Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Permit Number - T07CM00660
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/02/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The grading, site, and NPP plans shall indicate the 50-ft study area, as it appears on the Wash Ordinance Mitigation Plan included with Case # S02-008. Verify that no construction will occur within 50-ft study area. 2. To protect the natural areas, a covenant must be provided with record interest in the natural area in favor of the City of Tucson per LUC 2.8.1.7.D. Submit the required covenant or conservation easement and legal description for review. |
| 03/14/2007 | LINHART PETERSEN POERS ASSOC. | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | March 12, 2007 CITY OF TUCSON - FIRST CHECK Tucson Appl. No. T07CM00660 Bureau Veritas Job No. 01007-161001.018 Mr. Todd Rutledge U.S. Builders 2425 E. Camelback Rd Way #950 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Re: Plan Review: U.S. Builders – Lot 17 Starr Pass Address: 2065 S. Twinkling Starr Dear Mr. Rutledge, Bureau Veritas North America has completed a first review of the following documents on behalf of the City of Tucson: Plans: Two (2) sets of building plans (19 sheets, G1.1 through E1.1) dated February 9, 2007, by Soumya Biswas for Consulting Engineers Corporation. Structural Calculations: Two (2) sets of calculations dated February 9, 2007, by Soumya Biswas for Consulting Engineers Corporation. Geotechnical Report: None submitted with this review. These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Codes (i.e., State of Arizona and Tucson amended 2003 IRC, 2003 IMC, 2002 NEC and 2003 IPC). Please submit an itemized response letter and required number of complete and revised documents with all revisions clouded. Sincerely, Bureau Veritas North America Shelley Knuffke ICC Plans Examiner SK:pc s:\Tucson\1007-161001.018pc1 enclosuresRe: Stories: One Building Area (sq. ft.): 3391 (Livable) 973 (Garage) 920 (Patio) 5284 Total sq. ft. A. The following plan review comments are based on the City of Tucson Building Regulations and referred to the 2003 International Building Code. B. Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter. Indicate which detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Your complete and clear responses will expedite the re-check and hopefully, approval of this project. Thank you for your assistance. C. These plan review comments are based on building code items only. If site-related comments are applicable to this project, they will be generated by others (e.g., County Engineering, Public Works, Health, etc.). GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: The City of Tucson has adopted the 2003 IRC. Remove all other references. Remove all notes “Preliminary set – Not for construction”. Provide an accurate index to drawings on the first sheet of the set. FLOOR PLAN COMMENTS: All “specs” that are referenced on plan must be provided. Indicate the location of the T and P relief line from the water heater to the exterior of the building. Note the T and P relief line to be full size steel pipe or hard drawn copper tubing extending to the exterior of the building and terminating in a downward position not more than 2 feet or less than 6 inches above grade. The T and P relief line shall not terminate over walkways, patios, carports or other similar areas. IRC Section P2803.6.1. Openings between the garage and residence shall be equipped with solid wood doors not less than 1 3/8-inch thick, or shall be 20-minute fire-rated doors and shall be maintained self-closing and self-latching. Amendment to IRC Section R309.1. Every sleeping room and basement with habitable space shall have a least one window minimum net clear opening 5.7 square feet (minimum 5 square feet net clear opening at grade floor), minimum opening width of 20 inches, minimum opening height of 24 inches and the finished sill height shall not be more than 44 inches above the floor; or provide exterior door for emergency egress. IRC Section R310.1. Appliances having an ignition source shall be elevated such that the source of ignition is not less than 18 inches above the floor in garages. For the purpose of this section, rooms or spaces that are not part of the living space of a dwelling unit and that communicate with a private garage through openings shall be considered to be part of the garage. IRC Section M1307.3. Glass in hazardous areas shall be safety glass. Specify on applicable floor plans and elevations. IRC Section 308. FIREPLACE REQUIREMENTS: Factory built fireplaces (zero-clearance) shall be listed by an approved listing agency. Specify make and model number and provide the approval number of the testing agency. ELEVATION COMMENTS: Glass in hazardous areas shall be safety glass. Specify on applicable floor plans and elevations. IRC Section 308. FOUNDATION PLAN COMMENTS: Note on the drawings the allowable soil bearing pressure used in the design of the footings. Provide note: Footings shall be on undisturbed soil or approved fill. IRC Section R403. Provide note: All plates (interior and exterior, load bearing and non-load bearing) shall be pressure treated or foundation grade redwood. IRC Section R403.1.6. All slabs and pads, including landings at all doors, shall be shown and their thickness specified. Indicate the slopes for exterior slabs. FRAMING PLAN COMMENTS: Show how veneer is attached. Provide shearwall at corner by slider at master bedroom. Specify lumber grade and species. IRC Section R602. Specify design criteria: floor and roof live and dead loads. IRC Section R301. TRUSS SYSTEMS: Trusses can be submitted as a “Deferred Submittal”. However, they must be submitted and approved prior to their fabrication. