Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T07BU02392
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/24/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 25, 2008 SUBJECT: 3262 E 44th St Site/Grading Plan- 3rd Engineering Review TO: Paul Nzomo LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec28 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T07CM04377 (Site Plan) and T07BU02392 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T07CM04377), revised grading plan (T07BU02392), and Drainage Report (Coronado Engineering and Development, 01OCT07 revised 21FEB08) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: For standard driveway entrances review and approval from Tucson Department of Transportation, Jose Ortiz, P.E., is required. Approval from TDOT was not submitted with this review for the use of standard driveway aprons. Provide an email or approval letter from Jose Ortiz with TDOT approval for the proposed design. Depict and label the 18-feet radii concrete curbs returns per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at the proposed driveway entrances. 2) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.12: A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow a sidewalk that does not meet the minimum 5-foot width requirements. The DSMR must be approved prior to site plan approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. This comment was not fully addressed with this submittal. Provide the approved DSMR for the existing 4-foot sidewalk. Or revise the site plan to dimension and construct the required 5-foot wide sidewalk along the street frontage of 44th Street. Refer to DS Sec.3-01 for all curb and sidewalk requirements. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Revise the site plan to relocate the proposed maintenance building outside of the calculated Erosion Hazard Setback Area (EHSB). Structures can not be located within the calculated EHSB, either revise the site plan to relocate the building or provide a discussion on the stabilization method used to reduce the EHSB and allow the building to remain as proposed. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Review and approval from Pima County Regional Flood Control District is required for all drainage improvements proposed into their right-of-way and/or infrastructure. This comment was not fully addressed with this submittal. Provide a copy of the approved PCRFCD Floodplain Use Permit and list all conditions of this permit on the site plan. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: The project was reviewed for grading plan purposes, however until all site plan and Drainage Report comments are addressed the grading plan could not be shown to be in conformance with an approved plan. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Review and approval from Pima County Regional Flood Control District is required for all drainage improvements proposed into their right-of-way and/or infrastructure. This comment was not fully addressed with this submittal. Provide a copy of the approved PCRFCD Floodplain Use Permit and list all conditions of this permit on the site plan. 6) Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. DRAINAGE REPORT: 7) Per the discussion provided in the Drainage Report on the required erosion hazard setback line for the Tucson Diversion Channel the maintenance building is now located within the ESHB area. Revise the site plan and grading plan to relocate the structure outside of the calculated ESHB or provide a discussion on the stabilization methods to allow the building with in the ESHB area. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 8) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: A geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review. The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. This comment is applicable since the maintenance building is proposed within the EHSB area. If the building is relocated outside of the EHSB area then this comment will not apply. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, grading plan, Drainage Report, geotechnical report, and a PCRFCD Floodplain Use Permit that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site/grading plan review. If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 06/25/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Until the site plan has been approved by all divisions and the grading plan is approved by landscape and engineering divisions, zoning cannot approve the grading plan. Zoning review of the grading plan will continue when the above has been completed. |
| 07/01/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/02/2008 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/02/2008 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |