Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T07BU01587
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved development plan including landscape, native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved plans. |
| 11/02/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 19, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07BU01587 PROJECT NAME: SHC Warehouse PROJECT ADDRESS: 1953 West Grant Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: THREE COPIES OF THE GRADING PLAN & SWPPP, TWO COPIES OF THE DRAINAGE REPORT APPROVED: GEOTECHNICIAL REPORT, DRAINAGE REPORT 1. Two copies of the CDRC stamped approved development plan must be submitted with 3 copies of the grading plan. 2. The Development Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Development Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Development Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. Provide erosion control measures at the down stream outlet of the spillway into the basin. The above comment is from the first review and has not adequately been addressed. Detail 12 on sheet GP3 shows the basin maintenance ramp constructed with 6" D50 rock 18" thick. How will a vehicle utilize the ramp? The intent of the comment was to provide erosion protection at the base of the ramp. Provide a ramp with a surface where a maintenance vehicle can utilize it and provide either a splash pad or rock rip rap at the base of the ramp. SWPPP COMMENTS 1. Once the grading plan is close to approval submit 3 copies of the SWPPP and grading plan. 2. The Owner and Operator (1) certification statement needs to be signed prior to approval of the SWPPP. This assures the City of Tucson prior to issuance of a grading permit that there is a designated responsible party for the SWPPP. Provide signatures on all three SWPPPs from the developer. The above comment is from the first review and has not adequately been addressed. A certification statement separate from the NOI must be provided in the SWPPP booklet. Revise appropriately. |
| 11/06/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 11/06/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time. 2. While zoning acknowledges that the grading plan is in substantial zoning compliance as it relates to the Zoning review purview, with the unapproved version of the development plan, the grading plan cannot be approved at this time. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. Additional comments could be forthcoming. 4. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the CDC approved and stamped development plan. 5. The required development plan with landscape and NPPO plans that must be included with the grading plan package and must be the CDRC approved and stamped set, two copies of each are required. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/26/2007 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/26/2007 | THAUSER1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |