Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T07BU00258
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clearly delineate on the grading, landscape, and NPPO plans to show the limits of grading for natural area to remain. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5. 2. Identify on grading plan the natural area to remain LUC 3.8.6.4.D. 3. Submit the COT stamped and approved final plat. |
| 05/10/2007 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | May 10, 2007 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T07BU00258 Grading Plans for S05-246 Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved final plat for a minor subdivision. Please submit one copy of the CDRC approved and stamped final plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 05/20/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 21, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07BU00258 PROJECT NAME: Barrio Ochoa PROJECT ADDRESS: 1510 South 9th Ave PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: THREE COPIES OF THE GRADING PLAN & SWPPP Be advised the next review can be conducted over the counter. 1. Provide details showing the outlet structure for the basin. Indicate construction material and describe the erosion protection that will be used. (2nd Request) SWWPP COMMENTS 1. The first review it was requested to change verbiage "structural control" to "sediment control" on the site map. This comment has not been fully addressed. On the site map where the silt fencing is called out the verbiage "structural control," is still there. Revise appropriately. 2. Clearly indicate on the SWPPP site map that the concrete wash out will be 50' from any watercourse or drainage structure. |