Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T07BU02333
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 01/17/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Eagle Globall Logistics - Loading Dock Addition T07BU02333 Grading Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 19, 2007 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t07bu02333-2nd RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plans and additional requested documents |
| 02/01/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 1, 2008 SUBJECT: 2859 E Elvira Road Site/Grading Plan- 3rd Engineering Review TO: Metro Permits Express Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec17 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T07CM04272 (Site Plan) and T07BU02333 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T07CM04272), revised grading plan (T07BU02333), and Drainage Report (DOWL Engineers, 01NOV07) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: Review of the architect site plan, civil grading plan and building plan sheets show inconsistencies between all three sets of plans. The architect and civil plans must be in conformance with each other and match in details, keynotes and dimensions. The building plan set must also reflect the proposed site plan and grading plan sheets. Verify that all three plans match and that there are not discrepancies within the sets of plans. 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.7: Provide the recordation information for a lot combination. It is acknowledged that a lot combo/lot split has been processed, however the site plan and grading plan must reflect the new property lines. Provide the approved lot combo/lot split with the next submittal for clarity. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Review of the site/grading plan still shows a 5-foot electric easement that falls within the location of the proposed loading dock area that may have maintenance access obstruction issues with the proposed improvements. Obtain a letter from all entities having a recorded interest in any easements, as shown on the proposed site plan that will be obstructed by the construction of the proposed loading dock structure. Each entity must provide a letter stating that they do not have any issues with the proposed loading dock being constructed over the existing easements. The comment "Utility redlines are forthcoming" does not meet this requirement. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: The project was reviewed for grading plan purposes, however until all site plan comments are addressed the grading plan could not be shown to be in conformance with an approved plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and revised grading plan that address the comments provided above. For expedite purposes the site plan can be reviewed over the counter (DSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. The revised grading plan must be reviewed in house in order to digitize the revised plan and get it to our Records Department. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review. If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |