Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU01542
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/22/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 02/22/08 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 02/27/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved site plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved site plan. |
| 04/01/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | April 2, 2008 T07CM03057 and T07BU01542 Site and Grading Plan Review The Site and Grading Plans cannot be approved at this time. Address the following comments and submit a revised site plan for review. Include a letter that details how each comment has been addressed. Drainage Report Comments: 1. The drainage report is accepted. Site Plan/Grading Plan Comments: 2. The SWPPP will be approved when the grading plan is approved. Revise the SWPPP as necessary if the site and grading plans are revised. Include the SWPPPs with the next submittal. Note that the Construction General Permit has been superseded by a permit issued on February 29, 2008. Revise the SWPPP to be consistent with the new permit. 3. Revise site plan keynote 7 or detail C/4 to provide a consistent sidewalk width. The note indicates a 4-foot sidewalk width, which is the minimum required, while the detail indicates a 6-foot sidewalk width. 4. Revise detail B/5 to be consistent with the plan view. The plan view indicates a 16-foot pavement width and a barricade railing. The plan view and detail must agree. Check all details for consistency with the main plan view. 5. Revise the location of truncated domes on detail E/4 so that they only appear at the interface between vehicle use areas and pedestrian areas where there is no vertical separation. Add truncated domes along the sides of the drop-off drive as well. Add truncated domes where the sidewalk crosses the driveway. 6. Provide spot grades in the Detention Basin Section (B/5) that is consistent with the site and grading plans. If you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting, I can be reached at 520.837.4927 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/08/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |