Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T07CM00996
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/13/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Code review section of cover sheet indicates no sprinklers. Sprinklers are required in all R-2 occupancies per 2003 IFC. Indicate existing fire hydrant location(s) on site plan. An additional on site hydrant will probably be required. Refer to C.O.T. amendments to the 2003 IFC (section 508.2 and 508. 3) for spacing requirements. No Parking - Fire Lane signs will be required to insure 20' wide minimum access for Fire Department vehicles. Indicate location of signs on plan. |
| 03/13/2007 | SREEVES1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/30/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Mike Goodman 1035 E. Mabel Street #23 Tucson, AZ 85719 (520) 977-8002 FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T07CM00996 Formerly T06CM00297 (N.W.C) University Duplexes, Various addresses on Lee Street, Elm Street and 3rd Avenue Site Plan Review (3rd review) TRANSMITTAL: April 3, 2007 COMMENTS: 1. Attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 2. DS 2-02 This project is being reviewed as a new multifamily project. Full code compliance is required. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.B This comment has not been addressed. The current lot lines to not reflect the current assessors records map. The location of lot lines is difficult to determine. Revise site plan to show all property lines with a bold line and add the location of all property pins using a circle or other standard symbol. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 This comment as not been addressed. Provide City of Tucson approved documentation for the 2001, 2003, 2004 & 2006 lot split/combos which have been done in regards to this property. This comment has not been addressed. Provide documentation for the lot combination. A lot combination is required. If a lot reconfiguration or lot combination has been approved for any portion of this project, provide a copy of the approved documents. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t06cm00297-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan, lot combination documentation and additional requested documents |
| 04/03/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/04/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. The coverage indicated on landscape plan does not appear to meet minimum requirements, for mature plant size refer to http://ag.arizona.edu/pima/gardening/aridplants/aridplant_index.html. Indicate estimated coverage for each individual plant species. 2. The planting plan and layout calculations will include both the proper and common name of each type of plant material. 3. The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4. Revise note pertaining to decomposed granite as necessary. 4. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. Identify irrigation on landscape plan or submit separate irrigation plan. 5. Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. 6. Additional comments may apply |
| 04/05/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. |
| 04/09/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The rim elevations of the upstream sanitary manholes appear to be higher than some of the first floor elevations. Evaluate each building and provide backwater valves as required per Section 710.1, UPC 2003. 2. Show that the routing of the building sewers from the multi-purpose building and building D are in compliance with Sections 313.4 and 313.5, UPC 2003. |
| 05/04/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/15/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/15/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |