Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU01681
Review Name: REVISION - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. |
| 04/10/2008 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 04/10/2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time. 2. Apparently there has been additional site inspections by Lee Ray Hanley Chief Building Inspector with regards to the disabled parking spaces. The recent inspections led to allow the existing disabled parking to be left as constructed and a as built drawing was to be provided. While it is not totally clear on the as built conditons that Lee Ray saw, I have deferred to his site inspection and his requirements. The next grading plan submittal should have all the as built conditions as Lee Ray requested. The plan will then be reviewed and presented to Lee Ray for his concurrence and eventual approval by Zoning. Any questions related to ADA should be referred to Ron Brown and Lee Ray Hanley. 3. The van accessible spaces must be clearly annotated. |
| 04/17/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 04/18/2008, Grading Plan Comments for St. Joseph's Hospital T07BU01681: 1- The revised structures are shown as built, which is not acceptable. The revisions shall be shown as proposed and called out as such. Additionally, the correct revision number shall be called out next to all proposed revisions. 2- It appears that some of the revision number call outs are shown incorrectly (e.g. Revision Number 8 is described as "grading and handicapped parking revision" yet it is shown next to the proposed retaining wall cross section Detail 5/C-4, etc.). Check all revision numbers call outs to ensure they are placed to describe the correct revision. 3- The proposed revisions shall be shown on the previously approved and stamped grading plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/21/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/21/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |