Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T07BU01102
Parcel: 107020120

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T07BU01102
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/24/2007 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 05/24/07

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
06/05/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: June 5, 2007
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07BU01102
PROJECT NAME: Knittel Commercial Warehouse
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3178 North Freeway Industrial Loop
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert

The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN

1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal.

2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match.

3. The grading plan now shows off site work on the southeast side of the property. Be advised written permission form the owner and a temporary construction easement will be required for the off site work. Provide appropriate documentation with the next submittal and include the recordation data on the grading plan.

4. Show on the grading plan the existing and proposed 100 year discharge concentration point locations include the quantities. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A.

5. Show the direction of roof drainage (flow arrows). DS 2-02.2.1.A.16.

6. Provide in a general note the area of disturbance.

7. Add a general note; Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html

8. The detail number for the earthen channel (keynote 22) is not correct. Revise.

9. Slopes 1:1(H:V) require grouted rip rap. Provide the required slope treatment for the channel slopes (keynote 22).

10. Be advised this industrial subdivision failed an Engineering basin inspection in 2005. An Inspection Result letter was sent to "Garold C Brown Ltd Partnership attention to Mr. Russel Shaw on June 9, 2005. The owner/developer of the basin has not complied with all outstanding issues from the inspection results. A hold on the Certificate of Occupancy under the Final Engineering Inspection will be placed on this activity until the basin is maintained and brought up to design standards. All issues associated with the Inspection Result letter sent June 9, 2005 needs to be resolved prior to release of the final engineering inspection hold.

11. In addition to the above comment a Certification letter from an Arizona Registered Civil Engineer, to verify that the basin has been brought up to the design standards and has been properly maintained is required prior to the release of the Final Inspection hold.

12. Please be advised this outstanding issue with the basin maintenance will not hold up approval of the site or grading plan.

13. Please note that subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans.
06/05/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/08/2007 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/08/2007 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed