Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T07BU00756
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/15/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/17/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 17, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07BU00756 PROJECT NAME: A-Atlas Discount Storage PROJECT ADDRESS: 9615 East Broadway Blvd PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. Show the grading limits on the plan. See the Development Standard 11-01.9. for the required setbacks. The above comment is from the previous review. Clearly indicate on the plan the minimum 2' setback for grading limits will be met. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENTS 1. Grading in excess of 5000 cubic yards is designated as "engineered grading," which requires the soil's report to comply with DS 11-01.4.D. Ensure the site plan provides the soil's report recommendations for engineered grading. SWPPP COMMENTS Be advised a SWPPP was not submitted with the review package so the SWPPP comments still apply. Be sure to submit 3 copies of the SWPPP with the next submittal. 1. It has been brought to the attention of this office that the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) 24 hour reporting number has been changed to 602.771.2209. Please revise all applicable areas in the SWPPP. 2. Please refer to the enclosed green document "AZPDES - Posting Requirements". This must be placed at the construction entrance of the site at beginning of construction activities and maintain this posted document throughout project construction. Be advised this document must be completely filled out upon the time of the pre-construction meeting. 3. Submit 3 copies of the revised SWPPP once the grading plan is closer to approval. 4. The certification statement must to be signed prior to approval of the SWPPP. This assures the City of Tucson prior to issuance of a grading permit that there is a designated responsible party for the SWPPP. Revise appropriately. 5. On the plan add the following verbiage in a general note; Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 6. The operator responsible for day to day activities (the contractor) and the operator with control over plans and specifications (owner/engineer) is required to submit an NOI to the state and a copy to the City of Tucson. Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and a copy to the City of Tucson. The NOI provided in the submitted SWPPP has not been filled out and signed by the appropriate party. Revise to provide a complete NOI application. (Part IV.F) 7. Stormwater controls must be placed on the project site, otherwise if placed off site the property owner's permission is required with a temporary construction easement. Revise the SWPPP site map to show the straw bales located in the northwest corner to be onsite. 8. Callout the stabilized construction entrance for the site; the line weight is not visible. 9. Provide a sediment basin in an appropriate location. (Part IV.D.5.a.) |
| 10/17/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Include with re-submittal the approved landscape, and NPP Plans. The grading plans will be reviewed for conformance with the approved document. |