Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU01102
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 08/08/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 08/22/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 27, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07BU01102 PROJECT NAME: Knittel Commercial Warehouse PROJECT ADDRESS: 3178 North Freeway Industrial Loop PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. The grading plan now shows off site work on the southeast side of the property. Be advised written permission form the owner and a temporary construction easement will be required for the off site work. Provide appropriate documentation with the next submittal and include the recordation data on the grading plan. This comment will continue to be made until resolved; see site plan comment dated 8.27.07. 4. Show on the grading plan the existing and proposed 100 year discharge concentration point locations include the quantities. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A. This comment is from the previous review and has not been addressed. 2nd request. 5. Provide in a general note the area of disturbance. This comment is from the previous review and depending on the result of the site plan comment and the above comment # 3 the area of disturbance may increase. If the temporary construction easement has work related to this project the area must be included in the area of disturbance. Revise appropriately. Be advised over an acre of disturbance a SWPPP is required. 6. Indicate on the appropriate details the retaining wall is to be obtained by separate permit. 7. Indicate if the northern 5' CMU wall is proposed or existing. 8. Provide erosion control and scour prevention at the outlet of both channels. Retention/detention Manual 3.3.3. 9. Clearly indicate what is being proposed at the far northwest and northeast corners of the property where the 19' drainage easement enters the site and exits the site. Where does the proposed retaining wall (detail P and Q) end? Does it extend to the back property line? Clearly show the transition between the retaining wall and the 19' easement. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/31/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |