Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T07CM00814
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2007 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/14/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Basic Charter School T07CM00814 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 15, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC). Based on a less then 25% expansion of building area, full code compliance is for the effected area only. All proposed changes to the vehicle use area (parking & paals) will be required to meet current code requirements. 2. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan. 3. It appears that this project is comprised of two (2) different parcels. There are two (2) options in regards to utilizing the two (2) parcels as one site. Prior to approval of the site plan provide; 1) A Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property, or 2) Provide a site plan for each parcel that shows how the parcels can stand alone and meet the requirements of the LUC if sold separately along with a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. 4. Add a note to the plan stating "THIS SITE PLAN IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OVERLAY ZONES CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE and Sec. 2.8.4, GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE". 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, show watercourses, Arroyo Chico runs through the southern portion of this site. Include the adjacent section corners on the location map. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide all lot dimensions and bearings on the plan. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 For all existing and proposed buildings and structures provide height, and if applicable overhangs and canopies. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 As there are no building heights provided, zoning is unable to verify required zoning setbacks. Provide building heights. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B the required street setback is twenty-one (21) feet or the height of the proposed building wall (H), measured from the back of future/existing curb, whichever is greater. Label the future/existing curb on the plan and provide dimension from the back of future curb to the proposed expansion. Provide building setbacks to all property lines. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The provided handicapped vehicle parking space detail does not meet the minimum width requirements for Van Accessible parking. Per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 the minimum width of the parking space maybe 96 inches, as long as the minimum width of the access aisle is 96 inches. Or the van accessible width maybe 132 inches with a 60 inch access aisle. Either way the access aisle may be used for two handicapped parking spaces. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide the following dimension on the typical vehicle parking space detail. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.7.2 provide the 'C' space depth and 'E' curb length dimension. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per the IBC Sec. 1106.5 for every six or fraction of six accessible parking spaces, at least one shall be a van-accessible parking space. Indicate where the van-accessible parking space is located. The typical detail for the handicapped parking space does not reflect the requirements for a van accessible handicapped space. See ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec 502.2 for the minimum requirements. The detectable warnings are shown incorrectly, See ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec 406.13 for location. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The handicapped signage detail does not meet the minimum requirements. The dimension from grade to bottom of sign is 7'-0", see attached. 13. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.9 Bicycle parking provided on the site plan does not meet the requirements of revised D.S. 2-09. Per D.S. 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s). Show the main entrance on the plan so that this distance can be verified. The type of rack specified does not meet the two-point support system angle (D.S. 2-09.2.3). See D.S. 2-09 Figures 2 & 3 for Acceptable Bike Racks. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (D.S. 2-09.3.2). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (D.S. 2-09.5.1.A). Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised DS may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf. The detail should also include materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required. Additional comments may be forth coming. 14. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided any obstruction over six (6) inches in height and the back of spur. This said the "EXISTING PIPE BOLLARDS" shown at the east end of the north parking area access lane (PAAL) will need to be removed. 15. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Provide a curb access ramp at the handicapped access aisle. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13 16. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Provide a dimension for the width of the sidewalk that is located between the northeast corner of the proposed expansion and the proposed handicapped parking space. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards. 18. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.18 Label Broadway Blvd as an MS&R and GCZ Route. 19. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. 20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting. 21. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.30 Show the development plan number D02-0010 in the lower right hand corner near the title block. 22. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.30 Show the zoning case number C9-02-08 in the lower right hand corner near the title block. 23. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.31 Under the proposed use provide the "SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.3.7 AND SEC. 3.5.13.5. 24. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide the allowed Floor Area Ration (FAR) along with the proposed FAR on the plan. The "29% < 35%, THEREFORE NO CODE UPGRADES PER L.U.C. REQ'D" listed under the "PROPOSED F.A.R." is incorrect. Floor Area Ratio does not establish requirements for LUC code upgrades, remove from plan. Building expansion may require code upgrades, see comment 26. 25. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Per LUC 3.5.3.7.G the required "PASSENGER DROP-OFF AREAS. Passenger drop-off parking areas shall be provided at a ratio of one (motor vehicle parking space (parallel) for every twenty (20) students. Zoning acknowledges five (5) parallel drop-off areas, where are the remaining three (3) parallel drop-off areas. 26. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a percentage of building area expansion. 27. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t07cm00814.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 03/15/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
| 03/15/2007 | SSHIELD1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/23/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is ten thousand (10,000) square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows. § If the expansion is less than fifty (50) percent, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. § If the expansion is fifty (50) percent or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a fifty (50) percent or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site. Provide last approved site and landscape plan for review 2. Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. 3. The site plan has been reviewed by the Landscape / NPPO Section but cannot approve the plan until all the Zoning Division, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed. |
| 03/23/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. |
| 03/23/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 6, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM00814 PROJECT NAME: Addition to Basic Charter School PROJECT ADDRESS: 3434 East Broadway Blvd. PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Provide the last approved site plan with the next submittal. The proposed plan must be compared to the last approve site plan to verify previously approved requirements. 2. Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D. Include the Section with the Town and Range. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets. Show the section lines and label. The lettering shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4. 3. Provide lot dimensions and bearings for the boundary of the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5. 4. Future site visibility triangles (SVT) have not been provided on the site plan. Provide future SVTs or if the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. 5. The far side SVT at the 22' exit only does not have the correct length. A pedestrian SVT is required for the exit, which has a length of 30'. Revise the site plan accordingly. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. 6. For safety purposes provide a "Do not Enter" sign at the 22' exit only. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11. 7. Show the location of the existing curb cut and indicate on the plan view the existing curb cut will be closed. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11. 8. The current proposal for the new curb cut does not meet the Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG). Entrance and exit drives located on a arterial road are limited to 2 per 300' of street frontage. This office acknowledges the existing curb cut locations do not meet the guidelines of TAMG. It is recommended to contact Jose Ortiz from Traffic Engineering for guidance on a solution. He can be contacted at 837-6730. 9. Provide existing drainage patterns for the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 10. Provide on the plan view existing finish grades and the finish floor elevation for the structure. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 11. Provide a general note, "cut and fill quantities equal zero." DS 2-02.2.1.A.170 12. Indicate the book and page for Broadway Blvd and that the street is public. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. 13. Label the 60' ROW dimension for Broadway Blvd., "MS and R 60' ROW." DS 2-02.2.1.A.19. 14. Dimension from the centerline of Broadway to the existing and future curb and sidewalk location. If the locations are coincident, label it as both existing and future. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19., 21. 15. If applicable graphically show any easements that effect the property. Provide the recordation data (book and page). DS 2-02.2.1.A.20. 16. Provide existing topographic contours and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on the City of Tucson Datum, with City book and page included. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. 17. A minimum distance of 3' is required for a back up spur. The back up spur does not meet the minimum requirement because of the location of the bollards. Remove the bollards to meet the minimum requirements. DS 3-05.2.2.D. 18. Provide a curb access ramp at the new 22' exit curb cut location. Detectable warnings are required at all curb access ramps. A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13 19. Please note that subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. |
| 04/05/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/10/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/10/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |