Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T07BU00680
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL

Permit Number - T07BU00680
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/31/2007 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: November 5, 2007
SUBJECT: Desert View Plaza Lot 1-7 Grading Plan- 3rd Engineering Review
TO: Baker and Associates Engineering, Inc.
LOCATION: 6307 S Alvernon, T15S R14E Sec10, Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T07BU00680


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised grading plan, Drainage Report (Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc., 22MAR07, revised 28JUN07, revised 17OCT07), Geotechnical Evaluation (Western Technologies, 2920JX177, with addendum 25JUN07), Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc., MAR07, revised JUN07, revised17OCT07) and last approved Tentative Plat sheets for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


GRADING PLAN COMMENTS:

1) It is acknowledge that TDOT Permits and Codes has agreed to let the completion of the sidewalk along the frontage of Antrim Road east of the entrance road to be completed at Phase II construction, however provide an email correspondence from Permits and Codes stating their approval of the Phased sidewalk construction. Provide a note on the grading plan that states this requirement.

2) Revise the grading plan to provide one of the following options for the required sidewalk along Valencia Road:

a) Per the Pima County Major Streets and Scenic Routes Plan the required future right-of-way width for Valencia Road is 200-feet. This revision will be required for the Tentative Plat and a redesign may be required if the required parking spaces are influenced by the redesign. Refer to CDRC for the requirements for revising an approved Tentative Plat.
b) This area of Valencia Road is currently under review with the City of Tucson to be annexed into the City limits. If the revision for the Pima County right-of-way width of 200-feet is not desired then provided the required 6-foot sidewalk along the entire street frontage of Valencia Road to be in compliance with the City of Tucson MS&R requirements.

3) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: A post-percolation test from a registered geotechnical engineer will be required prior to the final grading inspection approval. Add a general note to Sheet 1 of 7 that states a "Post percolation test is required for this project prior to the Final Grading Inspection." Note: vegetation can not be placed within the basin until the post-percolation test confirms that the channels and basin meet the required drain down time. A larger note must be added to the general note section for clarity at the time of final grading inspection.

4) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications:

a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html /

b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php

c) Or contact Thad Harveston at 741-3115 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w.

5) Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the grading plan.


STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The last submitted SWPPP reports meet the requirements of the AZDES. Provide the 3 copies of the SWPPP Report and exhibits with the resubmittal for stamped approval.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised grading plan at resubmittal. Please include 'Redlines' with the resubmittal package.

The revised grading plan must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
10/31/2007 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied 10/31/07

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Principal Planner

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time.

2. Draw and label class one and class two bicycle parking faciltities.

3. Add to the title that this grading plan is for Phase one only.

4. Zoning is willing to review and approve the grading plan over the counter once the changes are made to the plan. If you wish for Zoning to do a review and approval over the counter please call in advance for an appointment.
11/02/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are reflected on the grading plan.

The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the appropriate changes are included in the submittal.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/07/2007 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/07/2007 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed