Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T07CM00729
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/23/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/23/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET 2; FLOOR PLAN AT TOP OF SHEET: NOTE AT NEW NORTH WALL INDICATES TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL IS REINFORCED BLOCK WALL. NOTE AT NEW EAST WALL INDICATES TYPICAL EXTERIOR IS WOOD STUD. CLARIFY WHAT IS TYPICAL. SPECIFY SOUTH WALL CONSTRUCTION. 2. NEED TO FILL OUT SPECIAL INSPECTION FORM FOR EPOXY ANCHORS, FOOTING REINFORCEMENT PLACEMENT, AND MASONRY WALLS. FORMS TO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. SHEET 3; DETAIL 3: NOTE TO 'SEE SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE'. WHERE IS SCHEDULE? 4. SHEET 3; DETAIL 3: SUPPLY ACTUAL LEDGER SIZE. 5. SHEET 3; DETAIL 1: THE TWO MASONRY NOTES NEED TO BE CORRECTED. REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 6. SHEET 3; DETAIL 2: REVISE SLAB SAW CUT NOTE. 7. SHEET 3; DETAIL 6: THIS CONDITION DOES NOT EXIST. VERIFY. 8. SHEET 3; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: SHOW SECTIONS CONCERNING THE NEW GLU-LAM BEAM (JOIST BEARING AT NEW ROOF, PENETRATION AT SHEAR WALL). 9. SHEET 3; STRUCTURAL LUMBER NOTE: TABLES REFERENCED AS IBC ARE ACTUALLY IRC. REVIEW AND REVISE. 10. SHEET 3; LINTEL TABLE: DOUBLE ANGLE LINTEL SHOULD HAVE HORIZONTAL LEG ON BOTTOM. 11. SHEET 4; DETAIL 3: WHAT IS 2" DIMENSION ON DOUBLE ANGLE LINTEL? ANGLE HAS 5" VERTICAL LEG. CLARIFY. 12. SHEET 3; ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND FOUNDATION PLAN: WHAT IS THE AREA TO THE EAST OF THE NEW BUILDING? IS THIS COVERED? WHAT ARE THE FOUNDATIONS? ARE FOUNDATIONS ON NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES? VERIFY. 13. LATERAL ANALYSIS FOR SHEAR WALLS (MASONRY AND WOOD) IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE. |
| 04/23/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 04/29/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/29/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/29/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/29/2008 | RSHERRY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | No new plumbing fixtures. |
| 05/01/2008 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1) Identify panel and circuit number for each new electrical load. 2) Provide lighting fixture schedule and cut sheets. 3) Provide panel schedule and load calculations. 4) Provide a legend, or key to symbols. 5) Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. 6) Specify conduit and conductor size and type. 7) Demonstrate compliance with the Tucson Lighting Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/Tucson_Lighting_Code.pdf. |
| 05/14/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Arizona Cabinet T07CM00729 Building Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 14, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning has completed a cursory review on the plan. Based on how the following comments are addressed additional comments and/or reviews may be required. 2. Upon review of the provided plans it has been determined that this project requires a site review for full code compliance due to a greater than 25% expansion of vehicle use area. The required site plan needs to meet the requirements of the Land Use Code and Development Standards 2-02, 2-08, 2-09, 3-05 at a minimum. 3. All prior comments still apply and additional comments will be will be generated at the time of site review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. I:\planning\building\t07cm000729-3rd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 05/20/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bianca Ramirez, CFM Engineering Associate PROJECT: Arizona Cabinet T07CM00729 Building Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 20, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Engineering Review Section comments regarding the Engineering Review. 1. Engineering has completed a cursory review on the plan. Based on how the following comments are addressed additional comments and/or reviews may be required. 2. Upon review of Zoning comments, it has been determined that the provided plans for this project requires a site review for full code compliance due to a greater than 25% expansion of vehicle use area. The required site plan needs to meet the requirements of the Land Use Code and Development Standards 2-02, 2-08, 2-09, 3-05 at a minimum. 3. All prior comments by other departments still apply and additional comments will be will be generated at the time of site review. If you have any additional questions. Please contact me at Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4928. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/05/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |