO. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/16/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/16/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |