Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T07BU00447
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Each lot within Wildcat Pass must submit a separate NPPO plan. 2. The NPPO shall include an inventory and analysis of all plants listed as Federal Endangered Species, all Saguaros, and all Ironwoods designated as Protected Native Plants according to Sec. 3.8.5. Preservation and mitigation requirements for these genus and species shall conform to Sec. 3.8.6.2. 3. To protect the natural areas, a covenant must be provided with record interest in the natural area in favor of the City of Tucson per LUC 2.8.1.7.D. Submit the required covenant or conservation easement and legal description for review. |
| 06/15/2007 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Plan Technician Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan (if available), landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. a. Label and dimension the 50-foot WASH study limits. b. The site plan can be reviewed and approved once the grading plan is approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 06/25/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | June 28, 2007 T07BU00447/T07CM00774 Grading and Building review The grading permit cannont be approved at this time. Address the following comments and resubmit the grading plan. Include a response letter that provides details for how each comment has been addressed. Since there are significant inconsistencies in the current plan there may be comments on new issues when the plan is submitted again. Grading Plan Comments: 1. Provide cut and fill quantities on the grading plan. Ensure that the quantities are consistent with the proposed work as demonstrated by existing and proposed grades. 2. Provide a north arrow and scale near the site plan. 3. Provide a note indicating the area of proposed grading in square feet or acres. 4. Provide representative proposed spot elevations or proposed contours throughout the plan to establish the future grades. The provide spot elevations near the wall indicate that significant grading will occur below the grade of the house. Clearly identify the edges of the graded area and provide representative elevations. 5. Label all of the contours in or near the graded area with elevation data. 6. Provide cross sections at representative locations at the edge of the disturbance area to show how the finish grades will be achieved in relation to the undisturbed areas. 7. Revise the grading limits and the proposed grades to be consistent. The current plan shows revised contours extending beyond the grading limits. 8. Extend the grading limits to encompass the work to be performed within the right-of-way. Add a note indicating that all work in the right-of way requires a separate right-of-way permit. 9. Revise the slopes in the driveway area to limit the longitudinal slopes to 15 per cent or less at all location. 10. Show sufficient grade and slope information to demonstrate that ponding will not occur along the uphill side of the house and garage. 11. Provide a detail of the intersceptor swale. Provide sizing information for the rip rap and embedment depth information for the swale. 12. Clearly identify the 14 locations for the erosion control aprons as listed in the legend. 13. Clearly identify the areas specified in engineering notes 8 and 9. 14. Section A is called out in the plan view but doesn't appear in a detail. Detail B is shown but not called out on the plan. Revise the plan as necessary. Building Comments: 15. The building plans cannot be approved until the grading plans have been approved. Please ensure that the building plans are consistent with the grading plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at520.837.4927 or at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2007 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/29/2007 | THAUSER1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |