Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T07CM00299
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/12/2007 | WILDAN | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | June 12, 2007 City of Tucson Development Services P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726 RE: Medrano Addition – 2nd REVIEW CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T07CM00299 WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-7029 The second review for the above project has been completed. This letter contains comments which need to be addressed by written responses to each which indicate any actions taken. In order to facilitate a shorter second review, all corrections and revisions must be made on the original plans and two complete new sets of prints, along with one complete redlined set, must be returned to our office. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets, and that all changes have been highlighted with appropriate revision numbers, revision dates, and “cloud bubbles.” Pen or pencil corrections on final prints are not acceptable. This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2003 IRC, 1997 UAC, and the 2003 UPC. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner Antonio Moya. Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms SFR Add. N/A V-B 661 No Smoke ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet 2 Show calculation of attic ventilation area. Note location of all vents needed to comply or show compliance with an accepted Non-vented Roof Method Details 1-8, dated 7/18-19/2001 as permitted by Section R104.11, Alternate Methods. Reference IRC Section R806.2. Comment remains: Not addressed. Cross-sections shall be cross-referenced to the floor plan and framing plans. Reference IRC Section R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Annotate on the plans that the weep screed will be a minimum of 4” above the earth and a minimum of 2” above paved surfaces. Reference IRC Section R703.6.2.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Identify ceiling heights in all areas on floor plan. If sloped ceiling, note average height. Reference IRC Sections R305.1 and R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Please provide cross sections to fully understand all work being done. Reference 2003 IRC Section 106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Please provide a complete demolition floor plan to clarify the extent of work being done. Reference 2003 IRC Section 106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet 2 Note on the drawings the allowable soil bearing pressure used in the design of the footings, or state that the assumed value of 1500 PSF is being used. A soils report is not required unless any portion of the structure is to be supported on fill. Reference IRC Section R401.4. Comment remains: Not addressed. Indicate the slope for exterior slabs. Reference IRC Section R311.6.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. All foundation hold-downs and anchor-bolt spacing for brace walls shall be specified and located on the foundation plan. Reference IRC Section R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Locate and identify brace wall types and locations, along with the appropriate nailing schedule. Reference IRC Section R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Specify lumber grade and species. Reference IRC Section R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Specify lateral support of trusses. Reference IRC Sections R802.10.1 and R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Completely detail all connections and cross-reference to the foundation and framing plans regarding the following: a. Trusses to top plate b. Hold-down locations and types c. Continuous load path for shear transfer d. Straps Nailing Comment remains: Not addressed. Note and detail tie straps, framing anchors, and joist hangers by type, size and required attachment to framing members. Reference IRC Section R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. On the floor framing plan, note and detail double joists parallel to bearing partitions, double trimmers and headers, joists at framed openings, framing anchors for tail joists and header support, and bridging or blocking at the ends and bearing points of the floor joists. Reference IRC Section R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Show details for all bearing and critical non-bearing conditions. Reference IRC Section R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Indicate and note post size, double or triple studs, and coordinate with foundation plan. Reference IRC Section R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Detail all brace wall connections from the foundation to the roof plywood. Reference IRC Section R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. PLUMBING COMMENTS: Sheet 1 Gas: Provide the length of the branch line to each appliance, BTU demand of each appliance, size of each branch, total demand, and total developed length from meter to the most remote appliance on the system. Reference UPC Section 1217.2. Comment remains: Not addressed. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: Sheet 1 Note on plans: “Mechanical shall comply with 2003 IRC Chapters 12-24.” Reference IRC Section M1201.2. Comment remains: Not addressed. Show exhaust fan locations and exhaust duct terminations for bathrooms, water closet compartments and similar rooms in lieu of operable windows. Reference IRC Section R303.3. Comment remains: Not addressed. For gas burning appliances, please provide combustion, ventilation, and dilution air requirements. Reference IRC Section G2407.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. Show on the plans how mechanical fresh air will be provided if using one of the non-vented roof methods. Reference Non-Vented Roof Details dated 7/18-19/2001. Comment remains: Not addressed. Dryer exhaust systems shall be independent of all other systems and shall convey the moisture to the outside of the building. Revise plan. Reference IRC Section M1501.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: Sheet 1 Note on plans: “All electrical work shall comply with 2003 IRC Chapters 33-42.” Reference IRC Section E3301.2 and the City of Tucson Submittal Requirements. Comment remains: Not addressed. Provide an exterior outlet at grade level at the back of the dwelling. These outlets shall be GFCI protected. Reference IRC Sections E3801.7 and E3802.3. Comment remains: Not addressed. Indicate the location of all disconnecting means for the heating units and air handlers,. Reference IRC Section E4001.5 and IRC Table E4001.5. Comment remains: Not addressed. Please provide cut sheets for all the exterior light fixtures shown or noted. The cut sheets need to provide lumens per fixture and show if the fixture is a full cut-off, which means no light is emitted at or above the horizontal plane. Please provide calculations for all exterior lighting fixtures. Reference the City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Comment remains: Not addressed. Cross-reference exterior lighting fixtures on the plans with the cut sheets and calculations submitted. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Requirements. Comment remains: Not addressed. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: Sheet 2 Please submit the required energy code calculations by using the “RES” check program, Chapter 11 of the IRC, or the 2003 IECC, and also annotate on the plans. Reference IRC Section R106.1.1. Comment remains: Not addressed. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. Sincerely, WILLDAN Chris Kiel, C.B.O., M.C.P. Building Official CEK/jk |
| 06/14/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 15, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07OT00402 / T07CM00299 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2607 North Sparkman Blvd. PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT IS DENIED RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT APPLICATION, COST ESTIMATE 1. Any structure which is substantially improved at a cost equal to or exceeding 50% of the full cash value of the structure as shown on the latest assessment rolls from the county assessor or an appraisal from a licensed appraiser with the State of Arizona. The submitted cost estimate exceeds 50% of the value of the structure. The value of the structure based on the submitted appraisal is $71,238. The submitted construction cost estimate was 40,275, equals to a 57% increase in flood damage potential. The Permits Plus system estimated the construction cost at 47,272, equals to a 66% increase in flood damage potential. The proposed addition is considered a "substantial improvement," and must meet the floodplain requirements found in Chapter 26. There are two solutions: 1) Reduce the scope of the project to bring the cost of construction down so the project is not a substantial improvement. 2) Elevate the addition to be one foot above the established water surface elevation. The above comment is from the first review and has not adequately been addressed. It is acknowledged an estimate has been provided that is lower than the previously submitted estimate. However the valuation in the Permits Plus system still values the construction costs at 47,272 which equals to a 66% increase in flood damage potential. That said it appears that the scope of the project has not been reduced to bring the cost of construction down. Provide an approvable solution. 2. Add a general note to the plan that the entire property lies within a City of Tucson Regulatory flood hazard area. This is the second request. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/21/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |