Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T07BU02193
Parcel: 14117015B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T07BU02193
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/01/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit a copy of the development plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved plans.
11/07/2007 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

11/07/07

David Rivera
Principal Planner


Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. Zoning did a preliminary review of the grading plan and compared it to the copy of the unapproved development plan and while it appears to be similar to the DP under review, items of concern have been noted. Address the following items on the grading plan and development plan.

a. There are are two areas on the plan that have been depicted with truncated domes in the wrong locations. The domes must be placed next to the access aisle (flush area of the access ramp) where the sidewalk transitions from the sidewalk to the access aisle.

b. Please review the plan and revise as required. Again, as noted above this grading plan has been reviewed with an unapproved development plan. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the development plan. All changes must be made to both the development plan and the grading plan or visa versa.

Please include with the grading plan package two copies of the CDRC approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved development plan.
12/11/2007 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 10, 2007
SUBJECT: Grading Plan
TO: Andrew Ogas
LOCATION: 10410 E Rita Ranch Road, T15S, R15E, Section 25, Ward 4
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T07BU02193 (First Review)


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed grading plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the grading plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.


Grading Plan:

1. Provide a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Grading Plan.
2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
3. Provide North arrow, scale and contour interval.
4. Correct administrative address/site address on plans to read 10410 E Rita Ranch Road.
5. Provide Section, Township, and range; section corners for location map
6. Identify major watercourses within the one square mile
7. Provide limits of grading on grading plan.
8. Show cross section PAAL with transverse and longitudinal slopes.
9. Provide roof drainage arrows.
10. Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations for proposed building at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required, refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk.
11. Label 5' sidewalk along Rita Ranch Road as existing.
12. The proposed turnaround location on the adjacent vacant property requires an access easement. Provide a copy of the documentation for the cross access agreement between the two properties and the easement recordation data on the plan. Indicate on the plan if the easement is public or private.13. Depict and label 25-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at the driveway entrance along Rita Ranch Road. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement and entirely on the subject property, which must also be depicted on the site plan OR provide approval from Jose Ortiz 520-791-4259 with the City of Tucson, Transportation Department.
14. Provide spot elevations for the bottom of the channel and for the right and left top bank of existing concrete channel.
15. Provide additional spot elevations though out PAAL to indicate grade breaks and directions of flow.
16. Provide geotechnical report for recommendations for building pad bench.
17. Provide curb and gutter elevations that include drainage flow with percent slope.
18. Provide details of all surface materials.
19. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
20. Call out all slopes and stabilization material (concrete, riprap, gabbions or vegetation).
21. Slopes of 3H: 1V require hand placed riprap.
22. Slopes of 2H: 1V or greater require grouted riprap.
23. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line. Depict 2' setback on all details provided.
24. Drainage patterns with percent slopes (Show patterns within the first 100 feet from the property line).
25. Provide flow arrows, grades and flow rates within and adjacent to site to show drainage scheme.
26. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site.
27. Provide copy of the Master Drainage Report for Rita Ranch illustrating that this site is included in area for on site retention.
28. Show details of all surface and subsurface drainage devices.
29. Revise the grading plan to call out Rita Ranch Road as a Major Streets and Routes (MS&R). Provide a note stating that the site plan is in conformance with the MS&R overlay zone criteria. Label Rita Ranch Road as Public. In addition, provide recordation information for Rita Ranch Road.
30. Provide distance from driveways of adjacent properties.
31. Show or provide on the site plan and in details that all handicap access ramps at crosswalks or at the transition of a pedestrian circulation area to a vehicular use area have required detectable warning devices.
32. Show grading plan activity number on each sheet in the lower right hand corner of each sheet.
33. See attached Solid Waste Disposal (Refuse) detail enclosed and modify detail as necessary.
34. The Development Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Development Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Development Plan and Grading Plan must match. The grading plan cannot be approved prior to the approval of the development plan.
35. Provide explanation for Bold line just south of the proposed building. Remove if not required.
36. Explain if there is a wall along the east property line. Provide appropriate information if wall is proposed or existing. Wall opening will be required if it is representing a wall.
37. Provide curb stop at end of paving located along eastern side of building.
38. Provide scupper under sidewalk along Rita Ranch Road and provide Q100 along with direction of flow.
39. Modify truncated domes so that they are located along the entrance of and PAAL.
40. Provide adequate pedestrian access to trash enclosure. Sidewalk to trash enclosure is required.
41. Engineering could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. Engineering has performed a preliminary review of the grading plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Drainage report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Drainage Report.
2. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the Drainage Report.

Stormwater pollution prevention plan:
City of Tucson Submittal Requirements:

Operators

1. Identify the areas over which each operator has control. (Part IV.C.1)
2. Indicate in the SWPPP the name(s) of the party(ies) with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). (Part IV.B.2.c)
3. Indicate in the SWPPP the areas of the project where the operator has operational control over project specifications, including the ability to make modifications in specifications. (Part IV.B.1.b)
4. Indicate in the SWPPP the name(s) of the party(ies) with day-to-day operational control of those activities necessary to ensure compliance with the SWPPP or other permit conditions. Provide a table for recording the names and responsibilities for each party responsible for activities necessary to ensure compliance with the SWPPP or other permit conditions. (Part IV.B.1.d)
5. Indicate in the SWPPP the areas of the project where each operator has operational control over day-to-day activities. (Part IV.B.2.c)

Site Description

6. Describe the project and its intended use after the NOT is filed (e.g. low density residential, shopping mall, highway, etc.) (Part IV.C.2.a)
7. Provide data describing the soil and any existent data on the quality of any discharge from the site. (Part IV.C.2.d)
8. Provide a general location map (e.g., U.S.G.S. quadrangle map, a portion of a city or county map, or other map) with enough detail to identify the location of the construction site and the receiving waters within one mile of the site. (Part IV.C.2.e). Show on the location map the receiving waters within one mile of the construction site. (Part IV.C.2.e)
9. Identify the nearest receiving water(s), including ephemeral and intermittent streams, dry sloughs, arroyos. (Part IV.C.4)
10. All SWPPP requirements must be met per ADEQ requirements. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for this project does not meet the minimum requirements of the ADEQ Construction General Permit. ADEQ provides a checklist for SWPPP preparation. The SWPPP checklist can be obtained from the ADEQ website at: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/cswppp.pdf. Include a completed SWPPP checklist with the SWPPP. In the checklist clearly describe the location within the SWPPP for each required element.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov
Bianca Ramirez
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4928 office
(520) 879-8010 fax

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/17/2007 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/17/2007 CINDY AGUILAR REJECT SHELF Completed