Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU02575
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Site plan approval is required prior to grading plan approval. 2) Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the grading plan. 3) Submit a copy of the NPPO plan on which the grading limits are clearly depicted. 4) Add the following notes to the grading plan: NPPO PRE PERMIT INSPECTION MUST BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO GRUBBING OR GRADING. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE DEPRESSED A MAXIMUM OF 6' TO ACCOMODATE WATER HARVESTING. |
| 01/17/2008 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Stephen Magelli, OPW Engineering, LLC REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach, PE SUBJECT: Commercial Parking Lots: As-built/Site Plan and grading reviews LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec17, 2320 East Aragon Rd, Ward 5 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM04647, T07BU02575 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site / grading plan submittal and does not recommend approval at this time. Address the following comments. DRAINAGE REPORT/PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.11-01.16.1.A: Sheet 1 of the grading plan indicates a couple of new elevations. Address the following comments: a) An "As-built" is required for the north parking lot. Label sheet 1 as As-built and seal for as-built. b) Provide sufficient as-built elevations in and around basin for north parking area. Include changes to outlet construction. c) Show total disturbance area on north parking lot, including fill encroachment to north side of wash. d) Show as-built parking striping. Include any copy of the approved revised site plan striping plan. e) Show and label location of storage area at southeast side of north parking area. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise layout to reflect minimum PAAL width shall be shown as 24-ft. 3) DS Sec.2-13: When any disturbing riparian jurisdictional floodplain areas, it is necessary to revise the Environmental Resource Report (ERR) Report explaining new project's hydrology and hydraulics, as well as the ERR aspects for the south parking lot. Assure the ERR report is updated to reflect the new project ERR aspects. a) DS Sec.2-13.2.5.B.1.h: Discuss in report sediment transport characteristics along the watercourse centered on this location. b) DS Sec.2-13.2.5.B.1.i: Discuss in report the existing and any proposed utilities to and across the site. c) DS Sec.2-13.2.5.B.1.o: In the report, provide an ERR map identifying the type, location and extent of all riparian resources and plant associations per landscape comments. d) DS Sec.2-13.2.5.B.1.p: Address the following comments: i) Delineate proposed Protected Riparian Area on a plan view for south parking lot. ii) State total area of the site, iii) State total area of the Protected Riparian Area, iv) State area within the Regulated Area, v) State the total of any areas proposed to be disturbed within the Protected Riparian Areas. e) DS Sec.2-13.2.5.B.1.w: Provide a draft Mitigation Plan in conformance with DS Sec.2-13.3 if development is proposed within the Protected Riparian Areas as determined by Landscaping. f) DS Sec.2-13.2.5.B.2. h: State that temporary heavy duty construction fencing is required for south parking area. No grubbing, grading, or construction will occur on a project site which includes areas designated as Protected Riparian Area to be retained in a natural state until those designated areas are temporarily fenced. The temporary fencing shall remain in place during all phases of construction that could affect the Protected Riparian Area. g) Provide summary or conclusion to the report stating that the new project is in compliance with ERR and DS standards. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Show improvements to Elvira Road - sidewalk and curb. 5) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: On the Private Paving and Grading Improvement plan sheets, address the following comments: a) Show extents of existing and proposed disturbance area for north and south parking on the planview, clarifying proposed disturbance area for south parking and as-built / existing disturbance for north parking area along wash to clarify construction extents. b) Label temporary construction fence on plan view and sections. c) Provide total area of disturbance for south parking area on plan. d) On the plan, clarify estimated cut and fill quantities for the new south parking area addition, including removal of all stockpile materials as determined by geotechnical report. e) DS Sec.2-02.2.1: Show all existing easements for south parking area on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. f) Show existing and proposed fencing / wall along south boundary of south parking area where opening exists. 6) DS Sec.11-01.16.1: Submit a soils /geotechnical final report that includes percolation testing for north Retention basin, assessment of existing stockpiles at south portion of parcel, recommendations for use of stockpile soils / earthwork of existing materials, and recommendations for pavement section. 7) Due to encroachment along the wash at the north parking lot, a Floodplain Use Permit Application T07OT00863 for the project may be used for a revised floodplain use permit for the project, or a new application may be submitted. The Floodplain Use Permit will be reviewed concurrently with the site and grading plan resubmittal. 8) If the total area including both parking areas (parking overlaps same parcel) are one acre or more, submit a SWPPP. For resubmittal provide three copies of the revised site & grading plan sheets, copy of the soils report, a Floodplain Use Permit Application, and a response letter. Call to discuss revision to ERR, or if you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 01/23/2008 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | January 23, 2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T07BU02575 Grading Plans for T07CM04647 2320 East Aragon Road Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. In addition, we could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with a site plan for this site approved by Zoning Review. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped Site Plan, Landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/27/2008 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |