Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T07CM00315
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/29/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T07CM00315 3333 E. Cody St. Site Plan - 2nd Review TRANSMITTAL: 08/29/07 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.3 Provide the address of the property on the site plan. The correct address for this project is 3333 E. Cody Street. Revise plan. 2. This comment has not been addressed. DS 2-02.2.1.4 A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. a. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. b. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 3. This project appears to be an expansion of the site located to the west. If this is the case provide the last stamped and approved site plan for the property to the west A tax parcel lot combination and a covenant regarding development and use of real property is required to create one parcel with out property lines Provide recordation information (docket and page) on the site plan for the covenant regarding development and use of real property. Provide copies of the lot combination and covenant with the next submittal. I have attached to the site plan forms for the tax parcel combination and the covenant regarding development and use of real property. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.8 Parking space requirements per LUC Sec. 3.3.4. for Vehicle Rental and Sales requires one (1) space per ten (10) thousand sq. ft. of lot area. In the parking calculations provided for the number of required parking spaces the ratio shown is 1/1,000, revise to 1/10,000 Provide a dimensioned detail of both a standard parking space and the handicap parking space including handicap signage. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.12 A pedestrian circulation path will be required from the handicap parking space and the bicycle parking spaces (see later comment) to the sidewalk located in the right of way. See DS 2-08 for requirements of sidewalk width, separation, materials, etc. Per aerial photos it does not appear that a sidewalk is existing at the access aisle for the handicap ramp. The sidewalk indicated on the site plan cannot enter into the side of the handicap ramp located in the right of way. Handicap ramp at the access aisle for the handicap parking space will be required. Note #18 indicates that the handicap ramp is existing. Per aerial photos it does not appear that a ramp is existing Provide a detail of the handicap ramp indicating slope, width, truncated domes and landing. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Bicycle parking spaces are required based on LUC Sec. 3.3.4 at the rate of 4% of the provided parking spaces with all spaces being class 1. See DS 2-09 for requirements. Note #11 indicates existing bicycle parking, Per aerial photos it does not appear that the bicycle parking space and rack are existing Based on LUC Sec. 3.3.3.5 a minimum of two bicycle parking spaces are required. Per LUC Sec. 3..3.7.8.A Any use providing less than 50 parking spaces may substitute class 2 spaces for class 1 spaces. Provide the location on the site plan of the bicycle parking spaces and access aisle. Provide a dimensioned detail of the bicycle type of rack, clearances, access aisle, surface materials, etc. 7. DS 2-02.2.1.13 If applicable, provide location, type, size and height of any existing or proposed signage including billboards. 8. DS 2-02.2.1.20 If applicable, provide location of all existing or proposed easements and provide docket and page recordation information on the plan. 9. DS 2-02.2.1.25 If applicable, provide existing and proposed lighting layout and type. 10. DS 2-02.2.1.32 If applicable, provide location of the refuse container. See engineering comments. 11. DS2-02.2.2.A.4 Provide in the notes the correct number of required and proposed bicycle parking spaces. 12. Provide a written response to the above comments clearly indicating how each comment has been addressed. 13. Depending on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments, additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\DSC\T06CM00135-2.doc |
| 08/30/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 08/30/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit the last stamped and approved site and landscape plans for the property to the west. 2. Include the required vehicular use area on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.c 3. A 5' wall is required to screen residential properties from vehicle use area per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Show screening elements on the landscape. 4. Plant selections for landscaping are to be from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 9-06.0. Abronia villosa is not on the list. Verbena peruviana or Verbena rigida would be acceptable substitutions. 5. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C 6. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Include any changes to the site plan to the landscape plan as well (See Zoning comments pertaining to site information). 7. Additional comments may apply |
| 09/04/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 5, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM00315 PROJECT NAME: Enterprise Rent a Car PROJECT ADDRESS: 3333 East Cody Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate A response letter was not submitted. Please be advised, this makes the review difficult because it is not clear if the comments have been addressed or not. The intent of a response letter is to communicate to the reviewer how the comment was addressed and to identify the location of where the revision is located on the plan. The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, show the subject property approximately centered in the one (1) square mile area, identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses, section, township and range, north arrow and scale. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4. Second request. 2. All lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or microfilmed for record keeping purposes. The current font measures to 10 point, it must be at least 12 point or greater in size. Revise all lettering to be at least 12 point. Second request. 3. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps or at any area where the sidewalk is flush with the asphalt. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13, D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12. Second request. 4. Dimension on the plan view the width of the new sidewalk located in the ROW. A 5' sidewalk is required within the ROW for all new development along a local street. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12. The above comment is from the previous review and has not been addressed correctly. The plan shows a new 4' concrete sidewalk. A 5' sidewalk is required within the ROW for all new development along a local street. Revise the plan to meet the minimum standard. 5. The Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG) require 18' curb returns at an entrance/exit drive of all local streets. Revise the site plan to meet this criteria. TMAG Table 5-2. Second request. 6. Provide existing drainage patterns. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. The above comment is from the first review and has not adequately addressed. Provide clarification in keynote 15 that the symbol provided on the plan view is the existing drainage patterns or proposed. 7. Provide finish grades throughout the site. Particularly in the area where the 5' openings are located to allow surface water to enter the landscape borders. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. Second request. 8. Include on the site plan estimated cut and fill quantities. If cut and fill quantities equal zero, please note on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. Second request. 9. Provide the book and page for Cody Avenue. Indicate if the street is public or private. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. Second request. 10. Graphically show on the site plan any easements that are located on or adjacent to the property. There is a power pole (keynote 12) to be demolished located in the southeast corner of the property, is this easement going to be abandoned? Clarify and provide the required easement information on the plan view. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20. Second request. 11. Dimension from the street centerline of Cody Avenue to the property line, sidewalk and curb. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. Second request. 12. Provide topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson datum. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. The above comment is from the first review and has not adequately addressed. It is acknowledged the plan shows spot elevation and contours for the existing grades, however the elevations for the contours are not legible. Revise the plan to clearly show the elevations. 13. At this time the Engineering Division has made a determination that a solid waste enclosure will not be required. If a building is added to the proposed development the project must comply with the provisions found in DS 6-01. 14. Please note that subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. |
| 09/06/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/24/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/24/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |