Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU01023
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The development plan must have a site card with DSD stamps and approvals before the grading plan can be reviewed. 2. Submit a copy of the approved development plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved development plan. |
| 08/06/2007 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | August 6, 2007 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T07BU01023 Grading Plans for D07-0003 9337 East Old Vail Road Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. In addition, we could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan for Zoning Review. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped Development Plan/Site Plan, Landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. Please be aware that the Development Plan must also go through the Site Plan process. This is a walk through process in which the stamped approved Development Plan is also approved as a Site Plan. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 08/13/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Knudsen-Smith Engineering DATE: August 20, 2007 2525 W. Greemway Rd., Ste. 302 Phoenix, Arizona 85023 SUBJECT: Irrigation & Turf Supply, 9337 E. Old Vail Rd. CDRC Grading Plan T07BU01023 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 27 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, Drainage Report and SWPPP The Grading Plan (GP), Drainage Report (DR) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Grading plan clearly marked "GRADING PLAN". 2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 4. Add the following notes to the grading plan notes: · "The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work." · "The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of the detention/retention basin and scarify the basin bottom once the construction activities are completed in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation." · "Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it." 5. Call out surface paving material. A min. of double shot chip seal for vehicular use areas is required. 6. Show details of all surface materials. 7. Provide a Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 8. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 9. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The inside dimensions of the refuse enclosure shall be a clear 10'x10', front to rear, side to side and from bollard to bollard. 10. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line. It appears that some grading is being done off the property. Please address as required. 11. Re-submit the DR and SWPPP along with the corrected copies of the Grading Plan. Drainage Report: 1. The DR has been accepted by Engineering with the following minor comments: 2. Show the project address on the cover of the Drainage Report. 3. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/9337 E. Old Vail Rd. Grad |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/11/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |