Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T07BU02618
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/16/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved tentative plat including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved plat. |
| 04/22/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 04/22/2008, Laith Alshami, Engineering and floodplain Review, 04/21/2008 Swan/Lee Offices Grading Plan Comments: 1- Provide a copy of the approved Tentative Plat. Please be advised that the grading plan shall be approved only after the tentative plat is approved. 2- Add the following general notes: a. The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work (Replace General Note #8 with this note). b. Any revision to the Grading Plan MAY require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review and approval. Contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in grading design (Replace General Note #7 with this note). 3- Lots 1, 6, 7, 8 and 9 do not appear to meet the differential grading requirements. Revise the proposed pad elevations or verify compliance with the requirements of D.S. 11-01.8.0 4- Resubmit the redlined plan with future Grading Plan submittals. 5- Provide a detailed response letter with the next submittal that explains how the comments were addressed and references the exact locations/sheets where the revisions were made. SWPPP Comments: After checking with AZ Board of Technical Registration and City of Tucson Stormwater Ordinance, we have concluded that the SWPPP Exhibits shall be stamped by a civil Engineer. According to Tucson Code Stormwater Ordinance Sec. 26-42(b): "For land disturbing activities that fall under the jurisdiction of this article, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be prepared and certified by an engineer, or a landscape architect and submitted along with application for a grading permit to the City of Tucson Development Services Department." According to the Vice-Chair of the Board of Technical Registration, if the SWPPP Exhibits are prepared by a registrant "which is required by Tucson Code Stormwater Ordinance Sec. 26-42(b)", the exhibits must be sealed in accordance with the "Arizona Administrative Code R4-30-304.A.1. which states: "A registrant shall place a permanently legible imprint of the registrant's seal and signature on the following: 1. Each sheet of drawings or maps; 2. Each of the master sheets when reproduced into a single set of finished drawings or maps; 3. Either the cover, title, index, or table of contents page, first sheet of each set of project specifications; 4. Either the cover, index page, or first sheet of each addenda or change order to specifications; 5. Either the cover, index page, or first sheet of bound details when prepared to supplement project drawings or maps; 6. Either the cover, title, index, or table of contents page, or first sheet of any report, specification, or other professional document prepared by a registrant or the registrant's bona fide employee; 7. The signature line of any letter or other professional document prepared by a registrant, or the registrant's bona fide employee; and 8. Shop drawings that require professional services or work as described in the Act. Examples of shop drawings that do not require a seal include drawings that show only: a. Sizing and dimensioning information for fabrication purposes; b. Construction techniques or sequences; c. Components with previous approvals or designed by the registrant of record; or d. Modifications to existing installations that do not affect the original design parameters and do not require additional computations. Revise the plans in accordance with the aforementioned comments. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/02/2008 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | May 2, 2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T06BU02618 Grading Plans for S07-122 Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat, as the tentative plat is not yet approved. Please submit one copy of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/06/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/06/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |