Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU01858
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/24/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Each lot within Wildcat Pass must submit a separate NPPO plan. 2. The NPPO shall include an inventory and analysis of all plants listed as Federal Endangered Species, all Saguaros, and all Ironwoods designated as Protected Native Plants according to Sec. 3.8.5. Preservation and mitigation requirements for these genus and species shall conform to Sec. 3.8.6. The NPPO plan prepared shall Including an aerial photograph, taken in minimum scale of 1" = 60'. Place NPP / landscape mitigation table, and aerial photograph on separate sheet measuring at least 24" x 36" indicating scale with the following information: § Limits of all areas to be graded. § Location of NUOS area § Fencing requirements as specified in Development Standard 2-06.2.2.F. Include the location, size, color, and textural treatment of all retaining walls, riprapped slopes, or other constructed means of slope stabilization must be shown on one (1) of the plans submitted. Vegetation retention and re-vegetation should be used in conjunction with riprapping. |
| 09/26/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Rubio Residence 1886 S. Twinkling Star Drive T07CM03607 & T07BU01858 Site/Grading Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 26, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Provide building setback dimensions to all property lines on the site/grading plan. 2. This grading plan cannot be approved until Engineering and Landscape sections have approved the site plan. 3. Zoning is available to provide an over the counter review once the above comments have been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 873-4956 I:\planning\site\T07BU01858.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site/grading plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/15/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 17, 2007 SUBJECT: New Single Family Residence- Engineering Review TO: Troy Williams LOCATION: 1886 S Twinkling Starr, T14S R13E Sec20 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T07CM03607 (Site Plan) and T07BU01858 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the proposed site plan and grading plan. Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted site plan and grading plan and does not recommend approval at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Provide the dimension and bearing for the front property line per the final plat, Book 59, Page 41. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Provide the width for the proposed driveway and curb cut location. The maximum driveway width allowed is 20-foot and verify that the proposed driveway is separated from adjacent driveways by a 12-foot separation. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Provide the dimensions and label the existing curb and sidewalk located along Twinkling Starr Drive. Label existing curb as either wedge or vertical. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to verify that all slopes along the driveway entrance and sidewalk transitions meet ANSI requirements. Refer to DS Sec3-01 Figure 4 for the maximum cross slope for the sidewalk and required handicap ramp. All handicap ramps must be constructed with truncated domes and must be indicted on the proposed site plan with a note or a detail. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Label on the site plan the percent slope for the proposed cut slope. Cut slope must be stabilized to be in conformance with DS Sec.9-04.3.3. Provide the percent slope on the detail and provide symbols in plan view to show the direction of the cut slope. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan so that the finished floor elevation (FFE) in plan view and detail view match. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to show filter fabric under the proposed riprap along the interceptor swale that is shown in the detail. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.18: Revise the site plan to label Twinkling Starr as a private road and Common Area "B" per the final plat, Book 59, Page 41. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the 1-foot no access easement in plan view (key note #1) along the northwest property boundary. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Revise the site plan to provide the survey information, per Book 59, Page 41, for the platted natural undisturbed open space (NUOS) that is depicted along the northeast portion of the lot. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.23: Provide on the site plan the datum reference used to establish the existing and proposed topographic contours and provide a Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and Page number. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.27: Provide on the site plan any proposed walls, fences or vegetation for screening by type, material, height, location and spacing. All requirements within DS Sec.9-04 must be satisfied. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.B: Verify that all key note in the legend are shown in plan view, if the keynote does not apply it must be removed from the legend to prevent confusion. Revise the typographical error "Ledend" with the correct Legend. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.C: Review and approval of the NPPO plan by the landscape division is required. Refer to comments posted under Landscape review. 15) DS Sec.9-04.3.1.A.1: Revise the site plan to clearly show the limits of grading. Per the site plan there are 2 limits of disturbances shown. One is referenced by keynote #6 and the other by a dashed line that is called out in plan view. Clearly show the limits of disturbance and verify that the limits will be staked and fenced as required. 16) DS Sec.9-04.3.1.A.2: Revise the site plan to include a note or verbiage in the call out that states "Temporary Fencing is required along the NUOS delineation in order to prevent encroachment into this area" 17) DS Sec.9-04.3.1.B.5: Revise the site plan to verify that all cut and fill slopes meet the HDZ and Geotechnical Report requirements and will be either revegetated or protected by constructed means such as riprapping or retaining walls. Refer to DS Sec.9-04.3.2.B and DS Sec.9-04.3.3 for methods of slope stabilization. GRADING PLAN: 18) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit has been submitted for this project due to the HDZ design review and the cut and fill quantities. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. The grading plan will be reviewed for approval once all comments associated with the site plan and HDZ design have been addressed. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the site plan. 19) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the site plan and geotechnical report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 20) Provide a general note on the site plan that references the City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: Provide a copy of the Geotechnical Report referenced in General Note #15. 21) DS Sec.10-01.3.3.5.1.3.a and 10-02.14.2.6: Verify that the following items are addressed within the report for further review. a) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. b) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, grading plan, and a geotechnical report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan, grading plan, and geotechnical report reviews. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at (520) 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2007 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/25/2007 | THAUSER1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |