Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU01542
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/30/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 08/14/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | August 22, 2007 T07CM03057 and T07BU01542 Site and Grading Plan Review The Site and Grading Plans cannot be approved at this time. Address the following comments and submit a revised site plan for review. Include a letter that details how each comment has been addressed. Drainage Report Comments: 1. The drainage report is accepted. Site Plan/Grading Plan Comments: 2. Provide the recordation information for the easement that is to be abandoned. 3. Key note 14 is used on the site plan. Provide a description in the list. 4. Provide additional proposed spot elevations for the site/grading plans. Indicate by note or by proposed grades that the basin will be designed to drain toward the outlet structure. 5. The proposed and existing sewer lines appear to be very close to the bottom of the retention basin. Consider changing the basin or the sewer lines to remove the potential conflict. If the site is not reconfigured, show how the sewer lines will be protected from tunneling from the water stored in the basin. 6. Provide truncated domes at all locations where pedestrian use areas abut vehicular use areas without a vertical separation. All curb ramps require truncated domes. 7. Show the location of the solid waste container and the proposed pick-up location. If a rolling container is to be used, indicate the storage location. Make a note that if more than 3 cans are required by the facility, a revised site plan providing for a dumster will be required. 8. The SWPPP will be approved when the grading plan is approved. revise the SWPPP as necessary if the site and grading plans are revised. Include the SWPPPs with the next submittal. If you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting, I can be reached at 520.837.4927 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 08/15/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved site plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved site plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/28/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/28/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |