Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU01631
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/22/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Please remove all references to a private street throughout the plans. Zoning will continue the review on the resubmittal, after engineering has provided a review of the plans. Please ensure at each review, a copy of the site plan under review is included with the grading plans. |
| 08/28/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Site plan approval is required prior to grading plan approval. 2) Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the grading plan. 3) Submit a copy of the NPPO plan on which the grading limits are clearly depicted. 4) Add the following notes to the grading plan: NPPO PRE PERMIT INSPECTION MUST BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO GRUBBING OR GRADING. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE DEPRESSED A MAXIMUM OF 6' TO ACCOMODATE WATER HARVESTING. |
| 10/23/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | October 25, 2007 T07CM03201 and T07BU01631 Site and Grading Plan Review Reviewed by Loren Makus, EIT The site plan and grading plan and associated documents were review. The following comments must be addressed. Include a response letter that explains in detail how each comment has been addressed. Site and Grading comments: 1. Remove the note indicating that new streets are being created. (Notes 21 and 22 on S-1) Creation of streets requires a plat. 2. Indicate on the site plan and the grading plan the wall openings called for in the drainage report. 3. Show existing contours on adjacent properties on both the site plan and the grading plan to substantiate the offsite effects of this project. 4. Use the correct legal description for this property. Provide the correct area of the project. The area listed on the cover sheet doesn't agree with the county assessor's record. 5. Continue the curb line for Utah Street to the west so that the SVT is shown terminating at the curb line. 6. Revise the curb in front of units 9 and 10 or show curb cuts to allow access to the garages/carports for these units. 7. Where wedge curb is used the sidewalk must be separated from the curb by at least 2 feet. 8. Provide access ramps to the sidewalk where crosswalks or other pedestrian routes intersect the sidewalk. This include the curb return area at the entrance. 9. Show the basis of bearings in a graphical manner or clearly describe two found monuments to establish the bearings. Utah Street curves in front of this project so the centerline is not definitive for the basis of bearing. 10. Clarify the boundary information for the property line along Utah Street. The curve numbers are partially obliterated by other lines. Clearly indicate the endpoints of each curve. 11. Check the drawing to make sure that the curb lines are continuous along the PAAL. 12. Clearly identify the endpoints of the extruded curb. Extruded curb is not allowed in the right of way. 13. Revise the parallel parking area to provide additional space between the parking spaces and the perimeter wall. The parking space must be at least two feet from the wall and the wall must be inside the property line. Show the wall on the detail. 14. Since the inlet invert is lower than the water surface elevation in the basin, show the ponding limits within the street. Provide details for showing how the stormwater will be directed to the basin. 15. Revise the street sections to show the curb as described in the plan view. 16. Explain how solid waste will be collected from the site. Development Standard 6-01.2.2 requires all new multifamily developments to have centralized collection. Provide a solid waste container location and enclosure with access. 17. Since the drainage report is incomplete, the drainage features of this site and grading plan have not been completely reviewed. Additional comments will be forthcoming. 18. Review the City of Tucson development standards and ensure that all of the applicable requirements are met for this project. Drainage Report Comments: 19. Change the description of the openings in the wall to be "wall openings" or "drainage openings" instead of "weep holes" on page 3 of the drainage report. Indicate that drainage openings will also be used along the east boundary adjacent to the existing development. 20. The drainage report indicates that sediment in the basin when 3 inches have accumulated. Provide a means for measuring the depth of sediment in the basin. 21. Since this project is being developed as apartments, remove the note on page 5 that indicates that the basin will be maintained by the homeowners association. 22. The drainage report is not consistent. Page 3 states that only the drainage from the front yards and paved areas will be directed to the basin. Page 6 states that all for the developed conditions, all of the runoff will be captured in the basin. 23. Revise the drainage report the clearly show how off-site discharges affect the site. Provide a separate exhibit that delineates the drainage areas that impact this project site and provide hydrological calculations to establish the quantities of off-site drainage. Revise the on-site drainage to address any required changes. 24. The existing and proposed hydrologic data sheets don't account for the whole site. Provide data sheets for both existing conditions and proposed conditions that address total site and modify the proposed drainage scheme as necessary to account for the change. 25. Provide retention volume calculations and basin volume calculations in the drainage report. 26. Provide a complete drainage report as described in section 2.3 of the Drainage Manual including all of the required information from section 5 of the Retention/Detention Manual. Until a complete drainage report is approved, additonal comments may be forthcoming on the site and grading plans. SWPPP Comments: 27. Provide clear identification of the operator with operational control over plans and specifications. 28. Provide clear indentification of the operator with operational control of day-to-day operations. 29. The concrete washout must be at least 50 feet from the retention/detention basin. Include this and all additional requirements for the concrete washout area as listed in the Aquifer Protection Program general permit. (Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-B301) 30. Provide downslope sediment controls at all locations where stormwater is discharged from the site. 31. The plan must be sealed by a registered PE or Landscape Architect. This applies to the report/narrative as well as the site map. 32. Revise the SWPPP as necessary to describe this project. For example section 5.0 doen't match the proposed project. 33. Include a copy of the checklist provided by ADEQ on the internet. Fill out the checklist listing where each required element can be found in the SWPPP. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/30/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/30/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |