Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07BU01842
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T07BU01842
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/25/2010 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 10/27/2010,

Sorrento Square Retail Center, Quick Trip Store No. 1487 revised Grading Plan, T07BU01842.

1. Are the cut and fill quantities, shown on the first sheet of the approved grading plan, still correct? It seems that the proposed grade changes for the Quick Trip site will require revising the quantities.
2. Does the legend, shown on the first sheet of the approved grading plan, need to be corrected? Check the legend and revise as required.
3. Provide all required construction details and materials to build the proposed waterharvesting basins.
4. Provide the required setback for the waterharvesting basing behind the proposed building.
5. Show all the proposed drainage structures including the canopy drainage system, the building roof drainage and the drainage inlet systems at to the basin behind the building.
6. Provide the construction details for the proposed trash enclosure or reference the enclosure standard detail.
7. Provide all required construction details and materials to build the proposed detention basins or reference the proper construction details within the Grading Plan set. Additionally, reference on sheet 9 of 9 all the required details provided within the grading plan set.
8. What is the purpose of the Houghton Road southern entrance at this phase?
9. Show the curb openings and splash pads draining into the waterharvesting basin along Houghton. Provide construction details.
10. Provide the drainage inlet systems for the waterharvesting basin behind the building. Provide details.
11. Provide the radii for all curb curves.
12. Provide the pavement material and cross sections.
13. Provide the PAAL's width and provide a detail that shows clearly that the width of the PAAL is measured at the bottom of the vertical curb(s).
14. Call out any existing or proposed slopes.
15. Replace the abbreviation (DSD) to (PDSD) in all applicable general notes.
16. The revised sheet 9 of 9 generally does not have sufficient information that is usually required on a grading plan. Ensure that the plan has all the detailed information required to construct the proposed improvements.
17. Submit a revised SWPPP that addresses the subject site.
18. Work in the public right of way requires an excavation permit and/or may require a private improvement agreement. Check with City of Tucson Department of Transportation Permits and Codes for additional information
19. Resubmit the redlined grading plan with future Grading Plan submittals for comparison.
20. Provide a detailed response letter with the next submittal that explains how the comments were addressed and references the exact locations/sheets where the revisions were made.
11/03/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied 1. Submit a copy of the approved development plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference.

2. The grading plan has been reviewed by the Landscape / NPPO Section but cannot approve the plan until all Engineering, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed.
11/04/2010 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 11/04/2010

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

3. The grading plan does not match the approved plan for phase one in regards to the parking areas along the PAAL at the north side of the property. On the approved plan this area is a 24' wide PAAL only with no parking spaces. Revise the grading plan or provide a revise development plan for phase one.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/17/2010 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/17/2010 DELMA ROBEY REJECT SHELF Completed