Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU00398
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 16, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07BU00398 PROJECT NAME: Hegel Court PROJECT ADDRESS: 1545 W. Hegel Lane PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan/plat must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan/plat is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan/plat must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. Provide the water surface elevations for each basin (east and west). 4. Provide the 100 year peak discharge chart that is provided on the plat, sheet 1. 5. Show roof drainage (flow arrows). DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 6. Provide a detail for the earthen spillway identified in the northwest corner of the property. Indicate and show on the plan view the peak discharge at the outlet. 7. Provide the docket and page for the private ingress/egress, private utility, public utility, private sewer and drainage easement(s) that is indicated in keynote 18. 8. Provide more finish grades between the proposed structures and the basins. Positive drainage must be clearly indicated. 9. If applicable, indicate on the plan if there are existing or proposed walls located on the south and west boundary of the site. Revise detail5/1 appropriately. 10. Stormwater must be accepted and released from developments essentially at the same locations, and with the same magnitudes, as encountered under natural or existing conditions. Because a CMU wall is proposed for the east boundary of the development, address how the development will not block the existing direction of flow. Whenever walls are constructed, they must have adequate flow-through openings for accepting and releasing drainage without elevating or ponding water on the upstream side. What is the sizing of the wall openings? Provide a detail on the plan of the wall openings. Revise the plan as necessary. SMDDFM 12.5 11. A soils report is required in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility that utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. Percolation test must show a maximum disposal time of 12 hours. Provide the report with the next submittal. SDRM 3.5.1.5. and SMDDFM 14.2.6. |
| 03/16/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/11/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. Per the preliminary site plan submittedas reference with the grading plan, a shed structure is indicated in front of the exisitng workshop on lot four. The shed has not been drawn or labeled on the grading plan. Please clarify if the shed is to be removed otherwise drawn and label the shed. 5. A concrete sidewalk must be added along the east side of the vehicular use area next to the exisitng workshop. 6. The final plat expired on March 2nd. Please ensure that an extension of the approval date is requested in writing to the CDRC manager Patricia Gehlen. 7. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the approved and stamped site plan. 8. Please ensure that the location of the dumpster meets development standards. Refer to Environmental services comments for more information on this issue. |
| 03/19/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved tentative plat (Minor Subdivision) Case # S06-053 including landscape plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved tentative plat. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/23/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/23/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |