Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T07BU01779
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/21/2009 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Sheet C1 - Please correct the material of the proposed driveway. Note #6 on Sheet A.1 refers to an asphalt drive; Sheet C1 calls it out as a dirt drive. Please reconcile. Regardless of what's placed on private property, the portion in Camino Santiago right-of-way will need to meet public standards (probably a standard apron). A right-of-way (excavation) permit will be necessary for work performed in the right-of-way; work in the right-of-way is not covered by a grading permit. Contact Permits & Codes at 791-5100. Sheet C1 - The finished floor elevation (ffe) must be a minimum of 1' above the FEMA-determined water surface elevation at the upstream point of the structure. Please correct the ffe. Sheet C1 - It is suggested that the fill pad be elevated above the FEMA-determined water surface elevation at the upstream point of the fill pad. Doing so may facilitate removal of the structure from the FEMA floodplain and reduce the need to protect the top of the fill pad from erosion by the floodwaters. Sheet C1 - Placing of a fill pad in a FEMA floodplain requires sufficient armoring (riprap, vegetation, etc.) to resist erosion. If the fill extends less than 25' from the building edges, certification is required by a P.E. that the armoring is sufficient (this can be done on the Elevation Certificate or other format). Sheet C3 - The finished floor elevation (ffe) must be a minimum of 1' above the FEMA-determined water surface elevation at the upstream point of the structure. Please correct the ffe. Sheet C3 - It is suggested that the fill pad be elevated above the FEMA-determined water surface elevation at the upstream point of the fill pad. Doing so may facilitate removal of the structure from the FEMA floodplain and reduce the need to protect the top of the fill pad from erosion by the floodwaters. Sheet C3 - Placing of a fill pad in a FEMA floodplain requires sufficient armoring (riprap, vegetation, etc.) to resist erosion. If the fill extends less than 25' from the building edges, certification is required by a P.E. that the armoring is sufficient (this can be done on the Elevation Certificate or other format). Sheet C4 - It is suggested that the fill pad be elevated above the FEMA-determined water surface elevation at the upstream point of the fill pad. Doing so may facilitate removal of the structure from the FEMA floodplain and reduce the need to protect the top of the fill pad from erosion by the floodwaters. Sheet C4 - Placing of a fill pad in a FEMA floodplain requires sufficient armoring (riprap, vegetation, etc.) to resist erosion. If the fill extends less than 25' from the building edges, certification is required by a P.E. that the armoring is sufficient (this can be done on the Elevation Certificate or other format). General: Fill 2' (or a FFE 2' + slab thickness) or more above the existing grades brings to bear the differential grading criteria of Dev. Std. 11-01.8.0. If the lots are combined so that the area is greater than 24,000 s.f. before pulling the grading permit, differential grading is not applicable. |
| 05/21/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The Regulated Area for watercourses is defined under this Development Standard 9-06.2.2. B.2 & 3. Development shall not extend beyond the banks of a watercourse and the area within 50 feet of the top of the bank. Revise plans as necessary to comply with Development Standard. 2. Ensure that all Engineering and Zoning comments and concerns are addressed and appropriate revisions are made to site, grading and NPPO plan. |
| 06/08/2009 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | June 8, 2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T07BU01779 Grading Plans for T07CM03349 (T07OT01938 FUP) 1461 South Camino Santiago Grading for new SFR Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. We cannot verify that the grading plan is in compliance with an approved site plan for this site. Please provide one copy of the stamped approved site plan with your next submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/15/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |