Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU02333
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/07/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Eagle Globall Logistics - Loading Dock Addition T07BU02333 Grading Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 7, 2007 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t07bu02333 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plans and additional requested documents |
| 11/16/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 11/27/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 28, 2007 SUBJECT: 2859 E Elvira Road Site/Grading Plan- Engineering Review TO: Metro Permits Express Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec17 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T07CM04272 (Site Plan) and T07BU02333 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T07CM04272), grading plan (T07BU02333), and Drainage Report (DOWL Engineers, 01NOV07) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan, grading plan or Drainage Report at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: Review of the architect site plan, civil grading plan and building plan sheets show inconsistencies between all three sets of plans. The architect and civil plans must be in conformance with each other and match in details, keynotes and dimensions. The building plan set must also reflect the proposed site plan and grading plan sheets. Verify that all three plans match and that there are not discrepancies within the sets of plans. 1) See redlines on Sheets A2.0, A3.0, C1.0 and C1.1 for all corrections required for the next submittal. Due to the numerous errors and differences between all of the plan sheets (architect site plan, civil grading plan and building plan set) the following comments do not reflect all of the Quality Control comments that must be addressed prior to resubmittal. Make sure that all dimensions radii, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project match and are reflected on all the plan sheets. Provide comments on the redlined plan sheets that show how each comment was addressed. 2) Revise the site plan to provide a legend for the numerous keynotes that are shown on Sheet AO.1. All keynotes must be referenced as to their purpose. 3) Revise or clarify Sheet A1.0 and the Demolition Notes. Specifically Keynotes A-H could not be located in plan view, clarify. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.2: Provide the property description (legal description) on the site plan. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the project location map on Sheet AO.1 to label section corners and identify conditions within the square mile area shown, such as major watercourses (Airport Wash). 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.7: Revise the site plan to show cross access agreements, with recordation information, between the parcels. Since the parcels are identified as having separate tax code identification numbers a cross access agreement is required for all access points from one parcel to the other parcel. Or provide the recordation information for a lot combination. The Zoning Department prior to site plan approval must approve the lot combination. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Provide the existing sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the site plan to be in conformance with DS Sec.3-01.5. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Provide the recordation information for Elvira Road shown on Sheet AO.1. Label the road as private or public. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Label the existing right-of-way width for Elvira Road. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Revise the platted easement that is shown on Sheet AO.1 to meet the minimum 12-point font size. Verify that all other easements of record are graphically shown on the site plan together with recording docket and page reference. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the Trash Enclosure Detail on both the Architect site plan and Civil grading plan sheets. Provide the minimum dimensions for the enclosure that meets or exceeds the standards within the attached Figure 3 per DS Sec.6-01 for the required refuse enclosure construction. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: The project was reviewed for grading plan purposes, however until all site plan and Drainage Report comments are addressed the grading plan could not be shown to be in conformance with an approved plan. 12) Verify that the rock riprap meets the minimum sizing, thickness, method of placement (hand placed, dumped, or grouted) and type of filter fabric that is to be used for the slope stability along the north portion of the project that is called out in the revised Drainage Report. The drainage statement must comply with the recommendation within the required geotechnical report. 13) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide a General Note stating that all fencing and walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments. 14) Provide a general note on the grading plan to state the following; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 15) DS Sec.11-01: Provide general grading notes, including a grading/drainage note specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). 16) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the site plan, Drainage Report and geotechnical report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 17) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a geotechnical report evaluation that addresses the following: a) Soils report should provide a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils. Report should address building setback from the proposed water harvesting basins. b) Provide slope stability recommendations for all proposed constructed slopes. c) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. DRAINAGE REPORT: 18) Provide a discussion within the Drainage Report with calculations for the proposed rock riprap sizing, thickness, method of placement (hand placed, dumped, or grouted) and type of filter fabric that is proposed for the slope stability along the north portion of the project. The drainage statement must comply with the recommendation within the required geotechnical report. 19) Provide a discussion on the proposed trench drain that is shown in the building plan set, Sheet S4.1, detail 106 that is located at the beginning of the proposed loading dock. The site plan and civil sheets do not address this improvement. Provide calculations, details and method of disposal for the trench drain if it is proposed to carry stormwater away from the loading dock and into a water harvesting area. 20) Provide a revised Drainage Report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk at all down spout and scupper locations. Provide a detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, grading plan, Drainage Report, and geotechnical report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter and comments on the redlined sheets addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review. If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/11/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |