Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU01190
Review Name: REVISION - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/03/2011 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 05/03/2011 1. Provide a cover letter that includes a detailed description of the proposed changes. 2. Cross Section Detail Z, on Sheet 2 of 5, does not appear to represent Cross Section Z. The slope symbol, near Cross Section Z-Z, appears to be indicating the wrong direction. Revise as necessary. 3. It is not clear if Cross Section Detail 3/5 needs to be revised. Address this issue and revise as needed. 4. Provide elevations, dimensions and structural details for all proposed retaining walls, between Lots 72-78, 79-82, and 83 & 84, shown on Sheet 2 of 5. Will the walls be waterproofed? Please be advised that structural review might be required. 5. Will the walls, shown in Details E/5, F/5, G/5 and H/5, be waterproofed? 6. Provide the thickness, dimensions and structural details of the proposed gunite bank protection shown in Details 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, on Sheet 3 of 5. Provide the depths of the proposed toe downs. 7. Provide the dimensions and structural details of the proposed wall between Lots 84-89, shown on Sheet 3 of 5. Will the wall be waterproofed? 8. Provide elevations, dimensions and structural details for all proposed retaining walls, between Lots 90-94, 95-99, and 100 & 101, shown on Sheet 4 of 5. Will the walls be floodproofed? Please be advised that structural review might be required. 9. Cross out any old detail that will not be used with the proposed revisions. |
05/10/2011 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | May 10, 2011 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T07BU01190 Grading Plans for S06-186 Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections. 2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
05/13/2011 | DROBEY1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Needs Review |