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: Provide a minimum 4 inch diameter moisture exhaust vent for clothes dryer, or as required by the clothes dryer’s listing and the manufacturers installation instructions provided that is to be presented prior to construction. IRC Section M1501.1. The Clothes dryer exhaust duct shall be at least the diameter of the appliance outlet and shall terminate on the outside of the building. It shall not exceed 25 feet in length with reductions for bends. The duct shall terminate not less than 3 feet from a property line. IRC Sections M1501 and R302.2. Show condensate line and secondary condensate line. IRC Section M1411.3 and M1411.3.1. PLUMBING COMMENTS: Provide a gas isometric with length of line (horizontal and vertical) to each appliance, BTU demand of each appliance, size of each branch, total demand and size of the meter. Provide a drainage pipe isometric showing all drain, waste and vent piping. Note that drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims located below the elevation of the next upstream manhole cover of the public sewer shall be protected from backflow of sewage by a backwater valve. IRC Section P3008. Specify materials for gas pipes. Provide a detail for island sink venting. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: Smoke alarms shall receive their primary power from the building wiring with battery backup. Wiring shall be permanent without a disconnecting switch other than those required for overcurrent protection. IRC Section R317.2. Smoke alarms cannot be on arc fault circuit. Where ceiling fans are shown on the plans, provide a note indicating that only approved outlet boxes shall be used. NEC Article 370-27©, IRC Section E3904.4, E3805.8 and E4001.6. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Shelley Knuffke at (520) 576-8400 between 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., M-F. |
| 03/19/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/19/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The site and building plans have been denied by Zoning at this time until the grading plan has been approved. Any changes to the site or building plans that are required due to comments related to the grading plan must be made to both the site and building plans. The site and grading plans must match. (GRADING COMMENTS) 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Please address the following zoning comments. a. The grading plan must include the line that represents the 50-foot study area. It appears that the limits of disturbance exceed the limits as depicted on the PPO plan. No construction may occur within the 50-foot study area without review and approval of the special application of the WASH ordinance. If such an application has been processed please submit a copy of the approved and stamped plan with the next submittal package. b. Please verify with the landscape section reviewers about the requirements for a Conservation Easment over a portion of this lot. Provide the required documents for review with the next submittal prior to recordation. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 03/30/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: 2065 S Twinkling Starr Grading Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T07CM00660, T07BU00403 Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the grading/site plan and can not recommend approval at this time. The following comments must be addressed: GRADING PERMIT COMMENTS: 1) Add the following as general notes to Site/Grading Plan. a) CALL FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING. FOR A DSD ENGINEERING INSPECTION, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: HTTP://WWW.CI.TUCSON.AZ.US/DSD/ONLINE_SERVICES/ONLINE_PERMITS/ONLINE_PERMITS.HTML b) A COPY OF THE GRADING PLAN AND GRADING PERMIT SHALL BE KEPT AT THE SITE AT ALL TIMES, UNTIL FINAL GRADING APPROVAL. c) ANY REVISION TO THE GRADING PLAN MAY REQUIRE A RE-SUBMITTAL OF A REVISED GRADING PLAN FOR REVIEW. CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 TO DISCUSS CHANGES IN GRADING DESIGN. d) IF GRADING CONSTRUCTION IS EXPECTED TO LAST LONGER THAN THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THE GRADING PERMIT, CONTACT DSD TO RENEW/EXTEND THE GRADING PERMIT. IF FINAL GRADING INSPECTION HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED BEFORE THE GRADING PERMIT EXPIRES, AND THE PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN RENEWED, ADDITIONAL FEES AND REVIEWS MAY BE REQUIRED. e) SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY WALLS. f) THE PERMITEE SHALL NOTIFY THE DSD WHEN THE GRADING OPERATION IS READY FOR FINAL GRADING INSPECTION. FINAL GRADING APPROVAL SHALL NOT BE GIVEN UNTIL ALL WORK, INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF ANY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND THEIR PERMANENT PROTECTIVE DEVICES, AND ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN AND GRADING PERMIT, AND ALL CONDITIONS OF PERMIT ARE COMPLETED. g) THERE SHALL BE NO DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE/GRADING LIMITS AND NO DISTURBANCE OF THE WASH ORDINANCE AREA AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLAN. 2) On sheet 1, provide delineation of the WASH Ordinance limits of disturbance (similar to sheet N-1) to ensure that there is no encroachment of the WASH Ordinance area. All improvements and construction disturbance including rear yard grading shall be outside of the WASH Ordinance protected area that is not to be disturbed. 3) Resubmit 4 copies of the site/grading plan for resubmittal. I can be reached at 791-5550, ext.2204 if you have questions. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/13/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/13/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |