Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T07BU01363
Parcel: 13709002B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T07BU01363
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/19/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit a copy of the Linear Park Landscape plan for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the landscape plan. Additional comments may apply upon subsequent reviews.
07/19/2007 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied July 19, 2007

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Michael St.Paul
Planning Technician

T07BU001363 Grading Plans for D06-0009
1301 West Irvington Road

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. In addition, we could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan for Zoning Review. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped Development Plan/Site Plan, Landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. Please be aware that the Development Plan must also go through the Site Plan process. This is a walk through process in which the stamped approved Development Plan is also approved as a Site Plan.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
08/02/2007 MATT FLICK ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Parque De Santa Cruz River Restoration - 90% Submittal Comments

GENERAL: The Administrative Address for this project is 1301 W Irvington Rd.

The DRAINAGE REPORT is not approved for Grading Plan or PIA Plan purposes. The following comments are offered:

VOLUME I:

Section 3.0 - FEMA Flood Hazard Data

Significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A LOMR is required for this project. Failure to obtain a CLOMR may put occupancy and acceptance of planned improvements at risk.

Section 6.0 - Hydrologic Data

Use of a different flow value (55,000 cfs) than the FEMA data (60,000) may make matching the FEMA water surface elevations and floodway more difficult when the LOMR is prepared.

Appendices:

Please provide a watershed map showing the tributary watersheds. It should be to scale and use topography as a base.

VOLUME II:

Section 3.0 - FEMA Flood Hazard Data

Significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A LOMR is required for this project. Failure to obtain a CLOMR may put occupancy and acceptance of planned improvements at risk.

Appendix C - Existing One-Dimensional Hydraulic Data

The approach states that a floodway analysis isn't being prepared because there's no significant encroachment into wash floodplains. This entire project is a significant encroachment and significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A floodway analysis is necessary to comply with the City of Tucson floodplain regulations.

Appendix E -Proposed One-Dimensional Hydraulic Data

The approach states that a floodway analysis isn't being prepared because there's no significant encroachment into wash floodplains. This entire project is a significant encroachment and significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A floodway analysis is necessary to comply with the City of Tucson floodplain regulations.

Appendix J - Tributary Hydrology and Hydraulics

The hydrology for the tributary channels could not be reviewed as there was no watershed map. Please provide a watershed map showing the tributary watersheds. It should be to scale and use topography as a base. Tributary hydraulics were reviewed for approach but, since the hydrology is still not approved, channel hydraulics and the designs based upon the hydraulics are not accepted at this time.

GRADING PLAN:

Sheet C-1:

Please include "Development Standards" in CMX Standard Engineering Note #3 or add a note similar to "All Grading Shall Conform to City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01 Unless Noted Otherwise".

I recommend correcting the spelling of Tucson in the title header at the top of the sheet.

The correct designation for the Benchmark is "BM 581" and it is located at the northeast corner.

Please replace the Blue Stake figure with one having the correct phone number (1-800-STAKE-IT or 1-800-782-5348) for Pima County.

Sheet S-1:

Please note that these are the 90% plans.

Please correct the street name to "Drexel Road".

I recommend correcting the spelling of Santa Cruz River next to the Drexel Road crossing.

Sheets P-4 through P-8:

I recommend dropping "and Profile" from the title blocks since there is only a plan view and no profile.

Sheet P-11 - Tributary 1 Plan and Profile:

Please note that only a preliminary review was performed since the hydrology is still not approved.

Sheet P-12 - Tributary 2 Plan and Profile:

Please note that only a preliminary review was performed since the hydrology is still not approved.

Sheet P-13 - Tributary 3 Plan and Profile:

Please note that only a preliminary review was performed since the hydrology is still not approved.

Please correct the overwrite in Section E.

Sheets P-14 & P-15 - Tributary 4 Plan and Profile:

Please note that only a preliminary review was performed since the hydrology is still not approved.

Sheet P-16 - Tributary 5 Plan and Profile:

Please note that only a preliminary review was performed since the hydrology is still not approved.

Sheet S-3 - Approximate Utility Locations:

Please note that these are the 90% plans.

I recommend placing the Blue Stake figure on this sheet. Please ensure that it is the one having the correct phone number (1-800-STAKE-IT or 1-800-782-5348) for Pima County.

Sheet D-1 - Detail Sheet:

Please note that these are the 90% plans.

I recommend correcting the spelling of Tucson in the title block.

Please show the handrail on the applicable cross-sections. Although shown on the plan sheets, adding the handrail on the sections aids in clarity for the contractors and inspectors.

Lettering appears to be cropped on left side of Detail B.

SWPPP:

Signatures are needed on Page ii (Operators).

A signature is needed on Page iii (SWPPP Certification).

Names and phone numbers are needed on Page iv (Contact List).

There are no contents in Appendix A (NOI, Authorization Certificate, NOT).

There are no contents in Appendix C (AZPDES General Permit).

Appendix D contains a sheet showing major watershed boundaries and receiving waters for Maricopa County. This sheet can be omitted.

Please revise Sheet BMP-108 to reflect the work is being done in the City of Tucson and list local (or 800 #s) for ADEQ.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/14/2007 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/14/2007 CINDY AGUILAR REJECT SHELF Completed