Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T07CM00531
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: TACO BELL - 1111 S. Wilmot T07CM00531 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 25, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC). Based on a less then 25% expansion of building area, full code compliance is for the effected area only. All proposed changes to the vehicle use area (parking & paals) will be required to meet current code requirements. 2. This comment was not addressed, Zoning could not find the property description on the plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Provide a property description on the plan. 3. This comment was not fully addressed. The dimension shown appears to measured from the property line, not the back of future/existing curb. Also based on the provided building height of 27'-0" the minimum setback should be 27'-0" measured to the back of future/existing curb. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Provide the required zoning street setback for the building on the plan. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B the required setback is 21 feet or the height of the proposed building wall height measured from the back of future/existing curb. Provide the dimension on the plan. 4. Zoning acknowledges the provided parking space details. The detectable warnings (truncated domes) area shown incorrectly. All accessible curb ramps including the flush entrances of buildings shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. Remove all references to ADAAG from the plan. Demonstrate on either the detail or plan that the minimum 3'-0" required landing is provided at the top of the curb ramp and that the same distance is maintained between the proposed handicapped signs and the curb access ramp. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces. 5. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide a plan view which addresses the minimum requirements of 2-09.2.5.1 & 5.2. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.9 Provide off-street bicycle parking; including materials for lighting, paving, and security; location on the plan and the location and type of directional signage if required. Provide a detail(s) for provide off-street bicycle parking which shows; fully dimensioned layout; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. 6. This comment has not be fully addressed. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 the detectable warnings (truncated domes) area shown incorrectly. All accessible curb ramps including the flush entrances of buildings shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. Remove all references to ADAAG from the plan. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13 7. This comment was not fully addressed. The entire site is developed as a Shopping Center, General Merchandise Sales, Development Designator "31". Per LUC Sec. 3.2.3.5.B the allowed FAR is 0.90. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.11.2.C the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is calculated by: Site area x FAR = Floor Area (FA), 182,403 x 0.90 = 164,162.7 FA. Provide on the plan the Allowed Floor Area and the Proposed Floor area. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide the allowed Floor Area Ration (FAR) and provide FAR on the plan. Remove all references to lot coverage from the plan. 8. This comment has not been fully addressed. It appears that the calculation is based on LUC Sec. 3.3.5.6.A, General Merchandise Sales: Shopping Centers, square footage is 50,000 sq. ft. greater and per LUC Sec 6.2.19, the definition of a SHOPPING CENTER. This said each individual space needs to be provided on the parking calculation along with the use based on LUC Sec. 3.3.4. Zoning acknowledges that it appears that the shopping center will be able to meet the definition, and that parking may be able to be parked at 1 vehicle parking space for every 200 sq. ft. Gross Floor Area (GFA) but it must be documented on the plan. It is also unclear what is accurally located on the entire site. Per the most current aerial photos, structures called out on the overall site plan that are shown as future appear to exist on site. There are other structures shown on the plan and labeled with just a square footage do not appear to be on the site at this time. Clarify what is and is not on the site at this time. For the parking calculation clarify what "COMMERCIAL" is. If vacant list it as such on the plan. A vacant suits area calculated as General Merchandise Sales. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Revise the parking calculation to include the entire site. 9. Since this project can not stand alone on its parcel and requires access and parking on adjacent parcels provide a copy of the recorded cross access, vehicle & pedestrian and cross parking agreement. 10. There are phases listed on the overall site plan, clarify what the phase are. 11. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\site\t07cm00531-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 05/25/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
| 06/06/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/08/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 10, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM00531 PROJECT NAME: Taco Bell PROJECT ADDRESS: 1111 South Wilmot Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN APPROVED: HYDROLOGY REPORT SUBMIT: FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT APPLICATION (second request) 1. After reviewing the second submittal it appears most of the corrections for Engineering were provided on the grading plan. The grading plan is required to have mush of the same information as required on a site plan. However the requested information from the first review is required to be provided on the site plan. Consequently many of the comments below are a repeat. 2. Indicate the length of each shown sight visibility triangles (SVT) on the plan view and label the SVT "existing and future." This is the second request. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. 3. Dimension the existing sidewalk within the ROW. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12. This is the second request. 4. Provide a general note on the plan giving the recommended finish floor elevation (FFE) per the submitted drainage report. Include the datum. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15. The above comment is from the first review and has partially been addressed. It is acknowledged the note has been provided however the datum for the recommended FFE was not provided. Include the datum (either NGVD 1929 or NAVD 1988) in the note. 5. This project is required to have a floodplain use permit for the construction of the building and the site infrastructure. Submit a completed floodplain use permit application with the second submittal. This is the second request. 6. Provide general drainage patterns throughout the area to be developed. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. This is the second request. 7. Provide the finish floor elevation of the structure and finish grades throughout the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. This is the second request. 8. Provide cut (if applicable) and fill quantities in cubic yards for the development. Be aware a grading permit may be required. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. This is the second request. 9. Provide the recordation data (book and page) for Wilmot Road. Indicate adjacent to the recordation data that Wilmot Road is public. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. This is the second request. 10. Wilmot Road is designated as an arterial road per the Major Street and Route Plan (MS&R Plan), which subjects the road to future widening. When an arterial road intersects with another arterial road (22nd Street) intersection widening is also required. This project is required to show the intersection widening dimensions. Refer to the diagram located on the lower left hand corner of the MS & R Map found on the following web page, http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/maps/city/msr.pdf. Label the site plan accordingly and show the required future ROW dimensions, including the future curb and future sidewalk location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19. The above comment is from the first review. The response to this comment was the existing and future ROW are the same. If this is the case the label for the provided dimension should read, "existing and future ROW." Revise accordingly. 11. Provide from street centerline a dimension to the existing (and future) curb and sidewalk location. If the existing and future ROW dimensions coincident label as both existing and future. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. This is the second request. 12. Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2' and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on the City of Tucson datum, include the City of Tucson field book and page. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. The above comment is from the first review and the requested information has not been provided. The requested information is a requirement to be shown on the site plan. This office acknowledges this project is small, because of this, it is acceptable if a general note is provided on the site plan referencing the grading plan for the following site information; existing elevations, finish grades and general drainage patterns. Be advised this can be a solution for comments 11, 12, 18 and 19. 13. Surface stormwater should be directed into the landscape areas and the parking lot landscape islands per a new requirement to promote water harvesting. Demonstrate positive drainage towards all landscape areas in effort to promote water harvesting. Revise the site plan to promote water harvesting from the parking lot surface drainage. Provide curb openings where applicable. LUC 3.7.4.3.B. This is the second request, see comment above 18. 14. Indicate a refuse enclosure detail as per D.S. 6-01.4.2. The base shall be a concrete slab with an inside clear dimension of ten (10) feet by ten (10) feet by five (5) inches thick. Steel pipes are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and side walls to prevent the container from damaging the enclosure while being serviced. Enclosure gates have a minimum opening of ten (10) feet. This is the second request, provide this information on sheet SD1.0. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/11/2007 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/11/2007 | THAUSER1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |