Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU01910
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/19/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved development plan including landscape plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved development plan. |
| 11/29/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | November 29, 2007 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T07BU01910 Grading Plans for D07-0018 Address Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. In addition, we could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan for Zoning Review. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped Development Plan, Landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 12/11/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 12, 2007 SUBJECT: 6171 E Park Place Grading Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Paul Nzomo, P.E. LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec13 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T07BU01910 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the grading plan (T07BU01910), Drainage Report Addendum 1 (Coronado Engineering and Development, 30OCT07) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (Coronado Engineering and Development, 19OCT07) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the grading plan or Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) at this time. The following items need to be addressed: GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: The project was reviewed for grading plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) purposes, however until all Development Plan comments are addressed the grading plan could not be shown to be in conformance with an approved plan. Further comments may be forth coming depending on the revisions to the Development Plan. 1) Provide a copy of the last approved Development Plan (D07-0043). The grading plan will not be approved until verification that all details, locations, dimensions, and plan profiles match the approved Development Plan. Provide all information associated with the Development Plan and the additional information that is required on the grading plan that will be used as the construction document. 2) Revise the sidewalk and handicap access ramps shown around the hotel, as shown on the grading plan, to show the proper transition with the sidewalk and handicap access ramp. Per COT Standard the sidewalk is supposed to transition into the 5-foot landing that is required at the top of the ramp to meet ADA compliance. Per the plan view the sidewalk transitions into the access ramps at the side slopes, which does not meet ANSI requirements. Provide all dimension and maximum slopes for the access ramps and verify that the revision meets the design requirements per ANSI Standards A117.1-2003 Section 406.13. 3) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.4: Revise the grading plan to show roof drainage, with flow arrows, to match the down spout locations (this was not addressed from last comment letter). Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. 4) Revise the reference to the floodplain zones shown on sheet 1 and 2. The "Zone X" classification should read "Shaded Zone X 100-year," revise both sheets. 5) Label and dimension the minimum PAAL widths and PAAL intersections for all PAALs shown on the grading plan. Refer to Redlines for specific locations. All 2-way and 1-way PAALs, entries, and intersections must be dimension to verify that the minimum 24-foot width has been meet. 6) Revise Sheet 2 of the grading plan to label the PAAL centerline of Park Place to the south of the project. Provide the width dimension for the PAAL at this location. 7) DS Sec.3-05: Verify how the parking lot is constructed along the eastside of the project adjacent to the surrounding parcel. Label 6-inch curbs or provide wheel stops to prevent vehicles from driving offsite or damaging the landscaping that is between the 2 adjacent parcels. 8) Revise Detail 1 and plan view to show the required unobstructed 2.5-foot overhang from the wheel stop to the pedestrian circulation. The handicap signs can not be located within the required 2.5-foot overhang. 9) Provide approval from the Landscaping Section for Details 2 and 11 for the landscape islands within the parking lot to verify that the required 2.5 foot overhang does not prevent damage to the tree landscaping once planted. Per the details there does not appear to be enough room for the landscaping once the trees grow to maturity. 10) LUC Sec.3.4.4.2: Label and dimension the required maneuvering area for all loading zones that are shown on the grading plan. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. 11) Provide the recordation information for the 15-foot public utility easements and the 20-foot private sewer easement shown on Sheet 2. The grading plan can not be approved until all easements have been recorded. 12) DS Sec.6-01: Verify that the Trash Enclosure Detail on Sheet 2 meets the minimum requirements of DS Sec.6-01. Provide the minimum refuse enclosure requirements per the attached Figure 3 (included with the hard copy of the comment letter) per DS Sec.6-01 for the required refuse enclosure dimensions and construction. 13) DS Sec.11-01: Revise Grading Note #6 to reference the correct grading/drainage note specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). 14) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report and geotechnical report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 15) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.6: Provide the Geotechnical Report referenced in the Grading Note #5 as shown on Sheet 1. The geotechnical evaluation needs to address the following: a) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. b) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). The SWPPP report must be signed and sealed by the engineer of record just like the Exhibits. 16) Provide 3 copies of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for stamp approval with the next submittal. Only 1 copy of the SWPPP report was submitted with this review. 17) Revise the SWPPP report to either reference the tab sections (1-5) where referenced as Appendices, or revise the tabs to reference the Appendices that are referenced throughout the report. One or the other must be used the report can not reference Appendices and then provide numeric tabs this makes the report confusing. 18) Part IV.C.3: Include a legible site map, complete-to-scale, of the entire site. The site map shown in the report is hard to read and verify, include a larger map (24"x36") for clarity of descriptions and locations of stormwater controls. 19) Part IV.D.1: Describe all pollution control measures (BMPs). Per page 4 this section is not complete, either provide a paragraph that describes the pollution control measures or reference an appendix or section within the report that full fills this requirement. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide an approved Development Plan, a revised grading plan, Drainage Report, geotechnical report and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the grading plan review. If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/09/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |